reThousands Turn Out For Wal-Mart Jobs

Status
Not open for further replies.
I don't even look at FICA as a retirement deal, it's just another tax.

Anyone who wants gainful employment in 20 years or so should get a Certified Nurse Assistant, Home health aide, etc certification. There will be incredible demand. One can name their price. Naturally if a SS or Medicare benefit is increased, that price will follow, and people will still not be able to hire qualified help if they don't have additional savings.
 
Exactly. It's all indexed for the available revenue at the time of use. If everyone had done the max contribution to their IRA from the mid-70's ..you would have a generation+ of retiring millionaires that would be paying millions for everything. More than likely, as occurred with all forms of investment at one time or another, there would be a "harvest or venting" within the market to form the needed technical corrections.

Since we're in a loser/losing disposition anyway, what does one expect
21.gif
You can't bolster profits via expanding foreign markets at the loss to your citizens ..then wonder why the revenue needed to support them just isn't there any more. Ask China and a number of other nations for it back. Meanwhile, you play "redistribute the costs" shell game.
 
Last edited:
"So whether it is a direct tax on income or an indirect tax on goods and services, all taxes are paid for by earners and none by business"
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ok, and people who are employed are earners? That's a good thing, right?

When people apply for a job they are potential earners, but not yet earners so they are not paying taxes? Where is their money coming from? If they can't afford healthcare, can they afford to eat? How do they afford to eat if they are not earners?

Why do they apply for jobs that would lower their standard of living? Is this some conspiracy of a public education system? Children are told to take employment which will make their lives worse.

What a good case for private education.
 
Originally Posted By: Chris B.
Wal-Mart is really a good company to work for reguardless what the media says. I work for them and I'm a regular hourly associate(non-management)and make $37,000 a year working 40 hour weeks. Roughly $19.00 per hour but I started at $9.00 per hour 10 years ago. It took me a while to get up that high. They do not have a "top out" pay and if you put in your time and pay your dues you will get paied pretty good if you stick with it.


You did VERY WELL for yourself at walmart. I started working in the photolab at walmart supercenter 9/07 making $6 an hour part time! I only stayed 10 months though. I ended up going to college and finished my nursing degree. I got hired two days after I graduated nursing school.
 
Originally Posted By: GROUCHO MARX

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The price of Wally's stock hasn't gone up in at least 5 years.


Back in 1997, I did the employee stock purchase plan, $5 every two weeks. back then, walmart expanded into the grocery, photo lab, tire and lube business. When I started walmart was $30 a share, I left ten months later it was $90 a share. I was mad that I didn't put more than $5 a paycheck!
 
Want to build a new auto dealership?

GM, Nissan, and Chrysler say it must be within a certain distance of a shopping mall or....

A Wal Mart.
 
Quote:
Where is their money coming from?


Some earner is providing it for them. If I don't work, I'll pay some taxes. My wife will be bearing this burden for me (gosh, why didn't I think of this much sooner
54.gif
grin2.gif
)


Quote:
Why do they apply for jobs that would lower their standard of living?


Since jobs that maintained their standard of living are now in countries with much lower standards of living. We export jobs ..we import poverty.

"THAT'L TEACH 'EM!!"
grin2.gif
 
Gary, all products will be made by the lowest cost producer. If jobs left the country for a lower cost producer that's economics, globalization. whatever you want to call it.

If one would prefer to artificially raise the cost of goods and services through tarrifs (which are some of the most regressive taxes known), who am I to argue? The underclass will suffer much more under this arrangement, but again, who am I to argue?
 
The cost of goods (produced in this country) and services are artificially raised through environmental regulations, workplace regulations, you name it. Let's get rid of all of those so we can REALLY compete with the third world.
 
Last edited:
Quote:
Gary, all products will be made by the lowest cost producer. If jobs left the country for a lower cost producer that's economics, globalization. whatever you want to call it.


Sure ..and if done in a HONEST and ABOVE BOARD manner ..everything is self correcting. Usually it works this way. "If I'm too broke to buy your widgets, you can go stifle yourself." Hence, foreign producers are usually forced to assure that there are viable customers. This realigns our labor pool to assure a favorable differential for continued trade. We employ them. They employ us. This had one complication that Wall St. & Co. had to overcome. The "realignment" was after a recession ..and the reconfiguring/retraining of our labor pool was cumbersome and cause delays. So, they basically conspired to assure that there was an extended watershed economy held up by vapor money in the form of new housing starts. This provided enough false downstream supporting economy to shovel money off shore while letting millions lose their jobs at gainful employment. Add to this the loans on goods we couldn't pay for ...credit we didn't warrant ...blablabla ..and all flagshippped by our own Fed Reserve.

Quote:
If one would prefer to artificially raise the cost of goods and services through tarrifs (which are some of the most regressive taxes known), who am I to argue? The underclass will suffer much more under this arrangement, but again, who am I to argue?


If one would prefer to artificially lower the cost of goods and services through phony money (which are some of the most criminally insidious and disingenuous convoluted techniques of THIEVES AND LIARS)and send your fellow American to the poor house (just don't tell him until it's too late), who are you to argue if it benefits you? You'll take the gain, no?? I'll suppoort your right to do this in self interest. I'll support your right to take pride in helping it happen. THAT'LL TEACH 'EM!!
21.gif


Quote:
The cost of goods (produced in this country) and services are artificially raised through environmental regulations, workplace regulations, you name it. Let's get rid of all of those so we can REALLY compete with the third world.


True, but more insidiously, goods from other nations are artificially low do to loans by the producing nations. I don't give a rat's behind about some horse hoocky "balance of payments" non-sense that the financiers point to in some rationalization of keeping the bathtub drain open.

We have "legal corruption". We don't outright bribe anyone. We have the Dept of Agriculture, the EPA, the DOT, the insurance cartel, the medical cartel, the pharmaceutical cartel, and the legal cartel. We, for a while anyway, could afford to support these bureaucracies/sectors because we had the wealth. Now they're the albatross around our necks. It's their "self service" that makes us non-competitive ..yet they are most instrumental in assuring their own niche access to our revenues. They're actually socialized enterprises. Those who earn support the entire system in one manner or another.
 
There used to be good plenty of good paying jobs, but the constanty reelected politicians that are campain promising to help the people, allowed the jobs to go off shore . To China for example .
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom