NISSAN Versa : anyone have the
- Thread starter odie
- Start date
- Status
I have driven in one with a friend of mine that owns it and it has the CVT, I don't know the engine size but it drove great.
Why don't you look at something other than the bottom of the barrel cars on the market?
Had one as a rental when down for a briefing in MD, Much more spacious and comfortable than the Yaris, the nissan sporting an intelligent layout, nice interior materials. Drove and handled VERY competently with the exception of a noisy weak engine. Underhood had the typical sloppy Nissan wiring/routing and finish.
Last edited:
Originally Posted By: The Critic
Why don't you look at something other than the bottom of the barrel cars on the market?
A well designed car is just that no matter the product placement. Most entry level vehicles are low cost to own and are quite satisfying these days. EX; You wouldnt get me anywhere near the ridiculous honda Civic design; compared to previous iteration: Heavier, larger, same interior volume, bizarro instrument pod, overly sloped windscreen, Pricey - E gad!
Why don't you look at something other than the bottom of the barrel cars on the market?
A well designed car is just that no matter the product placement. Most entry level vehicles are low cost to own and are quite satisfying these days. EX; You wouldnt get me anywhere near the ridiculous honda Civic design; compared to previous iteration: Heavier, larger, same interior volume, bizarro instrument pod, overly sloped windscreen, Pricey - E gad!
Last edited:
Originally Posted By: The Critic
Why don't you look at something other than the bottom of the barrel cars on the market?
This seems to be your contribution when anyone looks @ an entry vehicle. People's requirements vary, peoples preferences vary, peoples BUDGETS vary. I'm sure a fit @ 5K more is what you might suggest.... 8)
I will defend the choice of a low cost purchase, low cost to run vehicle; it is appropriate for many people.
Why don't you look at something other than the bottom of the barrel cars on the market?
This seems to be your contribution when anyone looks @ an entry vehicle. People's requirements vary, peoples preferences vary, peoples BUDGETS vary. I'm sure a fit @ 5K more is what you might suggest.... 8)
I will defend the choice of a low cost purchase, low cost to run vehicle; it is appropriate for many people.
Last edited:
Take a look at a Hyundai Accent also, they are similarly priced.. I think that Hyundai is building better cars now anyways.
If the engine wasnt so weak the Kia Rio 5 is the best handling, nicely finished affordable entry on the market. Handles much better and more precisely than the std bearer old BMW 318ti. Hard to find on the dealer lot though ... IIRC it has the same engine as the Accent. But I got the Yaris for 1000 less $$ than a Kia or Hyundai and it has a MUCH better engine IMO; I Just Wish it had the Rio 5 handling though ...
Last edited:
Originally Posted By: The Critic
Why don't you look at something other than the bottom of the barrel cars on the market?
There's a comment that was certainly helpful for the original poster. I've never considered Nissan "bottom of the barrel".
But since you own one I'll default to your judgement.
Quote:
1.6 ltr. or 1.8 ltr. VERSA ? If so , what tranny and how's the fuel economy and dependability been ? Thanks .
I drove a rental a few weeks ago when I was in Omaha. It didn't have the CVT and I think it had the 1.8 (not positive).
It did exactly what I expected of an economy car. Fuel mileage was decent (mid to upper 30’s) and had enough power to do anything I wanted. It wasn’t a sports car by any means, but it seemed to be a solid small car.
Why don't you look at something other than the bottom of the barrel cars on the market?
There's a comment that was certainly helpful for the original poster. I've never considered Nissan "bottom of the barrel".
But since you own one I'll default to your judgement.
Quote:
1.6 ltr. or 1.8 ltr. VERSA ? If so , what tranny and how's the fuel economy and dependability been ? Thanks .
I drove a rental a few weeks ago when I was in Omaha. It didn't have the CVT and I think it had the 1.8 (not positive).
It did exactly what I expected of an economy car. Fuel mileage was decent (mid to upper 30’s) and had enough power to do anything I wanted. It wasn’t a sports car by any means, but it seemed to be a solid small car.
Originally Posted By: The Critic
Why don't you look at something other than the bottom of the barrel cars on the market?
for the lower payment and fuel economy that saves money that can be used towards the lower car payment . If we were millionaires we'd still buy a lower end vehicle(s) .
Why don't you look at something other than the bottom of the barrel cars on the market?
for the lower payment and fuel economy that saves money that can be used towards the lower car payment . If we were millionaires we'd still buy a lower end vehicle(s) .
I'm the voice of dissent here. My stepson has a hatchback SL. Cheap, flimsy, noisy. Lots of rear seat room. The engine is anemic, and gets about 25 tops on the highway. Needs brakes at 56k. On it's second set of tires, the Conti's were bald at 48k. A constant TPS warning light since the first flat at 36k. The dealer wanted 150 to reset it and flash the prom with an update. I didn't expect much from a rebadged Renault, and I wasn't disappointed. I have another friend with a Fit, and my Sis has a Scion. Both are light years ahead of the Nissan in fit, finish, and apparent quality.
My bridgestones on my toyota were bald at 17K. Garbage 180 wear rating on OEMS
56k for brakes is good service life.
Last edited:
Originally Posted By: ARCOgraphite
Originally Posted By: The Critic
Why don't you look at something other than the bottom of the barrel cars on the market?
A well designed car is just that no matter the product placement. Most entry level vehicles are low cost to own and are quite satisfying these days. EX; You wouldnt get me anywhere near the ridiculous honda Civic design; compared to previous iteration: Heavier, larger, same interior volume, bizarro instrument pod, overly sloped windscreen, Pricey - E gad!
Really? I like the current Civic design beter than any to date. Goes to show the same model can be loved or hated by anyone...
Originally Posted By: The Critic
Why don't you look at something other than the bottom of the barrel cars on the market?
A well designed car is just that no matter the product placement. Most entry level vehicles are low cost to own and are quite satisfying these days. EX; You wouldnt get me anywhere near the ridiculous honda Civic design; compared to previous iteration: Heavier, larger, same interior volume, bizarro instrument pod, overly sloped windscreen, Pricey - E gad!
Really? I like the current Civic design beter than any to date. Goes to show the same model can be loved or hated by anyone...
Originally Posted By: simple_gifts
Originally Posted By: The Critic
Why don't you look at something other than the bottom of the barrel cars on the market?
This seems to be your contribution when anyone looks @ an entry vehicle. People's requirements vary, peoples preferences vary, peoples BUDGETS vary. I'm sure a fit @ 5K more is what you might suggest.... 8)
I will defend the choice of a low cost purchase, low cost to run vehicle; it is appropriate for many people.
Sorry, I should have stated my response in a less controversial manner.
For $15k (or less), none of the new cars in that price range are worthy of their cost IMO.
I understand the OP may be concerned about low cost of ownership and low initial cost, but he must also consider that entry level cars in this price range are built with lower attention to detail and may not be desirable to own as they age. From my experience, entry-level subcompacts do not hold up well as they age; for a longer lasting car, you are better off with a mid-sized sedan.
In case some of you have not read JHZR2's posts lately, some of these entry-level cars are not truly economical, as they do not deliver significantly better fuel economy than four-cylinder midsized sedans. Their tires are sometimes just as expensive as well, which takes away much of the lower cost of ownership argument.
IMO, the OP is much better off with a gently used, late model 06-07 Accord I4 than a new Versa. The Accord will get just as good fuel economy, be rock-solid reliable and is likely to last longer. And no simple_gifts, I would not recommend a Fit-- my opinion of the Fit has been well-documented on this forum.
Originally Posted By: The Critic
Why don't you look at something other than the bottom of the barrel cars on the market?
This seems to be your contribution when anyone looks @ an entry vehicle. People's requirements vary, peoples preferences vary, peoples BUDGETS vary. I'm sure a fit @ 5K more is what you might suggest.... 8)
I will defend the choice of a low cost purchase, low cost to run vehicle; it is appropriate for many people.
Sorry, I should have stated my response in a less controversial manner.
For $15k (or less), none of the new cars in that price range are worthy of their cost IMO.
I understand the OP may be concerned about low cost of ownership and low initial cost, but he must also consider that entry level cars in this price range are built with lower attention to detail and may not be desirable to own as they age. From my experience, entry-level subcompacts do not hold up well as they age; for a longer lasting car, you are better off with a mid-sized sedan.
In case some of you have not read JHZR2's posts lately, some of these entry-level cars are not truly economical, as they do not deliver significantly better fuel economy than four-cylinder midsized sedans. Their tires are sometimes just as expensive as well, which takes away much of the lower cost of ownership argument.
IMO, the OP is much better off with a gently used, late model 06-07 Accord I4 than a new Versa. The Accord will get just as good fuel economy, be rock-solid reliable and is likely to last longer. And no simple_gifts, I would not recommend a Fit-- my opinion of the Fit has been well-documented on this forum.
Getting back to some of the original questions I would recommend the 1.8L engine. I own a Civic with the 1.6L, newer Civics have gone to the 1.8L with basically the same mpg. There are times when I wish I had a little more pep, especially with the A/C running and several passengers.
Clark
Clark
Originally Posted By: The Critic
Why don't you look at something other than the bottom of the barrel cars on the market?
I have to agree unless this car is well used and meets a budget. A car like a Camry, Altima, Accord, or Mabilbu is far superior and you only lose maybe a 1-2MPG around town. The highway fuel economy is usually on par.
I would rather own a slightly older midsize car than a small car. It trumps it in every way.
Why don't you look at something other than the bottom of the barrel cars on the market?
I have to agree unless this car is well used and meets a budget. A car like a Camry, Altima, Accord, or Mabilbu is far superior and you only lose maybe a 1-2MPG around town. The highway fuel economy is usually on par.
I would rather own a slightly older midsize car than a small car. It trumps it in every way.
Originally Posted By: rjundi
Originally Posted By: The Critic
Why don't you look at something other than the bottom of the barrel cars on the market?
I have to agree unless this car is well used and meets a budget. A car like a Camry, Altima, Accord, or Mabilbu is far superior and you only lose maybe a 1-2MPG around town. The highway fuel economy is usually on par.
I would rather own a slightly older midsize car than a small car. It trumps it in every way.
Those are some really boring, spiritless cars. I had a high end 2010 camry loaner recenlty and couldnt wait to get OUT of the drivers seat. The Dodge Sebring rental ( w/ 4cyl world engine) I had in FL was way superior in overall driving dynamics. And the 08 Mercury LS 4.6 I rented trumped even the Buick LeSabre.
Originally Posted By: The Critic
Why don't you look at something other than the bottom of the barrel cars on the market?
I have to agree unless this car is well used and meets a budget. A car like a Camry, Altima, Accord, or Mabilbu is far superior and you only lose maybe a 1-2MPG around town. The highway fuel economy is usually on par.
I would rather own a slightly older midsize car than a small car. It trumps it in every way.
Those are some really boring, spiritless cars. I had a high end 2010 camry loaner recenlty and couldnt wait to get OUT of the drivers seat. The Dodge Sebring rental ( w/ 4cyl world engine) I had in FL was way superior in overall driving dynamics. And the 08 Mercury LS 4.6 I rented trumped even the Buick LeSabre.
- Status
Similar threads
