OK, ALCOA is offering my married wife a pre-retirement pension buyout.
(Apparently the people 'explaining' things did not even see the forms sent out!)
A QPSA (apparently a monthly reduction) is listed before the various monthly selections, including no survivor, 75, and 50% - as though it becomes a reduction in all cases for her.
Then they list the buyout, as though the QPSA reduction is part of the buyout equation.
So it lists:
A full retirement benefit $,
a early reduction benefit $ (minus a few %),
a QPSA reduction $, (say $100, seems to reduce all below),
0, 75, 50% survivor option benefit $
then the buyout $.
We trying really hard to understand, it seems like a penalty for having been married, but there have been no questions about continuity of marriage, etc to develop a cost(?).
They do seem to want to charge for it, forever (?).
I can almost understand an annuity-like 'cost' to providing a pre-retirement chance of a benefit (so as to NOT penalize singles), but then wouldn't that be a fixable cost (at actual retirement) that would eventually time out? (Like say $100 from the next 20 years' payments, then NOT reduced?)
Anyone?
(Apparently the people 'explaining' things did not even see the forms sent out!)
A QPSA (apparently a monthly reduction) is listed before the various monthly selections, including no survivor, 75, and 50% - as though it becomes a reduction in all cases for her.
Then they list the buyout, as though the QPSA reduction is part of the buyout equation.
So it lists:
A full retirement benefit $,
a early reduction benefit $ (minus a few %),
a QPSA reduction $, (say $100, seems to reduce all below),
0, 75, 50% survivor option benefit $
then the buyout $.
We trying really hard to understand, it seems like a penalty for having been married, but there have been no questions about continuity of marriage, etc to develop a cost(?).
They do seem to want to charge for it, forever (?).
I can almost understand an annuity-like 'cost' to providing a pre-retirement chance of a benefit (so as to NOT penalize singles), but then wouldn't that be a fixable cost (at actual retirement) that would eventually time out? (Like say $100 from the next 20 years' payments, then NOT reduced?)
Anyone?