These filters may be fine but if this was Fram doing such,how many would be praising them for it?
Considering this new construction,I see very little difference between this new design and Frams design.
Before anyone says that the 'new' design and the Fram design are completely different.
Are they really?
Has anyone cut open one of the filters made with nylon AFTER use?
Gary,I have seen plastic/resin/nylon parts that have been hot and then cooled down as a filters internals would,they can and DO give way to heat.
When they do,they can crack and break.
Gary,I have personally seen this,it does happen.
The pieces range from small to rather large.
Will this happen to the filters with the new design?
I don't know but it IS possible.
Considering such,I see very little reason not to use Fram.
I would think it would be as easy if not easier to bond paper to cardboard than paper to nylon.
It would seem that you would have just as good of a seal.
I don't use Fram and have not for quite some time,however,I used to use them quite often and the car I used them on had 169,000+ on it when I stopped driving it.As far as I know,it still runs.
It had never had any engine work done on it.
Maybe we have been making too much of a deal out of then Frams construction.
Considering that Champion used metal endcaps and if I am not mistaken,said it was superior to cardboard,they are using the plastic to cover themselves for making a CHEAPER filter and for making the comments against cardboard.
Now,some will say that this new design flows better.If we go back not long ago,Bob tested a Fram and it showed very little resistance to flow.
As I said,I see very little difference between Fram and the new design from Champion.