Originally Posted By: eljefino
By year 2000 ford knew the taurus trannies were junk... so they rigged the powertrain controls to cut engine power mid-shift. End result a quasi reliable car.
Look under the plastic rocker panel covers for rust on the metal rockers. This goes for panthers as well.
This could be a car that has so many examples, and so little demand, you could get a good one for $1k-1500.
Of course I had a 96 that was a rolling disaster, probably due to previously delayed/deferred maintenance and my desire for perfection, eg, radiators that don't leak etc.
What's the emissions inspection where you live? The pre 96s might get a pass if it's OBD-II only, or an (evil) tailpipe sniffer only if that old.
I would still try to get a year 2000 example; a 90-ish accord may have been great in its day but brittle wiring connectors and hard rubber affects every car. That dealer that wouldn't fix the clunk or the bad belts sounds as shady as they come.
I do see quite a few nice Taurus/Sable examples, but they often have high miles which scares me with the transmissions. I have read about quite a few early failures for years after 2000 on the 'net. We will not rule out a clean, low mileage one if it comes up.
They live in the Hudson Valley region of NY state. I think their emissions check does not include a tailpipe probe, but a lit CEL will fail.