Denso here says their IK20L lasts 30K miles. Click on "Product Specifications".Odd I thought iridium plugs lasted for 80k+ miles?
https://www.densoproducts.com/denso-5358-ik20l-iridium-power-spark-plug#productSpecifications
Denso here says their IK20L lasts 30K miles. Click on "Product Specifications".Odd I thought iridium plugs lasted for 80k+ miles?
hmm would ik20TT be compatible and would they be better / last longer too?Denso here says their IK20L lasts 30K miles. Click on "Product Specifications".
https://www.densoproducts.com/denso-5358-ik20l-iridium-power-spark-plug#productSpecifications
those twin tips are compatible with sk20r11 and the IK20L. They should last longer than 80K miles.hmm would ik20TT be compatible and would they be better / last longer too?
Yes I noticed the chamfer too, maybe it's the ground wearing away?those twin tips are compatible with sk20r11 and the IK20L. They should last longer than 80K miles.
The ends of the ground electrodes facing the center electrode in your IK20s look to me to have a slight chamfer not found in Denso plugs in their website pics. Thus accounting for my perception of a spark gap bigger than what they were originally (0.043"). Just to be sure, check them out with a feeler gauge.
After seeing your plugs, I would not suspect anything wrong with your injectors. Why not change your plugs and be done with it? They are not expensive and can eliminate a possible suspect in your chase for the source of your engine trouble code.Yes I noticed the chamfer too, maybe it's the ground wearing away?
I was expecting to see plugs totally wet on the tips or fully black which may have pointed to the injectors leaking but now I dunno what to make of it.
Does not look like old plugs to me. 3 are coated with carbon from running rich. The other I don't know. None of the electrodes show significant signs of aging. The center electrode still has the proper shape, and the ground electrode is coated not worn.Ok understood. I thought the plugs had another 10k in them at least. Guess I could change them too, they have lasted 10 years so far.
Great job. Mission accomplished.So we have an update now since the maf clean and filter change.
Idle maf reading has now dropped, before it used to be 2.78g/s but now it's 2.0g/s at idle and ltft at idle is now -9.4 and as revs go up it's getting closer to 0 now. So looks like it's going in the right direction.
The eml is still on and I won't reset it yet but will check readings again at the end if the week and see if there is further change to the readings.
I'm gonna need to change air filter soon iv got an old k&n panel filter in which lets in too much dirt and kills engines over time from what iv read and seen (projectfarm tests).
View attachment 312920
View attachment 312921
View attachment 312922
View attachment 312923
MAF (And / or MAP if so equipped) sensor reads air coming in, the ECU maps the amount of fuel based on that air flow and some other things (like engine temp and who knows what else)I wonder if it was the maf sensor itself or the connector. Since I cleaned the connector at the same time too.
The difference in idle flow from 2.78g/s to 2.04g/s is roughly 30%. Which now makes sense on the LTFT at idle being -30 and engine light to be on. The numbers were still fluctuating but did see it drop to 1.9ish too so those saying airflow should be 1g/s per litre of displacement seems to be correct, so my one should be closer to 1.8g/s being a 1.8l engine but not sure at what Rpm that amount at idle is rated at.
Will monitor the trims on Friday and see how they are. Got original Toyota air filter in order too so will replace the k&n one when it arrives, hopefully by the weekend.
This is the first time iv ever seen a maf sensor over read the estimated airflow. Every other time iv seen one fail is always resulted in under reading the airflow rate.
So is this how the system works? ECU first gets a maf reading then throws in the correct amount of fuel it believes should be going in for the reported air flow and then the O2 sensor fine tunes it based in what it sees coming out the exhaust?
STFT are irrelevant in your case.Checked trims today, at idle showing -10.7. at 2200rpm LTFT and stft are 0ish. So that's a massive improvement of where it would sit at -11 at 4500rpm previously to cleaning maf and changing filter.
Anything I should check that can cause the negative trim at idle? It's around 8c here temp wise too. Checked trims after car was driven for 20mins. Even revving to 1200 rpm gets LTFT down to -6 and stft is +/-3
The plugs are likely fine, but likely need to burn off a bit, so that might take some miles.Not replaced the plugs yet. Raining all this week so will avoid car work.
It's got a k&n panel filter in it at the moment till my new paper filter arrives. Dunno if k&n filter can affect idle richness.
2 stroke oil still in the tank so waiting for that to go through the system before switching the plugs. Car is at 96k miles was hoping to switch the plugs when I get to an even 100k miles.