Well then, allow me to break this down for you. You decided to make a single post in a thread asking for oil recommendations. In that post, you made no recommendations, added nothing of intelligible value and did not contribute to the conversation at hand in any remotely helpful, or meaningful way. Instead you chose to ask a passive-aggressive, highly effeminate question that served no legitimate good-faith purpose, but was designed only to criticize the author's lack of knowledge, in which said author had already admitted to a lack of knowledge, openly. This is a textbook definition of what would be referred to as "trolling", which is both immature and unnecessary, as it does not add to the value of the conversation, but instead only detracts from and derails the conversation away from its inital intended purpose.
And your response to this is to double down on your own condescension and mistaken assumptions about a how a complete stranger spends his free time online and what knowledge you would expect this complete stranger to possess, based on an arbitrary statistic that you've apparently assigned value to.
This would lead me into making some assumptions about the nature of your character and your likely level of personal accountability, but I'll instead reserve my judgements and assume you're just having an off day. I suspect you'll make another snide, self-justifying response, that yet again, does not contribute to the nature of the conversation, but hey, maybe I'm mistaken (only time will tell!). Either way, I don't suspect that continuing this conversation between you and I will result in the furtherance of knowledge, but will only continue to deviate from the initial purpose of the thread, so I'll be ceasing to respond and just say: good luck in all your endeavors, brother.
