New AMSOIL Signature Series formulation rolling out

I will say the Amsoil ATV oil was very much a surprise for me. I just threw it in my CFMOTO UFORCE U10 XL PRO and that engine smoothed out much better than what was in there before. Granted the original oil was break-in oil but I've become a real fan of Amsoil products. I'm not a fanboy of everything in the world but their ATV has like 4.6% NOAK or something silly and their gear oil is fantastic. I get it, people don't like their advertising, but I really do like their products. Doesn't mean I'll use it in my Grenadier or outboards though. Some of their products are complete wastes. I really like their HDEO oil, too. About to tow 14,000lbs from Texas to Moab and back on a 2008 Duramax.
 
@tired But we do know the 5W-30 is shipping as the new formula in the gallon jugs. Obviously the 5W-30 is probably more popular than the 0W-30.
Correct it is. But still shipping old in quarts. Agree that 5W-30 is the most popular, so I’d say fair bet that 0W-30 is the old formula. I’d hold out as long as you can if you want the new.
 
On the Amsoil app it shows nothing but the old label for 0W-30, whereas the 5W-30 shows the new label and has a note that the new formula is being shipped as the old one is used up. So my guess is the 0W-30 is not shipping with the new formula yet.
I noticed that the 0W-30 product page still has the older Signature Series product data sheet and is also missing the disclaimer about rolling out the newer formulation, unlike 5W-30 or 0W-20.

5W-30:
IMG_0563.webp


0W-20:
IMG_0562.webp


0W-30 (no disclaimer box on rolling out the newer formulation):
IMG_0564.webp
 
Hopefully I didn't miss someone already posting this, but it's AMSOIL's explanation blog post for the new formula.
https://blog.amsoil.com/new-formula-same-promise-maximum-engine-life-and-performance/
AA: It is better in every way. Specifically, next-generation Signature Series provides 12.5% better results in Cold Cranking Simulator testing. In the Thermo-Oxidation Engine Oil Simulation Test, the TEOST, it performed three times better than the old formula. In Sequence IIIH, we saw a 16% improvement in weighted piston deposits versus the old formula, and that’s a big deal. With the last formulation, we ran a double-length Sequence IIIH on the last version of Signature Series and the results were outstanding. Well, we did it again and the results are even better.
 
Back
Top Bottom