Renewable energy isn't that expensive

Status
Not open for further replies.
Originally Posted By: PandaBear
Originally Posted By: Jarlaxle
Originally Posted By: oilpsi2high
Have fun with the lien on your home!


Are you intoxicated?


No he is not, if you got into a solar lease or purchase agreement at a bad price, you cannot get out of it until you buy out your panel. If the new buyer are not willing to resume your agreement, you have to buy it out with your own money before you can remove the lien to sell the house.


This. Along with things like roof leaks and other failures that are inevitable down the road. Have fun removing those panels to reshingle your roof!
 
Originally Posted By: CT8
Ask Spain.


What a coincidence - I just got off the phone with them.

They said "When you have our great sunny climate, our terrible economy, and our crippling dependency on imported oil and natural gas because of a basic lack of those resources, Solar is the Way to Go !"
 
Originally Posted By: milkboy
Originally Posted By: CT8
Ask Spain.


What a coincidence - I just got off the phone with them.

They said "When you have our great sunny climate, our terrible economy, and our crippling dependency on imported oil and natural gas because of a basic lack of those resources, Solar is the Way to Go !"



Denmark went "all the way" with wind power, yet it actually only supplies ~36% of their power due to its intermittence and unpredictability. The rest of it; the vast majority, is imported from its "dirty" neighbours. And for that privilege they pay the highest rates in Europe. France, who runs a fleet of nukes, pays some of the lowest.
 
Originally Posted By: oilpsi2high
Originally Posted By: PandaBear
Originally Posted By: Jarlaxle
Originally Posted By: oilpsi2high
Have fun with the lien on your home!


Are you intoxicated?


No he is not, if you got into a solar lease or purchase agreement at a bad price, you cannot get out of it until you buy out your panel. If the new buyer are not willing to resume your agreement, you have to buy it out with your own money before you can remove the lien to sell the house.


This. Along with things like roof leaks and other failures that are inevitable down the road. Have fun removing those panels to reshingle your roof!


Oh, the horror, you need to do that every 25 years or so!
smirk.gif
 
Originally Posted By: Jarlaxle
Or someone not able to write a $50,000 check to buy a system!


At fair market rate, how long do you think it would take those solar panels to recoup your $50K?

Our local utility installed a FIELD of them (200 acres), and at a HEAVILY subsidized rate of $42c/KWh, are looking at roughly 10 years to pay them off. At normal market rates it would take half a century to pay them off, in which case they'd already have died at least once, probably twice and needed to be replaced, incurring even greater expense.

Heavily subsidized wind, and in particular solar, were/are a wet dream for these "green energy" companies that popped up seemingly overnight and wanted to sell you panels or rent your roof so that they would put their own panels on there and reap the benefits. When that carpet gets pulled, like in Australia, all of a sudden the income to debt ratio drops off the map and the panels they mortgaged based on a fairytale ROI bankrupts them.

Eventually solar WILL become cheap enough to pay for itself IMHO, at fair market rates. But the instability and grid manipulations required to make it work will drive up electricity prices as well and probably drive down rates paid for solar. Somebody has to pay for the infrastructure and technology to make this work and it won't be the utility, they will always ensure that this cost gets passed on to the end user.
 
Originally Posted By: Jarlaxle
In my mother's case, not quite ten years.


At what rate was she payed for her energy? You'll notice I said "at fair market rate" which, in the case of Australia, is now ~7c/KWh. Historically it has been grossly subsidized.
 
For example, I found this:

Originally Posted By: Wikipedia
Solar power in Massachusetts has been increasing rapidly, due to a 30% tax grant for installations begun before December 31, 2011,[2] and the sale of SRECs for $0.30/kWh,[3] which allow payback for the system within 5 or 6 years, and generating an income for the rest of the life of the system. For systems installed after December 31, 2011, and before December 31, 2016, the 30% tax grant becomes a 30% tax credit. There has been an appeal to the Congress to extend the 1603 program, the grant program, for an additional year.


30 cents per KWh on top of a 30% tax grant is not fair market rate, it is grossly subsidized.
 
Originally Posted By: OVERKILL
For example, I found this:

Originally Posted By: Wikipedia
Solar power in Massachusetts has been increasing rapidly, due to a 30% tax grant for installations begun before December 31, 2011,[2] and the sale of SRECs for $0.30/kWh,[3] which allow payback for the system within 5 or 6 years, and generating an income for the rest of the life of the system. For systems installed after December 31, 2011, and before December 31, 2016, the 30% tax grant becomes a 30% tax credit. There has been an appeal to the Congress to extend the 1603 program, the grant program, for an additional year.


