PP 46% sludge cleanup claim is it really special?

Status
Not open for further replies.
It's creative marketing IMO, which every oil company is guilty of... 4x better wear protection, Removes 46% sludge in the first... Blah Blah Blah... "Buy our product because we are superior than the rest" nonsense.

Again I will say... If you got sludge, you got other problems and shouldn't be relying on Pennzoil to cure them!

Would you put a bandage on a gushing severed artery? No you would fix the problem properly (at least I would hope), and put a bandage over it to help it along.

So in effect their claim while tested in a lab and true, 1 doesn't apply to most vehicles on the road, and 2 shouldn't be used as a cure-all for sludgers IMO. Or every car company would be running extreme oil temps and calling for Pennzoil.

Pennzoil is great stuff and I would use it in a heartbeat but that claim of 46% is hooey and they know they are praying on peoples guilt factor. That being "Don't you want the best for your vehicle?" and the notion that people need to think they are solving a problem (they don't really have) and somehow outdoing the rest by using Pennzoil Platinum.

As far as I'm concerned they can go back to the commercial where the guy had the pistons inside his chest and they were claiming performance you can feel. Instead of clean 46% of the peanut butter goo inside your engine with just one change.
wink.gif


OK I'm off the Soap-Box who's next?
 
Last edited:
My thinking is that since Pennzoil states a cleaning percentage for their dino, and another better percentage for their full synthetic, it most likely is better concerning internal engine cleaning. The bottom line is that PP is probably pretty good in this respect.

The area of prime concern for me is the rings and lands .
 
Originally Posted By: ArrestMeRedZ
Well, you do know that 72% of all statistics are made up on the spot.
crackmeup2.gif



I don't know that to be true. I do know that 4 out of 3 people have trouble with fractions.
 
67.2% of false claims are true when Farmers in Iowa plant corn on Tuesdays while there's a apple pie in the oven.

Pennzoil, the new scrubby bubbles. Only works after you've gone 20,000 miles without changing oil, 3 quarts low and live in the Sierra Nevada Desert.

Gotta love creative marketing off of the worste case test Chemists/R&B Engineering has ever done.
 
Originally Posted By: Lorenzo
I have up to $1 million in my pocket right now.


Well lets see 46% of 1 million is $460,000. Hey I can clean you out of $460,000... :)
 
I use PP and it did clean up my Honda CRV nicely in 3 OCI's. Not sure about the 46% but I do have 17% fewer cavaties since I started using it....
29.gif
 
"Up to 46%" is just a play on words, since if it only removes 0%, they are meeting their claim. Now if it said "removes a minimum of 46%", that would be something to boast about! They're really just trying to take advantage of the dyslexic.
 
As a true Pennzoil lover, but above all someone who believes in brutal honesty, these goofy claims like the 46% and the "active molocules" make me cringe. I realize though that they have to grab attention in a very crowded competitive market where most of the competition makes similar goofy claims. I don't condone it, but I do understand it
 
Originally Posted By: deven
Originally Posted By: Lorenzo
I have up to $1 million in my pocket right now.


Well lets see 46% of 1 million is $460,000. Hey I can clean you out of $460,000... :)
I am sending you up to $460,000!
 
Originally Posted By: glxpassat
"Up to 46%" is just a play on words, since if it only removes 0%, they are meeting their claim. Now if it said "removes a minimum of 46%", that would be something to boast about! They're really just trying to take advantage of the dyslexic.


It's absolutely a play on words with a built in plausible deniability. But I do believe Pennzoil Platinum did some cleaning in my engine, especially when I added a pint of MMO for the last 500 or so miles...

I have no way of knowing what the % was LOL.
 
LOL 'up to' 46% - marketing straight from The Simpsons:

"Our product has a certain percentage of post-consumer recycled material in it"
"And what percentage is that?"
"Zero! Zero's a percentage, right?"
 
As long as they used the term up to, they should have said 99%. The number means nothing.

AD
 
It's kind of like someone I work with who claims Walmart is always cheapest because they say "always low prices." I can't get her to understand that "low" is meaningless. It has no benchmark, i.e., what is "low?" Yes they are often lowest but not always. *Sigh*

John
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom