Newton explained it nearly 350 years ago. Einstein gave us a new way to look at it, but it’s pretty well understood at this point.Yes, momentum and gravity. Except no one can explain gravity yet![]()
Newton explained it nearly 350 years ago. Einstein gave us a new way to look at it, but it’s pretty well understood at this point.Yes, momentum and gravity. Except no one can explain gravity yet![]()
I would guess certainly true for some , probably many.Looks like another attempt to round up some investor money.
These things pop up over the years almost like clockwork, then disappear only to re-emerge few years down the line.
Understood what it does - sure. How it actually works - no one knows. Relativity does not line up with actual quantum mechanics regarding gravity. So which is wrong?Newton explained it nearly 350 years ago. Einstein gave us a new way to look at it, but it’s pretty well understood at this point.
“Nano materials” has a familiar ring to it…almost like “crystal lattice pressure” from “cold fusion”.Looks like another attempt to round up some investor money.
These things pop up over the years almost like clockwork, then disappear only to re-emerge few years down the line.
"Does not line up" is a small use case. It lines up just fine for everything we need it to do for things like space flight, and all of our observations support the current understanding, including relativistic phenomena like gravitational lensing.Understood what it does - sure. How it actually works - no one knows. Relativity does not line up with actual quantum mechanics regarding gravity. So which is wrong?
Relative to this thread that is like saying my wife knows how to operate a car - but has no clue how to open the hood, and has only put gas in it once in 26 years of being married (and boy did I hear about it)."Does not line up" is a small use case. It lines up just fine for everything we need it to do for things like space flight, and all of our observations support the current understanding, including relativistic phenomena like gravitational lensing.
But in the case of gravity and quantum mechanics near black holes, singularities, there are some issues to be resolved.
As far as "how" - that is philosophy or meta-physics - "how" does electricity "know" where to flow? "How" do electrons "know" where they are supposed to exist in quantum mechanical states?
The "how" is unimportant - it's enough to know "what" it does.
That’s not the analogy I would use.Relative to this thread that is like saying my wife knows how to operate a car - but has no clue how to open the hood, and has only put gas in it once in 26 years of being married (and boy did I hear about it).
I am paraphrasing, so give me some rope.That’s not the analogy I would use.
It is more like saying that your wife knows every component, how the pistons are shaped, what alloy they used, how the rings are made, how the oil functions, and she’s read the entire owners manual, but she’s not sure why they chose the design elements they did for the styling, or why it’s a 3.0 liter instead of a 2.2
https://www.caltech.edu/about/news/do-electrons-spinAtoms? I have no idea what you mean by planets that “spin” around atoms, unless you mean electrons, which aren’t exactly spinning. IF you have disproved quantum mechanics - I am sure the scientific world would be fascinated by your findings.