30 cents per KWh on top of a 30% tax grant is not fair market rate, it is grossly subsidized.

The cost of electricity fluctuates by the minute though, especially during the day. Solar isn't base load production, its to fill in the afternoon peaks in electricity demand where the wholesale prices are $.20-.80/kwh. No one with solar panels is producing electricity when its cheap to buy already from under utilized base load production plants...
In a few years when panels cost half as much and energy storage is half as much, then it might be considered for base load production.
 
Originally Posted By: Shannow
Originally Posted By: IndyIan

In a few years when panels cost half as much and energy storage is half as much, then it might be considered for base load production.


So what technologies are going to halve eitehr of those costs...and provide the raw materials and distribution...and recycling ?

http://reneweconomy.com.au/2014/solar-industry-provides-far-more-jobs-in-australia-than-coal-69251

In a modern economy, surely that's clearly more expensive.

I don't know. I'm not in solar R&D... How are the next computers going to be twice as fast? Or RAM cost half as much?
So far solar panel output per dollar has pretty much grown exponentially. What odds would you give me that this won't continue?
 
Originally Posted By: IndyIan

The cost of electricity fluctuates by the minute though, especially during the day. Solar isn't base load production, its to fill in the afternoon peaks in electricity demand where the wholesale prices are $.20-.80/kwh.


That's the theory, however the reality is that the demand comes on before the solar does and the solar stops generating before the demand drops off and this creates the "duck curve", which, in places like California and Ontario, has put greater demand and reliance on "peaker" NG GT's (which drives up prices), and which also have to step it up even further when it is a cloudy day, we are having a rain storm, snow storm....etc because solar is unreliable. And of course in the winter months, the hours of sun are far fewer.

Some more details on that here:
Link to Bloomberg article

The other issue is over-generation, which we experience here in Ontario, which results in power being sold off at a loss to the states and other provinces. At the same time we are also paying wind generator contract holders to stop their turbines when generation outpaces demand.

That's how this came about:




Originally Posted By: IndyIan
No one with solar panels is producing electricity when its cheap to buy already from under utilized base load production plants...
In a few years when panels cost half as much and energy storage is half as much, then it might be considered for base load production.


Sure they are. They produce on weekends and holidays. Long lasting, inexpensive storage will certainly help, but what needs to be factored into that also is the electrification of the automotive market. People charging their cars at home are not going to be doing so with solar. This will drive up demand during the night, when solar simply cannot provide.

The result of this will be higher energy rates.

Also, it is the reserve/peaker plants that get paid the obscenely high rates and this is due to their dispatchability. Darlington, Bruce, Pickering, Niagra Falls....etc all get paid whatever the agreed upon rate is.

There's a great little tool here:
IESO Power Data page

Which allows you to graph the power generation methods for a given time period. If you select 3-day you will see that the base load is all nuclear. On to of that, the peak loads are somewhat responded to via hydro electric but the majority of it is handled by natural gas.

Wind makes an appearance and you see a corresponding reduction in power from natural gas. The input from solar is so insignificant (despite our investment) that the line is barely visible. Then, if you click on Imports/Exports you will notice the surge in wind translates into a surge of exports. Over-generation. This is the power that gets sold at a loss and ultimately aides in driving up our bills because of rate contracts with the owners of those facilities.
 
Seems like storage is what you need to do if you have a surplus instead of giving it away. But that is not the game plan for the older established power generators. Time will change things. Cost will come down or the utilities as they are will disappear.
 
Originally Posted By: oilpsi2high
Originally Posted By: PandaBear
Originally Posted By: Jarlaxle
Originally Posted By: oilpsi2high
Have fun with the lien on your home!


Are you intoxicated?


No he is not, if you got into a solar lease or purchase agreement at a bad price, you cannot get out of it until you buy out your panel. If the new buyer are not willing to resume your agreement, you have to buy it out with your own money before you can remove the lien to sell the house.


This. Along with things like roof leaks and other failures that are inevitable down the road. Have fun removing those panels to reshingle your roof!


I've always thought that one smart idea would be for new construction to somehow incorporate the roof and solar panel into one design/component because both have a similar lifetime before they need to be replaced (~25 years).
 
I agree its far from perfect now, but I imagine a significant chunk of the cost on the peaks and on the oversupply is from fat contracts as well... A government would rather spend lots of tax dollars than play chicken with utility companies and get a brown out...

