Oil FIlter Test

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Sep 20, 2005
Messages
5
Location
Ohio
I liked the Air Filter test...will there be a companion Oil Filter test? I think we would learn just as much as with the air flters. I would like to see a spin on test and a high priced reusable test for particle size and use. Does anyone agree?
 
There is a great oil filter test with pore sizes and media flow, look at the top of this forum.
 
The folks on BITOG don't care too much how good a filter is, all they care about is that it is not a Fram and it does not fall apart. Look at how few get a particle count with their UOA's. Darn few!
 
I looked at the test...it did show that most of the spin-on type filters are similar. FLow rate varies as does filter level but not significantly. I would really like to see a comparision of filter effectiveness and flow rate for permanent stainless filters. I think that is the only way to really protect engine life and prolong oil use...most oil is thrown away too soon. An oil analysis would also be significant but this would require real engines during real conditions.
 
Watch out guys there they are again. Those words that got us all stirred up this week.

...."for permanent stainless filters."

Go back, it's a trap.

Profile for DG624
Member Status: Junior Member
Member Number: 9165
Registered: 09-21-2005
Posts: 3
Location: Ohio
Occupation: City Planner
 
Pete: I don't think its the same guy... the grammar and spelling are too good!

DG624: Sit tight and see how these whole stainless steel debates play out.
 
I have used an Oberg filter and it worked great...had a light that indicated when it needed to be cleaned. Filtered down to 28 microns and was extremely durable. I went 40-50,000 between complete oil changes with Synthoil and had 165,000 miles on the car.

Dirt and heat are the main problems when considering oil longevity. When the oil stops lubricating the engine suffers. If you keep the oil clean and reduce heat (by other methods) then the oil chnge interval should be longer. I really don't want to change my oil frequently if I can help it with 12 quarts to drain. Particles less than 40 microns are the big problem for engine wear and paper filters don't consistently filter below that level.

I have seen other filters but would like one that does not use a remote location (spin-on). I have looked at Vortex, System1, Canton/Mecca and Trasko. Vortex seemed to be the only one that would fit my application.
 
On another thread I have described a test I'm going to do with a PurePower filter. Over the next comple of months there will be some photos, uoa's and analysis by Terry on a washable ss ff filter.'

I don't think there is any other way, on my budget to figure out if these filters work. This test is not science, just practical application with actual lab tests and photos. There are too many members here shooting from the hip. We'll let Terry Dyson have a few words, here, too.
 
Jim, there is a magnetic filter disc that goes between a ff filter and the filter mount. With some testing it might be a good idea, if space permits and the gunk can be delt with and it does not plug up.

On another thread I have described a test I'm going to do with a PurePower filter. Over the next comple of months there will be some photos, uoa's and analysis by Terry on a washable ss ff filter.'

I don't think there is any other way, on my budget to figure out if these filters work. This test is not science, just practical application with actual lab tests and photos. There are too many members here shooting from the hip. We'll let Terry Dyson have a few words, here, too.
 
How about a compromise between the stainless permanent filters and the replacable spin on filters. How about a stainless steel screen that fits on the top of your favorite spin-on oil filter? The screen is to trap large chunks of carbon or metal to warn you of the condition of your engine.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom