My Review of SAE Articles from 2006 and 2007

Status
Not open for further replies.
i agree john and thank you aehaas..i just don't understand something if redline 10w30 is rated at 10.7 cst@ 212 f isn't that thin already @ 212 degrees f?...a 5w20 is about 9.2 cst @ 212f...not much difference
 
Quote:


My aim is to educate people to use the correct oil for Their Application. I want to show that the use of thinner oils when used properly can actually minimize wear especially for city or U.S. type highway driving. We should not be falsely afraid of thinner oils - a common thinking that is hard to change.

Blanket statements as “you need a more robust oil as a 20W-50 XYZ” must be clearly defined as to why this may be true. And in most cases it is incorrectly advised. Thinner oils do allow for more MPG out of a given engine and allow for greater BHP often without greater wear. And I wish to get people out of the thinking that there is a big difference in an oil when the 100 degree C viscosity is 10 verses 11. The additive package is more important than the viscosity yet the viscosity is (almost) all anybody ever discusses.

I try to show that there are not many differences between current mineral based and synthetic oils but that certain criteria may sway you to use one over another.

And the list goes on.

aehaas


This is fact IMO because of the neg. temps I have experienced in
driving.gif
the past 22 yrs. Thinner oil is better.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom