Hope OVERKILL gets a voa and/or uoa on this. Maybe it won't show any strange batch control problems. It would add 1 sample to a few seen so far. At least what can be see in an oil analysis (no organic compounds show up, and most don't test for tungsten FM which Ravenol claims to use).
Its a shame because Ravenol oils on paper are great. Wonder what the odds of getting a bad batch is?
Originally Posted by oil_film_movies
Originally Posted by PWMDMD
This assumes what's in the bottle is what RAVENOL says is in the bottle. Until there's clarification I still have a bad taste over the DXG Dexos G1D2 thread.
Yes, and
https://www.bobistheoilguy.com/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/4495457/ shows only 4 ppm moly, while
https://oil-club.de/index.php?thread/1892-ravenol-ssl-0w-40/ has 54 ppm moly. Both bottles were from 2016. .....I'm not clear on why the Russian Oil Club was so distrusting of Ravenol, and makes you wonder what could be going on.
Originally Posted by claluja
Ditto. Too many wrong oils in the wrong bottles, both here and in VOAs posted on the RU forum. Has scared me away, at least for now.
I found a previous post which 'summarizes' what the Russians were saying, which happens to match the Quality Control (batch consistency & content reliability) problem found on BITOG.
https://www.bobistheoilguy.com/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/3013275/2
Originally Posted by Dmitry_K
Originally Posted by Jasper8146
Thanks very much for going to all the trouble you did to post. To make sure I understand what you said, you're saying that your experience is that Ravenol motor oils are not consistent, that in one bottle you may have good oil that meets the specifications on the bottle, but in another bottle, the oil may not be so good and may not meet the specifications listed on it?
Yes, that's right.