Too thin a 30 for me in the summer.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
QHorsepower 5W30
- Thread starter 21Rouge
- Start date
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
Originally Posted By: Ben99GT
Originally Posted By: Carzzz
any recent VOA of PP?
Plenty of used oil analysis, Pennzoil Platinum 5w30 contains more calcium and boron.
So for ottotheclown, Quaker State Q Horsepower is not the same as PP.
I bet it's very close, though...
Originally Posted By: Carzzz
any recent VOA of PP?
Plenty of used oil analysis, Pennzoil Platinum 5w30 contains more calcium and boron.
So for ottotheclown, Quaker State Q Horsepower is not the same as PP.
I bet it's very close, though...
At $8 for a five quart jug, this stuff was an absolute steal!
Originally Posted By: Nickdfresh
At $8 for a five quart jug, this stuff was an absolute steal!
hehe, you got that right! I snagged a bunch with that rebate too! After seeing this excellent VOA im am happy I have 30qts worth of this in the garage.
At $8 for a five quart jug, this stuff was an absolute steal!
hehe, you got that right! I snagged a bunch with that rebate too! After seeing this excellent VOA im am happy I have 30qts worth of this in the garage.
Originally Posted By: Jehartley
So, is this now called Enhanced Durability? Because I can't find QHorsepower on Quakers website.
Q Horsepower is now Ultimate Durability.
Advanced Durability = Dino
Enhanced Durability = Blend
Ultimate Durability = Synthetic
The Ultimate bottle even says Q Horsepower in small print on the front.
So, is this now called Enhanced Durability? Because I can't find QHorsepower on Quakers website.
Q Horsepower is now Ultimate Durability.
Advanced Durability = Dino
Enhanced Durability = Blend
Ultimate Durability = Synthetic
The Ultimate bottle even says Q Horsepower in small print on the front.
I recently had an UOA of Quaker State conventional done by OAI and it had much more boron and moly. I've been using the QS for awhile so the moly and boron had to have come from the QS. I know it wasn't Quaker State Horsepower, but it seems like it would have as much moly and boron as Quaker State conventional. Maybe a bad assumption but do we know if Quaker State Horsepower would have less? If not, I wouldn't put it past B-stone just giving known old, generic numbers for Quaker State Horsepower and not even testing the sample.
Originally Posted By: mechanicx
I recently had an UOA of Quaker State conventional done by OAI and it had much more boron and moly. I've been using the QS for awhile so the moly and boron had to have come from the QS. I know it wasn't Quaker State Horsepower, but it seems like it would have as much moly and boron as Quaker State conventional. Maybe a bad assumption but do we know if Quaker State Horsepower would have less? If not, I wouldn't put it past B-stone just giving known old, generic numbers for Quaker State Horsepower and not even testing the sample.
What makes you believe Blackstone would do that?
I recently had an UOA of Quaker State conventional done by OAI and it had much more boron and moly. I've been using the QS for awhile so the moly and boron had to have come from the QS. I know it wasn't Quaker State Horsepower, but it seems like it would have as much moly and boron as Quaker State conventional. Maybe a bad assumption but do we know if Quaker State Horsepower would have less? If not, I wouldn't put it past B-stone just giving known old, generic numbers for Quaker State Horsepower and not even testing the sample.
What makes you believe Blackstone would do that?
Originally Posted By: mechanicx
I recently had an UOA of Quaker State conventional done by OAI and it had much more boron and moly. I've been using the QS for awhile so the moly and boron had to have come from the QS. I know it wasn't Quaker State Horsepower, but it seems like it would have as much moly and boron as Quaker State conventional. Maybe a bad assumption but do we know if Quaker State Horsepower would have less? If not, I wouldn't put it past B-stone just giving known old, generic numbers for Quaker State Horsepower and not even testing the sample.
That's why you don't tell the the oil or even the grade. Make them determine it from their tests. If they give you numbers that are completely bogus. Ask them to retest.
I recently had an UOA of Quaker State conventional done by OAI and it had much more boron and moly. I've been using the QS for awhile so the moly and boron had to have come from the QS. I know it wasn't Quaker State Horsepower, but it seems like it would have as much moly and boron as Quaker State conventional. Maybe a bad assumption but do we know if Quaker State Horsepower would have less? If not, I wouldn't put it past B-stone just giving known old, generic numbers for Quaker State Horsepower and not even testing the sample.
That's why you don't tell the the oil or even the grade. Make them determine it from their tests. If they give you numbers that are completely bogus. Ask them to retest.
Originally Posted By: sunfire
Originally Posted By: mechanicx
I recently had an used oil analysis of Quaker State conventional done by OAI and it had much more boron and moly. I've been using the QS for awhile so the moly and boron had to have come from the QS. I know it wasn't Quaker State Horsepower, but it seems like it would have as much moly and boron as Quaker State conventional. Maybe a bad assumption but do we know if Quaker State Horsepower would have less? If not, I wouldn't put it past B-stone just giving known old, generic numbers for Quaker State Horsepower and not even testing the sample.
That's why you don't tell the the oil or even the grade. Make them determine it from their tests. If they give you numbers that are completely bogus. Ask them to retest.
Yeah good point. In the case of my used oil analysis, OAI didn't know it was Quaker State. The form asked for the manufacture of the oil and I wrote in SOPUS lol.
Originally Posted By: mechanicx
I recently had an used oil analysis of Quaker State conventional done by OAI and it had much more boron and moly. I've been using the QS for awhile so the moly and boron had to have come from the QS. I know it wasn't Quaker State Horsepower, but it seems like it would have as much moly and boron as Quaker State conventional. Maybe a bad assumption but do we know if Quaker State Horsepower would have less? If not, I wouldn't put it past B-stone just giving known old, generic numbers for Quaker State Horsepower and not even testing the sample.
That's why you don't tell the the oil or even the grade. Make them determine it from their tests. If they give you numbers that are completely bogus. Ask them to retest.
Yeah good point. In the case of my used oil analysis, OAI didn't know it was Quaker State. The form asked for the manufacture of the oil and I wrote in SOPUS lol.
Nice VOA I just bit the bullet and picked up a quart for the lawnmower.
Looks alot like PP.. Minus the Boron.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
Similar threads
- Replies
- 36
- Views
- 2K
- Replies
- 14
- Views
- 716
- Replies
- 2
- Views
- 301