Wanted to do a particle count on the Purolator BOSS PBL14476 filter. Just to see how it filters. Took a sample at 500 miles. The next one will be when the filter has 8,500 miles on it using HPL Premium Plus 5W-20. Seems to do a decent job.
It doesn't look bad, but it only has 500 miles on the oil. You could put new oil in an engine and run it 500 miles with just a screen for an oil filter and probably have a PC that doesn't look too bad. Like I've mentioned in other threads about PC data, to get a real apples-to-apples comparison of in field filter performance using an ISO 4406 particle count, the filters need to ideally be ran on the same engine and basically used in the same conditions for the same OCI. As the miles get put on the oil more debris is generated, and the lower micron size levels should start increasing because filters are less efficient at capturing the smaller stuff, and less efficient filters may also slough off debris with loading dP - a more inefficient filter will show that. This all points back to the reasons to use a high efficiency oil filter for longer OCIs. PS - Yes, the ISO 4406 particle count is the number of particles per mL of oil.Thanks for UOA and particle count testing. It’s not too often that people get this done, but I’m wondering about your comment that that filter is doing a good job… @ZeeOSix can you confirm? Based on this page from Donaldson, it appears you’ve got somewhere between 4 million and 8 million particles per 100mL if I’m reading this table correctly… like I said I may be off but generally speaking the Boss is not considered premium filtration.
Thanks for testing at 500. I'll patiently wait for your 8500 mile results w/HPL 5w-20.![]()
Thanks. Like I said, it’s been awhile since we discussed particle counts. Didn’t want to jump off the deep end without a refresher from somebody more knowledgeable.It doesn't look bad, but it only has 500 miles on the oil. You could put new oil in an engine and run it 500 miles with just a screen for an oil filter and probably have a PC that doesn't look too bad. Like I've mentioned in other threads about PC data, to get a real apples-to-apples comparison of in field filter performance using an ISO 4406 particle count, the filters need to ideally be ran on the same engine and basically used in the same conditions for the same OCI. As the miles get put on the oil more debris is generated, and the lower micron size levels should start increasing because filters are less efficient at capturing the smaller stuff, and less efficient filters may also slough off debris with loading dP - a more inefficient filter will show that. This all points back to the reasons to use a high efficiency oil filter for longer OCIs. PS - Yes, the ISO 4406 particle count is the number of particles per mL of oil.
Nice! The next particle count will tell more. Just understand that because it’s a purolator no matter how great it might preform, around here it will be minimized and or overlooked.Wanted to do a particle count on the Purolator BOSS PBL14476 filter. Just to see how it filters. Took a sample at 500 miles. The next one will be when the filter has 8,500 miles on it using HPL Premium Plus 5W-20. Seems to do a decent job.
View attachment 229848
I’d love to see this done with say the Boss and one of the microglass Donaldson’s, and against the Endurance as well.
Although you’re not going to get an accurate representation of the filter by using the magnets. If you want to get the best data, you’d run almost your full OCI on filter alone & pull sample. Then add magnets and pull another sample 500 miles later. That way you can separate the effect of the magnets vs the filter itself. You may well find that the magnets are more effective on some filters than others… I’d bet the less-efficient filters would end up with more on the magnet, but that’s a WAG at this point.I'm gonna do some particle analysis with different filters running to 10k with the HPL oil stash.
Whats on the list of filters I plan running with magnetic assisted filtration using N42SH bars and SmCo disc, keep in mind these are oversize from the OEM size which is the YZZN1 / Fram 4967
P551132
FE3600
FS3600
LF16011
MSL51516
I'm not sure if I want to run a PBL20195 to 10k though I wait for OP results as I do care a lot to keep my daily in top condition.
Well to be honest nothing at the moment. Stocked up on that $25 5w-40 Mobil Euro Walmart glitch.What you using HPL oil in Justin?
OP: thanks for doing this. Good info
Well to be honest nothing at the moment. Stocked up on that $25 5w-40 Mobil Euro Walmart glitch.Plus about x2 Mobil Delvac 15w40 in 5 gallon buckets. Think you've run some HPL right?
It took almost 3 weeksLooking forward to see how the Donaldson P551132 particle count compares when I sample it at 10k. I'm a few hundred miles away and probably reach it in the next week or two.
How fast was the turnaround at Blackstone?
3 weeks is a very long time, WearCheck only took 2 days from the day it arrived to their lab.It took almost 3 weeks
Using the magnets could skew the actual performance of the filter to some degree, especially if a pretty inefficient filter is ran. A high efficiency filter that can capture a good percentage of 5u particles would probably show better performance than an inefficient filter without magnets in the mix.Whats on the list of filters I plan running with magnetic assisted filtration using N42SH bars and SmCo disc, keep in mind these are oversize from the OEM size which is the YZZN1 / Fram 4967