Originally Posted By: pottymouth
I don't get all the controversy here. Chrysler generously donates vehicles to this school, one being a Viper. The agreement has a provision that allows them to demand the vehicle be destroyed. Chrysler has chosen to use that provision.
The school should simply comply with Chrysler's request and be done with it. Let's keep in mind that the car would likely have been destroyed by Chrysler years before if it had not been loaned to the school. Just like so many other pre-production vehicles.
Exactly! Sometimes in this country we seem to treat a car as more significant than it is.
I don't get all the controversy here. Chrysler generously donates vehicles to this school, one being a Viper. The agreement has a provision that allows them to demand the vehicle be destroyed. Chrysler has chosen to use that provision.
The school should simply comply with Chrysler's request and be done with it. Let's keep in mind that the car would likely have been destroyed by Chrysler years before if it had not been loaned to the school. Just like so many other pre-production vehicles.
Exactly! Sometimes in this country we seem to treat a car as more significant than it is.