Originally Posted By: The Critic
I fail to understand the purpose of this alert. These oils are clearly labeled to state that they do not meet the latest API SN/ILSAC GF-5 requirements, so why bother testing them? It is up to the consumer's responsibility to read the label before using the product.
On the other hand, I think the intended purpose of PQIA is to test the quality of oils that do claim to meet API SN/ILSAC GF-5, so that it can be confirmed that those oils are actually what they claim to be. We should be more concerned about those oils since there is a far greater potential of damage.
PQIA’s mission is to serve the consumer of lubricants by monitoring and reporting on the quality of lubricants in the marketplace. It has nothing to do with the API Service Classifications.
The best way to serve consumers is to alert them to the deceptive and damaging products sitting on shelves across the country alongside quality oils. The fact that the label states “SC” on the back label does not excuse claims like “Protects the vital parts of your engine,” and “Combats rust and corrosion,” and “Works throughout a wide range of operating temperatures,” when in fact it does none of these things. Further, this oil is not a 5w30 and does not even meet SC as it has no ZDDP or detergents.
The greatest danger to consumers, especially those who buy on price, is the proliferation of SA and other obsolete oils masquerading as quality motor oils. Not all consumers are as educated as BITOGers. People buy these oils and they sell in very high volumes. PQIA is trying to help these consumers.
Tom NJ