The vast majority of car buyers pay no attention to CVT or non-CVT.Plus the Accord has a CVT and the Camry doesn't, and enough people have learned to avoid CVT's.
The vast majority of car buyers pay no attention to CVT or non-CVT.Plus the Accord has a CVT and the Camry doesn't, and enough people have learned to avoid CVT's.
Thankfully they have moved all of them in the shipyard - when it stops raining I’ll take a picture of new LC’s before more cute utes spoil the viewI think it's great. Competition is good for the consumer. Let the cute utes sky rocket in price and Ford can slash prices to try to recover some sales.
Exactly. They know it's an "Automatic", but beyond that, most people have no idea.The vast majority of car buyers pay no attention to CVT or non-CVT.
I was going to say, they'd only care between automatic and manual, but manuals are almost non-existent with new cars so I didn't see the point of even mentioning it.Exactly. They know it's an "Automatic", but beyond that, most people have no idea.
True.That was at a time when Ford owned Hertz, and the Taurus was a huge part of the Hertz rental fleet. It was was also sold in huge numbers at fleet sale prices to other car rental companies.
People have mostly stopped buying Nissans because of CVT's. I'd have to think that enough people know.The vast majority of car buyers pay no attention to CVT or non-CVT.
The Nissan Rogue (#8 on the list) still being on it's way down? It's a CVT.People have mostly stopped buying Nissans because of CVT's. I'd have to think that enough people know.
lots of people want sedans... unfortunately most of them aren't solvent enough to buy a new car, stuck in the used game.Corolla and Civic are trailing, no surprise, who wants an sedan, let alone an econobox one?
but if RAV4 went up 9% in sales those two went up 20+%. I wouldn't say the market is shifting towards econoboxes but might affordability be a factor?
I've seen multiple reasons (lack of new models, lack of hybrids, etc) but CVT is not attributed to their decline by industry folks.People have mostly stopped buying Nissans because of CVT's.
Think it is the dealers who want some differentiation.Of course you need to add all GM's trucks together, and of course it's just marketing.
All GM has to do is make a new series, call it "G series" and put the two 1500's in it. Boom, "G series is best selling product in America".
The differences between them are the same differences you find within the same lineup; IE a High Country is more different from an LT, than an AT4 is from a Trailboss. It's skin deep, and just different features, pricing, and a different front grill.
GM has been outselling Ford since 2019.
Personally I find the 5.0 F150 a nice truck, and I'd definitely put it on my list if I needed to replace mine. The 10 speed would worry me most though.
I miss station wagons... don't mind the sedan, wouldn't mind getting another gen 4 Camry, but I also miss the large trunk that a small station wagon can have. No AWD stuff to complicate things. Simplicity. Oh well, that day came and went.lots of people want sedans... unfortunately most of them aren't solvent enough to buy a new car, stuck in the used game.
CVT is cited in the comments section many times in every YouTube video about this. The media people reporting on this aren't car people and are simply parroting Nissan who refuses to admit that it's their CVT's.I've seen multiple reasons (lack of new models, lack of hybrids, etc) but CVT is not attributed to their decline by industry folks.
Civic and Corolla are bouncing back from a couple really low years after the pandemic, but even at +21% and +22% they are both way, way WAY behind where the sales numbers were a decade or so ago. I tend to think all those CUVs have taken away a lot of sedan sales.Corolla and Civic are trailing, no surprise, who wants an sedan, let alone an econobox one?
but if RAV4 went up 9% in sales those two went up 20+%. I wouldn't say the market is shifting towards econoboxes but might affordability be a factor?
True.
And RAV4s are part of a large market of rental fleets also. Both commercial fleets and corporate fleets.
Exactly! It is a known fact that SUV's/CUV's have indeed stolen the sales of the mainstream sedans especially the "midsize family sedan" category. The "compact sedan" category is taking a hit as well and the car companies are building what is selling most as they're is a higher profit in them. The largest sellers, category-wise are the "compact" CUV category...if you can call them compact!I tend to think all those CUVs have taken away a lot of sedan sales.
I don’t understand the hate against CUV’s?
Is this the new old man yelling at clouds?
The C is for crossover. Based on it being on a unibody type drivetrain vs a truck / frame drivetrain. Generically.At least you may know what the acronym CUV means, because this old man doesn’t!
Not going to yell at clouds however…I simply can’t keep up with all of this stuff. I don’t let it bother me. I buy what works for me, whether SUV or CUV or UFO
My guess is the first letter is “compact” or “car-style” or some such. Since that’s what they seem to be in my opinion.
The newer RAV4’s shape is verging on what we referred to as a hatchback 40 years ago. I remember when VW Rabbits and Dodge Omnis were absolutely everywhere— admit it, the silhouette of the RAV is heading in that direction.