Mopar warranty issues w/ 0w-40 non FCA MS-12633 certification

That is a very good choice. I just double checked to make sure I am not wrong, right here: https://www.mobil.com/en/lubricants/for-personal-vehicles/our-products/products/mobil-1-fs-0w-40

It appears though that Mobil 1 0W-40 is not MS-12633 certified. The MS-A0921 is an update to the MS-12633 certification, and it is very important for HEMI engines to keep them in good running order and avoid any lifter issues.

I don't think your choice to stay with the recommended oil is silly at all. Mobil has been cheapening their product with every iteration, chasing the almighty dollar, in the name of ever-higher profits. Pennzoil has stayed the course. The Pennzoil SRT 0W-40 is a GTL formulation with extra Boron and Moly, and has stayed the same for like - forever. It's good stuff, I wouldn't hesistate to use it if I had a nice 6.4L HEMI. I would definitively not run Mobil 1 in my HEMI, for sure.
Any proof of this “cheapening”? I’d say that they make some good products, that can be had for a very reasonable price; some that hold a plethora of superior approvals as well.
 
That is a very good choice. I just double checked to make sure I am not wrong, right here: https://www.mobil.com/en/lubricants/for-personal-vehicles/our-products/products/mobil-1-fs-0w-40

It appears though that Mobil 1 0W-40 is not MS-12633 certified. The MS-A0921 is an update to the MS-12633 certification, and it is very important for HEMI engines to keep them in good running order and avoid any lifter issues.

I don't think your choice to stay with the recommended oil is silly at all. Mobil has been cheapening their product with every iteration, chasing the almighty dollar, in the name of ever-higher profits. Pennzoil has stayed the course. The Pennzoil SRT 0W-40 is a GTL formulation with extra Boron and Moly, and has stayed the same for like - forever. It's good stuff, I wouldn't hesistate to use it if I had a nice 6.4L HEMI. I would definitively not run Mobil 1 in my HEMI, for sure.
How is the MS-A0921 “very important for Hemi engines?” Specifics please. And how the Mobil 1 product would be deficient.

And also please explain how Mobil is cheapening their product. Particularly how it would impact the use of the oil in a Hemi.
 
The owner's manual is very clear that you need to run a 0W-40 motor oil that is MS-A0921 certified. If you have a warranty issue they will ask for oil receipts, and they will not like when they see Mobil 1 0W-40 there because it is not MS-A0921 certified. Only Pennzoil makes a specific MS-A0921 certified motor oil. I would not risk it and stick with the recommended motor oil. The OEM is always easier to work with when you use what they recommend. I don't think the slight savings are worth the risk.

View attachment 267738
The only thing that is "very clear" about that verbiage is they RECOMMEND a whole lot of stuff and only state you MUST use something with an API Donut Trademark. Last time I bought Mobil 1 0W40 FS it had an API label on it.
 
There is no proveable instance of somebody that has been denied a warranty with FCA/Stellantis for any oil that did not carry a MS certification when current API spec, grade and recommended change intervals were used.

I have been down this road before when I had a 2015 RAM 2500 with the 6.4.
 
Dear @dja4260, it looks like Valvoline also makes a 0W-40 that is MS-12633 and MS-A0921 certified. And as much as I like Valvoline products, I think the Pennzoil SRT 0W-40 is the better product, because it was designed for SRT vehicles and heavy abuse, but the Valvoline is also certified. So you have at least two choices that will keep your warranty intact.

1741824515378.webp


1741824543260.webp
 
Schaeffer's 9000 0w-40 is also MS-12633 & meets requirements.
Ya, but Schaeffer is expensive, very expensive, and hard to get. Buying Schaeffer deffeats the purpose of trying to save money on oil.

AMSOIL 0W-40 Signature is also MS-12633 approved, but it's not API certified, si it conflicts with warranty requirements. Sometimes the easiest and best thing to do is to comply.
 
There is no proveable instance of somebody that has been denied a warranty with FCA/Stellantis for any oil that did not carry a MS certification when current API spec, grade and recommended change intervals were used.

I have been down this road before when I had a 2015 RAM 2500 with the 6.4.

I could not find anything on the web that supports FCA/Stellantis denying a warranty due to oil not having the certicication. I simply don't want to be the first one!
 
Per owners manual the OP is good to go.

A dishonest dealer can attempt to deny warranty for whatever reason they want. Having an oil related failure and the dealer proving an oil caused the failure is essentially zero.
Dealers has no reason to be "dishonest" and deny a warranty claim. They make money on a warranty claim, just at a lower rate typically, as it is part of their dealer agreement with the manufacturer (lower labor rate and lower profit on the parts). Claims are typically denied by the manufacturer...because manufacturers keep an eye on dealer claims, as sometimes a dealer with a slow service dept may try to get unqualified claims approved to stay busy and keep their bays full. So manufacturers will often ask for more detailed information and testing to verify a higher dollar repair.
 
That 6.4 would get full syn 15w-40 if it was mine. It'd be lucky to ever see the "required" (not required) MS stuff.
 
I could not find anything on the web that supports FCA/Stellantis denying a warranty due to oil not having the certicication. I simply don't want to be the first one!
That is fine, but it has been pointed out multiple times that the language in the owners manual says an equivalent 0W-40 with the API donut listed can be used.

Just for something for you to chew on, the link below is where I talked about a video (since been deleted) back in 2015 with the RAM director of marketing and the RAM chief engineer stating that 0W-40 was not required for the RAM 6.4 and all durability testing was done with 5W-30 and conventional at that.

https://www.ramforum.com/threads/in...-the-6-4-instead-of-0w-40.75402/#post-1147036

Not stating to use 5W-30 but just giving context that chasing the MS-12633 call out on a oil bottle is more about satisfying a clerical matter than any real world need for that spec to be on a bottle label.
 
Dear @dja4260, it looks like Valvoline also makes a 0W-40 that is MS-12633 and MS-A0921 certified. And as much as I like Valvoline products, I think the Pennzoil SRT 0W-40 is the better product, because it was designed for SRT vehicles and heavy abuse, but the Valvoline is also certified. So you have at least two choices that will keep your warranty intact.

View attachment 267797

View attachment 267800
You use the word “certified” while the chart uses “recommended”. Plenty of guys here have recommended Mobil 1 FS 0W-40 too!
 
Dealers has no reason to be "dishonest" and deny a warranty claim. They make money on a warranty claim, just at a lower rate typically, as it is part of their dealer agreement with the manufacturer (lower labor rate and lower profit on the parts). Claims are typically denied by the manufacturer...because manufacturers keep an eye on dealer claims, as sometimes a dealer with a slow service dept may try to get unqualified claims approved to stay busy and keep their bays full. So manufacturers will often ask for more detailed information and testing to verify a higher dollar repair.
I worked at a GM dealer for 12 years so I know the process, even been part of several warranty denial arbitrations. Luckily the dealer I worked at was honest but we often dealt with customers that came from other dealers. Unfortunately many times dishonest dealers do tell customers dishonest things. My guess is to avoid having parts and labor almost cut in half for warranty but who knows….most customers don’t fight it. Dealers aren’t telling them they have the right to arbitration at no cost.

Either way per the OP’s owners manual he is good to run api 0w40.
 
Back
Top Bottom