"The Road Cycle Durability test, for example, is designed to replicate real-world customer driving and vehicle maintenance patterns. For this test, engines with EcoBoost technology were subjected to 1,000 cold starts, followed by sustained operation at peak torque and peak power. During the course of the test, engine coolant temperatures ranged from 12 degrees Celsius (about 53 degrees Fahrenheit) to 95 degrees Celsius (203 degrees Fahrenheit)."...
This is far from "real-world" cold starts in a canadian way. I wish they had performed this test starting from temperatures as low as -25C or lower and then measure wear, etc.
And this:
"With its twin turbochargers, the EcoBoost V-6 swallows about 25 percent more air than its normally aspirated cousin, the 3.5-liter Duratec V-6."...
If theory is correct, if you swallow 25% more air, don't you need 25% more fuel to go with it?
Fuel economy numbers are bound to look good in labs at low revs but in real life, I doubt they'll be much better than a comparatively larger (V8) NA engine.