The so called "evidence" are things I can understand how it was produced. Things made by humans, and I have figured out how.
Care to share?
The so called "evidence" are things I can understand how it was produced. Things made by humans, and I have figured out how.
IMO the big question is the type of power source used to move the UAP's around. Remember the UAP's (Arial video and eyewitness accounts) did not emit exhaust gases nor have control surfaces. Solve that riddle and you have your answer.What's the more likely scenario: gov't/military testing of new tech, or aliens visiting us from another galaxy. Not all UAP's have to be manned either.
Which is exactly what I have said.You support being open minded, but only only if that open mind reaches the same conclusion that you have. A truly open mind is open to the possibility that they exist, as well as the possibility that they do not.
Please quote what I have said that disagrees with this statement.The UAP phenomena may have simple, terrestrial, explanation. You must be open-minded enough to consider that and accept it if it was proven be true.
Please quote a YouTube video I have linked here.IIf a person on the board was as equally qualified as the guest in your YouTube video to discuss and comment on the topic, would you be open minded enough to listen to them?
It proves we’re run by idiots that are nothing more than a drain to society. It doesn’t prove anything else.Just remember. The government has generated tens of millions of documents and spent hundreds of millions possibly billions of dollars on "something that doesn't exist"......
Yep, spiritual transcendents with apparitional essences of power. Some scholars speculate there may be 10s of thousands of these fallen creatures. I can say many on earth will soon encounter them, plus their 'Giant' leaders, once a great snatch occurs.Spiritual world is quite vast. Transcedent. I'll stop there as hopefully I've not gone beyond the rules here.
Try to use meBut no seriousness I'd like to know do they use a synthetic blend in the ships? Or pure synthetic. Do they use Esther?
IMO the big question is the type of power source used to move the UAP's around. Remember the UAP's (Arial video and eyewitness accounts) did not emit exhaust gases nor have control surfaces. Solve that riddle and you have your answer.
Could, should, maybe. Again it defies physics and fluid dynamics. Remember the tic tac is a smooth object about the size of a school bus. It needs to generate lift using some form of energy. How does it do that without control surfaces? How does it generate the amount of energy to move faster than a fighter jet in multiple directions while having a worse drag coefficient?"Did not emit" is not the same as "did not detect emissions".
Today's stealth could have alien-like attributes just a number of decades ago as well, just as an example.
When it comes to stuff like aliens, the default position for any reasonable person should be: "we may not yet understand what that UAP was, but it's 99.999999% probable to be man made or miss sighted etc". Because that's what everything we know about space, time, physics, would suggest it to be. Until there is firm evidence that they exist here, there is no reason to suggest they do just because we don't yet have all the facts of what was "seen".
The principle you’re using here is Occam’s Razor, which states that the simplest answer to the unexplained is usually the best one.When it comes to stuff like aliens, the default position for any reasonable person should be: "we may not yet understand what that UAP was, but it's 99.999999% probable to be man made or miss sighted etc". Because that's what everything we know about space, time, physics, would suggest it to be.
Occam’s Razor suggests this, but it does not falsify any other explanation. Carl Sagan said, “extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.” This certainly applies here. Just bear in mind, extraordinary evidence requires extraordinary change.Until there is firm evidence that they exist here, there is no reason to suggest they do just because we don't yet have all the facts of what was "seen".
Problem with that statement is they've been doing it for at least 70 years. From back when the government seemed to be some what effective.It proves we’re run by idiots that are nothing more than a drain to society. It doesn’t prove anything else.
The original post embedded that video and you touted the credentials of the guest. I apologize - I was conflating your posts with the OP - but you did say that the guest in the linked video was credentialed.Which is exactly what I have said.
Please quote what I have said that disagrees with this statement.
Please quote a YouTube video I have linked here.
You are extrapolating a lot here, assuming because I am conflicting slightly with others’ opinions that my opinion must be diametrically opposed to theirs, and therefore I am saying aliens are real, these are aliens, etc. Never have I said this.
My point has been consistent here: There is evidence of something. It does not seem likely that this is fake or a ruse, aka nothing. Anyone outside the circle of those with exposure to these phenomena who dismisses it outright or who purports to know the cause are guided by bias.
If I were to speculate wildly about seemingly unlikely causes, frankly the ultraterrestrial or time travel angles seem equally or even somewhat more plausible. But these are speculations - I truly do not know, but it certainly merits attention.
Edit: This could also be contemporary human technology. If that is the case it would mean that someone probably cracked the code on a unified theory of gravity. The implications of that for humanity would be incredible. No matter what the explanation is, it still seems like a pretty big deal.
Gotcha. I can see how it might be interpreted that I said the guy in the video was credentialed, but my intention was only to point to Dr. Gallaudet.The original post embedded that video and you touted the credentials of the guest. I apologize - I was conflating your posts with the OP - but you did say that the guest in the linked video was credentialed.
Fair enough. I’m curious what you think of Dr. G.I’ve read those credentials on LinkedIn - Colonel Nell. Electrical engineering major (not astrophysics). Retired Army Colonel. O-6 command. War college. No flight experience. No experience with the systems that tracked the recent UAP.
But a profile full of self promotion. Senior executive, manager, defense consultant, etc. He mentioned “Ivy League” several times.
Ugh. Please.
I’m just not that impressed.
Or we may have been put here by them a couple thousand years agoMy take is that if an intelligent species figured out much faster than light travel, we probably aren't all that interesting, or have anything they need. And they wouldn't have to make themselves known to study us in detail.
What are they going to learn from us? We, as a global species, hardly display any more intelligent behaviour than yeast in a wine bottle, consuming and competing for resources, until we poison our environment....
It's a shame. Most won't go down the rabbit hole. They start with the assumption that physics prevents any ET from getting here. Fair point. They'll knock everyone that has had an experience that to them sounds crazy. Even people that are mentally stable with training on observables. Nah can't happen. You're nuts. It's just us....those types.The close-mindedness, fixed-mindset mentality, stigma, and ignorance of evidence is on full display here. Hilarious and sad at the same time.
There is something going on. It is not yet clear what it is, but you’re not paying enough attention if you think it is all a ruse, and you’re displaying hubris if you purport to know definitively one way or the other.