Opinions on Synthetic Oil?

Status
Not open for further replies.
There are several brands that could "pass" the NOACK requirements for DEXOS-1.

Also I do not understand what DEXOS has in common with the quoted post.
 
Originally Posted By: blackman777
Originally Posted By: labnerd
Synthetic base oils adds stability to any motor oil. This allows the car maker to recommend longer drain intervals- that's about it. No synthetic base oil has more lubricity than a conventional oil.....


I notice that no conventional oil has passed the DEXOS 1 or 2 certification (for use in GM cars).


I believe the GM "dexos" AC delo oil is a synthetic blend.
 
Originally Posted By: lubedude13
$14 per quart for amsoil isn't true more like $10 a quart and if you're changing oil 10k or less then YES it is probably overkill. That's where amsoil signature is marketed for those that go longer than 10k. If you are going 5-7.5k intervals about any will be fine but my recommendations for over the counter oils would be Pennzoil or kendall


Not even $10; try $4.70 per quart bottle (less per quart in larger sizes) for Amsoil OE 5w30 as a preferred customer.
 
Originally Posted By: Kuato
Originally Posted By: lubedude13
$14 per quart for amsoil isn't true more like $10 a quart and if you're changing oil 10k or less then YES it is probably overkill. That's where amsoil signature is marketed for those that go longer than 10k. If you are going 5-7.5k intervals about any will be fine but my recommendations for over the counter oils would be Pennzoil or kendall


Not even $10; try $4.70 per quart bottle (less per quart in larger sizes) for Amsoil OE 5w30 as a preferred customer.


Yup
thumbsup2.gif
Being a PC is awsome!
 
Originally Posted By: nleksan
A) Extended OCI are economically WORSE based on the ever increasing chances of engine damage, especially in cars that aren't driven at length or driven hard, due to fuel and water dilution

That is going to be extremely hard to quantify. For one, a reasoned extension of an OCI isn't the same as neglect. If one is driving hard or not getting the oil up to temperatures, then the OCI must be reconsidered because of that. Secondly, a lot of extended drains are done in commercial environments, and they do pay off.
 
Originally Posted By: nleksan
I am speaking only to my experiences, and to the cars I've seen and/or worked on.

The biggest issues are:
A) Extended OCI are economically WORSE based on the ever increasing chances of engine damage, especially in cars that aren't driven at length or driven hard, due to fuel and water dilution
B) Every single S54 rod bearing failure I've seen outside of the tracked cars (and every single owner who tracks their car KNOWS and prepares for that and a few other items), comes from cars that are running extended OCI's and most all barely ever get the oil to temp

The reason I advocate for ester and PAO oils is because, in my experience, they have held up better under immensely greater stresses than any Street car will see, they will not be the cause of sludge in an engine and actually are the easiest and likely safest way to clean a sludge engine, and because they have shown greatly reduced wear levels across the board, on parts that are making constant, significant metal to metal contact, including cam lobes and crank rod bearings and rod bearing journals.

Just because my track AND Street cars have benefited from them, it doesn't mean that the benefits are exclusive, and that a "regular" daily driver won't benefit.
In fact, since my friend has offered Redline at no charge over BMW Synthetic, every car that's switched has been a non-M (TWS still used for M), and at least 95 percent are DD's, as evidenced by the multiple changes per year (2-3). Yet, across the board costs of ownership have decreased for the owners, PCV systems are not going bad, VANOS failures are down, and dirty engines are cleaner. That's first hand experience from over a hundred samples, all running Redline (0w30 to 5w40) with OCI between 4500 and 8200 miles.
Keep in mind also that, well, how many mechanics who run their own small shops do you know that would advocate a change to an oil with the hopes that it would REDUCE the amount of work he sees for big issues, and therefore decreases the amount of money he makes? Sure, he has increased the total income specifically regarding oil changes, but this guy cares more about his customers than his wallet, and the COST for him to do a change with BMW SYN is a l ittle over half of what it is for him to do it with Redline, and he's only making about $20 or so for an oil change plus inspection (for an hour labor from a master mechanic, 20 bucks is about a third what they're worth). Sure, he makes it almost twice as often, but I promise that's pretty much irrelevant.

Also, like I said, these cars are not just daily driven, they're all out of warranty, with miles ranging from 75k or so up to 392,000 ('89 325iS manual, only had its original clutch changed out 40k ago!). They're all at the point where wear would be very likely to show itself.


I suggest reading the info that the society of automotive engineers published in their white papers and dnewton has so kindly included in his write ups on the home page of this site when it comes to oil change intervals in relation to wear.
I read your first paragraph and didn't even bother with the rest.
Your observations are nothing when compared to the S.A.E. And they don't agree with you,so suffice it to say your posts should come with a disclaimer reading "for entertainment use only"
 
I believe that I did state multiple times that it was "my opinion" and "in my experience", and never said that it was to be taken as gospel.

After all, what is this site, heck what is a scientific (or pseudoscientific) study if not a collection of experiences analyzed and from which a conclusion, or opinion, is drawn?

I have simply found something that works for me, and while the conditions under which most of the mileage is acquired is orders of magnitude more sever than many, actually most, people will ever subject a vehicle to, even on an enthusiasts forum such as this, I prefer to see it less as outlier data and more "if it can withstand this condition, which is exponentially more stressful on everything involved, then it is more than just sufficient for the 99.5pct of people who drive only on public roads, rarely if ever exceed the midway point in the tach, and so firth".
I mean, I would expect that an oil which retains its HTHS after 400+ miles of driving, nonstop, in an environment where the forces between parts are between 2 and 20x greater than "normal driving", at a constant 6-8krpm, with in excess of 1bar of boost over ambient increasing cylinder pressure and the significant increase in fuel to maintain AFR, all would indicate that the lubricant would exceed the needs of anyone driving below that level, in engines with far less mechanical stress AND tolerances at least 2x greater...

I mean, almost all engine technology is derived from Formula One (not NASCAR) because the environment is so stressful that if something is reliable there, it is worth a look at consumer applications. That's the main reason for factory backed racing, not brand recognition. In fact, the latter is merely a bonus in many cases.
 
Originally Posted By: Garak
Originally Posted By: nleksan
PAO and Esters are just better, and while many people would never notice anything aside from far fewer trips to the shop, when you push 400rwhp+ built motors making 150rwhp per liter or more,....

I only question this portion. The average person wouldn't notice anything different from running conventional (where specified), and certainly not more trips to the shop. For something with extreme performance, sure. If it's something that has questionable engineering or overly optimistic OCIs, sure, that applies as well.


THIS!

The last line is the golden one. A 'boutique' oil may be able to address a problem in a specific engine relative to oiling.

But for the overwhelming majority who do NOT play on a road course there may be no real advantage at all over a conventional, which are rapidly heading towards semi-syn anyway. I can tell you of many anecdotal stories about mega bucks engines my BIL has built that run plain old oil, some with over 30k invested!!!
 
Originally Posted By: SteveSRT8
The last line is the golden one. A 'boutique' oil may be able to address a problem in a specific engine relative to oiling.

I have nothing against a few boutique oils, and that includes RL, and I have a soft spot for RP. We do know that some engines are sludgers. Synthetics seem to help that issue, and no one has ever complained about how RP cleans things.

My old Audi had optimistic service intervals - 12,500 km on severe service with a turbo on conventional. I don't think so. I used a lot of 15w-40 in the summer with its preference for thicker oil. But, to avoid seasonal oil changes a 5w-40 or 0w-40 was the ticket. Both Delvac 1 ESP 5w-40 and RP 0w-40 were cheaper than M1 0w-40 (or GC), so I ran with them.

On the other hand, my old F-150 needs RP like it needs a hole in the block. It would be a waste of perfectly good oil.
 
Originally Posted By: nleksan
After all, what is this site, heck what is a scientific (or pseudoscientific) study if not a collection of experiences analyzed and from which a conclusion, or opinion, is drawn?

Only if it can be repeated by another tester.
wink.gif
 
I was saying, in the quoted section, that the only likely noticeable benefit for the average person is FEWER trips to the shop, as a result of the longer possibleOCI. I cconsider the no sludge aspect to be important as well, but not necessarily noticeable.
 
Originally Posted By: nleksan
I was saying, in the quoted section, that the only likely noticeable benefit for the average person is FEWER trips to the shop, as a result of the longer possibleOCI. I cconsider the no sludge aspect to be important as well, but not necessarily noticeable.

Not trying to beat you up, but how does the above coincide with what you say here:
Originally Posted By: nleksan
Extended OCI are economically WORSE based on the ever increasing chances of engine damage, especially in cars that aren't driven at length or driven hard, due to fuel and water dilution.

Extended OCIs are both a benefit and a detriment?
 
Originally Posted By: nleksan
I was saying, in the quoted section, that the only likely noticeable benefit for the average person is FEWER trips to the shop, as a result of the longer possibleOCI.

Okay, now that makes sense. Some of us here refuse to let shops change our oil, so we equate shop visits with repairs, not oil changes.
wink.gif
And yes, that's a tangible benefit.
 
Originally Posted By: DragRace


Excellent! The only thing I'll say is,


Those who know,are the ones who REALLY get it.
56.gif



Yup, no kidding. I doubt anyone could get me off Redline, has done wonders to my engine. I could write ten pages on it too, but in the end I just don't care enough to bother. I'm grateful for this website or I would have never even known about redline, and if I told you all the benefits you probably would think I'm lying, so I keep it all to myself. It is at least possible I could have gotten those results with another oil, i will admit that, but since redline was the first oil I've tried that ended my valve train noises when nothing else would, i am loyal too it.
 
Originally Posted By: sammy
Originally Posted By: DragRace


Excellent! The only thing I'll say is,


Those who know,are the ones who REALLY get it.
56.gif



Yup, no kidding. I doubt anyone could get me off Redline, has done wonders to my engine. I could write ten pages on it too, but in the end I just don't care enough to bother. I'm grateful for this website or I would have never even known about redline, and if I told you all the benefits you probably would think I'm lying, so I keep it all to myself. It is at least possible I could have gotten those results with another oil, i will admit that, but since redline was the first oil I've tried that ended my valve train noises when nothing else would, i am loyal too it.


Redline is my favorite brand of oil and if cost weren't an issue I'd use it exclusively.
With that added cost is of course the ability to keep an engine from welding itself together while tracking a car however does this extra cost translate to less maintenance later in the vehicles life?
What sends most cars today to the wrecker is rust,accident or it needs more work than the vehicle is worth. The engines seem to be running fine though.
Do I need the extra wear protection these big buck oils provide,no,nor do most of today's drivers.
Nowadays the engines are still running strong as the car is towed off.
 
CC268,

I'm no oil scientist but my main reason I use any synthetic motor oil is because I want to lubricate my engine better and try and get a little more MPG which synthetic oil provides for my pocket book.

In my past when I had my Honda Civic it did appear it stay cleaner longer than conventional dino. When I check the dip stick it showed no discoloration for an easy 2K. This observance might be different in other engines.

Using any synthetic I would never run any synthetic for 10K miles. I mainly use my OLM to tell me when it's proper time to swap the oil out. That's why I feel to get the best oil you can afford and run it until the meter tells you otherwise. For sure PEAK will take you to 6K miles with no issues but I wouldn't go past that. If you get the "extended" versions of other brands it's the stronger additive package that'll take you to 10K.

Durango
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom