I recently purchased a new 2005 Toyota Camry and was somewhat amazed at the lack of recommended maintenance for it (as prescribed in the provided Scheduled Maintenance Guide).
For example; the first recommended air filter change is at 30,000 miles/36 months. Now the manual does recommend inspection every 5K/6 months, ONLY if you "drive in desert or on dirt roads." I can't recall any manufacturers that didn't recommend an annual air filter change regardless of the conditions the vehicle is driven in.
Also, no recommended brake fluid changes. Though we now have long-life antifreeze, I don't believe we have long-life brake fluid, even if it's available no mention by Toyota that they use it. My 2001 Odyssey manual recommended brake fluid inspections/changes every 36K.
Toyota also doesn't recommend any transmission fluid changes, (automatic 5-speed).
I realize my thinking on this subject reflects conventional, and perhaps dated, thought. However, my concern is this ... I don't have a problem with longer recommended mnx intervals if the technology has improved to the point that longer intervals are now logical (example long-life antifreeze), but to the best of my knowledge none of the above mentioned mnx items have experienced significant advances in technology and thus don't support the longer recommended intervals.
For example; the first recommended air filter change is at 30,000 miles/36 months. Now the manual does recommend inspection every 5K/6 months, ONLY if you "drive in desert or on dirt roads." I can't recall any manufacturers that didn't recommend an annual air filter change regardless of the conditions the vehicle is driven in.
Also, no recommended brake fluid changes. Though we now have long-life antifreeze, I don't believe we have long-life brake fluid, even if it's available no mention by Toyota that they use it. My 2001 Odyssey manual recommended brake fluid inspections/changes every 36K.
Toyota also doesn't recommend any transmission fluid changes, (automatic 5-speed).
I realize my thinking on this subject reflects conventional, and perhaps dated, thought. However, my concern is this ... I don't have a problem with longer recommended mnx intervals if the technology has improved to the point that longer intervals are now logical (example long-life antifreeze), but to the best of my knowledge none of the above mentioned mnx items have experienced significant advances in technology and thus don't support the longer recommended intervals.