What the cheap solar panels potentially cheap home power storage do, is take away the barriers to entry for anyone to participate in the power market.
I believe that's the plan with huge battery power production in the "gigafactory". If you distribute many gigawatt hours of battery storage into the grid, most of the issues with over and under supply will disappear. A home battery array may be charging from, or discharging into the grid based on its charge level and the current pricing level, and that might change every 5 minutes at times...
Or in a decade or two, home power generation will be the norm? In rough numbers, going off grid to power my home and an electric car doesn't seem to cost much more than buying power. Another couple years and I can only see it getting cheaper.
 
Originally Posted By: oilpsi2high
Originally Posted By: PandaBear
Originally Posted By: Jarlaxle
Originally Posted By: oilpsi2high
Have fun with the lien on your home!
Are you intoxicated?
No he is not, if you got into a solar lease or purchase agreement at a bad price, you cannot get out of it until you buy out your panel. If the new buyer are not willing to resume your agreement, you have to buy it out with your own money before you can remove the lien to sell the house.
This. Along with things like roof leaks and other failures that are inevitable down the road. Have fun removing those panels to reshingle your roof!

Originally Posted By: Nate1979
I've always thought that one smart idea would be for new construction to somehow incorporate the roof and solar panel into one design/component because both have a similar lifetime before they need to be replaced (~25 years).


Quote:
Speaking to analysts and investors during the Q2 earnings call for SolarCity on August 9, Elon Musk went into detail about his plans for what he calls the “Solar Roof.” It is not a system of solar panels mounted over an existing roof but the actual roof itself. “We’re going to be making a pretty interesting product and I’m excited to kind of reveal to you all at some point. But it is not just your typical module. It is both very efficient and it looks really, really good,” said Peter Rive, SolarCity’s chief technical officer and cousin of Elon Musk.


"Solar Roof" is pretty expensive, the west and/or south facing roof may use "Solar Roof" and the north and east facing roof just use standard roofing material.

http://cleantechnica.com/2016/08/12/elon...not-solar-roof/
 
Last edited:
Originally Posted By: IndyIan
I don't know. I'm not in solar R&D... How are the next computers going to be twice as fast? Or RAM cost half as much?
So far solar panel output per dollar has pretty much grown exponentially. What odds would you give me that this won't continue?


Basically, for home solar the price is now about half roofing and installation cost and half panel materials. I don't think it will be dropping 1/2 in cost any time soon because of that, unless you put it up on the roof when you build new homes or need to reroof anyways.

Originally Posted By: OVERKILL

That's the theory, however the reality is that the demand comes on before the solar does and the solar stops generating before the demand drops off and this creates the "duck curve", which, in places like California and Ontario, has put greater demand and reliance on "peaker" NG GT's (which drives up prices), and which also have to step it up even further when it is a cloudy day, we are having a rain storm, snow storm....etc because solar is unreliable. And of course in the winter months, the hours of sun are far fewer.


In California, the peaker comes on when there is a heat storm and everyone turns on the AC. I pay 60c / kWh during 15 Smart days per summer from 2pm - 7pm (when the sun is the brightest) and in exchange save 2c / kWh the rest of the year. I don't know about you but everyone burn natural gas for heating here if they can, because at the cheaper tier 1-2 rate natural gas is about 1/5 of the cost per joule as electricity. At 80% efficiency burning gas, I'm still ahead of the game.

Then you have all these electric car charging port at work and the free electricity during work hours to charge cars, and free carpool lane access during traffic hours, even at the currently cheap $3/ gallon gas, you will not see much of a duck curve in the next 10 years.

Which comes to my next point: with a small amount of EV in the market and variable pricing of charging port, you will not see a duck curve, ever.
 
Last edited:
Originally Posted By: SHOZ
Seems like storage is what you need to do if you have a surplus instead of giving it away. But that is not the game plan for the older established power generators. Time will change things. Cost will come down or the utilities as they are will disappear.


:sigh:

and as I keep pointing out, the levelised cost of storage of current technologies is 25c/KWh round trip for even free electricity.

The biggest planned one in Ca would keep the lights on for 9 seconds.

Then you need 4,000MW of solar or wind to replace 1,000MW of coal/nukes/big hydro.

edit, just looking at the Oz morning wholesale peak prices.
Queensland - Coal - 49.5c
NSW - Coal 46.7c
Vic - Brown Coal - 45.5c
Tas - hydro, and in flood - 45.5c
S.A. - 80.0c

S.A. HAS evolved to a post brown coal (last one shut in Q2), renewable and natural gas electricity supply, and have the most expensive wholesale prices on the grid...and currently importing 575MW of brown coal electricity from another state.

Sound familiar ?
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom