Originally Posted By: tig1
Originally Posted By: Christopher Hussey
So what is the theories as to why M1 is noisier? Considering it is thicker than PP at operating temp?
Quantitative data would be nice.
Of course a number of posters here claim just the opposite. M1 being the quiter oil.
A number of posters here? Fair enough. Maybe 5. Almost every post I read that has anything to do with mobil 1,the poster claims more harmonics(great term) using mobil 1.
If you are going to copy and paste don't pick and choose the data,actually post what's really out there.
If I were to guess I would go as far as 75% of posts on mobil 1 claim more noise.
I find it funny that you would post this since there is an overwhelming majority that claims more noise.
Not saying that more noise equates to more wear,even though the uoa that I've seen using mobil 1 have had high metal reading but over the lifespan of an engine I think it's irrelevant. More relevant would be the maintenance schedule,not the brand of oil used.
Originally Posted By: Christopher Hussey
So what is the theories as to why M1 is noisier? Considering it is thicker than PP at operating temp?
Quantitative data would be nice.
Of course a number of posters here claim just the opposite. M1 being the quiter oil.
A number of posters here? Fair enough. Maybe 5. Almost every post I read that has anything to do with mobil 1,the poster claims more harmonics(great term) using mobil 1.
If you are going to copy and paste don't pick and choose the data,actually post what's really out there.
If I were to guess I would go as far as 75% of posts on mobil 1 claim more noise.
I find it funny that you would post this since there is an overwhelming majority that claims more noise.
Not saying that more noise equates to more wear,even though the uoa that I've seen using mobil 1 have had high metal reading but over the lifespan of an engine I think it's irrelevant. More relevant would be the maintenance schedule,not the brand of oil used.