oh Volvo!

Status
Not open for further replies.
agreed.

serpentine belt change on the 2005 s60 involves easing the tensioner and swapping the belt. You need to have just the right size of ratchet and extension to reach the tensioner, then it's easy. With the tool in hand it's 3 minutes. my mother's civic of the same year--- I could not figure out how to get both belts off in the hour I had to work with.

They do seem a little complicated, but also feature-rich. The PCV system is dense. I'd really like to know why they chose that design. The cooling system has 8 hoses- albeit, 2 are for an air/oil heat exchanger, not found on every other vehicle out there, and some may have 2 more to heat the PCV line. There's a bunch of electronic modules-- those scare me but knock on wood, we haven't had any problems yet. But there's quality too - big coolant manifold on the back of the engine - looks like stainless steel, where other makes could be found using plastic in similar applications.

They are just built with a different philosophy.

-m
 
Last edited:
Originally Posted By: meep
The cooling system has 8 hoses- albeit, 2 are for an air/oil heat exchanger, not found on every other vehicle out there, and some may have 2 more to heat the PCV line. There's a bunch of electronic modules-- those scare me but knock on wood, we haven't had any problems yet.


crazy2.gif
 
My wife's 2012 S60 I5 used oil when we bought it. It only had 20,000 kms on it. I switched to Castrol synthetic. Still used oil. Put some Wynn's tune up in it. Took it for a drive on the highway. Changed the oil. Doesn't use a drop anymore. I think the rings were just gummed up.
 
Originally Posted By: chrisri
Pity they aren't capable to match unibody shell strength of a inferior Volvo product. Anyone driving 5 cylinder turbo will confirm what a poor design that is compared with Toyota.

Trolling.gif
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Trolling.gif
 
Originally Posted By: chrisri
Originally Posted By: HTSS_TR
If Volvo can design/engineer an engine as good/reliable as Honda/Toyota then they didn't bought out by Chinese.


Yes indeed, and Toy/Honda are also nicer, more desirable vehicles. Pity they aren't capable to match unibody shell strength of a inferior Volvo product. Anyone driving 5 cylinder turbo will confirm what a poor design that is compared with Toyota.

Wonder why Toyota looked at BMWs for their diesels...


Wait...wait...you drive a Fiat Punto and you're knocking Volvo!??

The 5 cylinder turbo engine is powerful, reliable, and I've got over 200,000 miles on two of them. They use little to no oil. The P2 chassis is solid and reliable.

I've driven lawn tractors that are better than a Punto....

Let me know when your Punto gets totaled by a skateboard or baby stroller....
 
Last edited:
Originally Posted By: meep
The PCV system is dense. I'd really like to know why they chose that design.


The PVC system is a good idea, in that it doesn't suck oil into the engine like a normal PCV system - it just needs to be more accessible for maintenance, and not made out of plastic that gets hard and brittle with age. Plastic has no place in an automobile, but it appears Volvo has substancial shares in the plastics industry.
 
Wait...wait...you drive a Fiat Punto and you're knocking Volvo!??

The 5 cylinder turbo engine is powerful, reliable, and I've got over 200,000 miles on two of them. They use little to no oil. The P2 chassis is solid and reliable.

I've driven lawn tractors that are better than a Punto....

Let me know when your Punto gets totaled by a skateboard or baby stroller.... [/quote]

+1 I can't imagine my 6,900 mountain biking trip out west last summer in a Punto. I'd rather take my '68 Cub Cadet tractor.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom