Multi-vehicle vs Vehicle Specific ATF's

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Apr 7, 2005
Messages
1,904
Location
Bay Area, CA
Redline makes a bunch of different ATF fluids, specifically for different makes of vehicles. Why does Amsoil insist on having a Universal fluid? The different mfg's must have different requirements, like the amount of friction modifiers, and of course viscosity. I would think Amsoil would sell more ATF fluid if they had more "application specific" fluids.

Of course, Pennzoil has followed Amsoils lead and come out with a Multivehicle ATF. OTOH Mobil makes a bunch of different ATF's. (although some are hard to find)

Just ranting.
stirthepot.gif
deadhorse.gif


Oh, and I am not trying to dis Amsoils ATF. I am sure it is a great fluid. It is just that calling something "Universal" just leaves me thinking there were too many compromises made.
 
The fact that many people report excellent results using these multivehicle fluids (M1, Amsoil, Maxlife etc.) in a wide variety of makes and models leads me to think that there's not as much difference between these fluids as we may think. Certainly, there's no harm in using a specific formula but it seems unnecessary (except for Honda/Acura.) The most important thing is to change the fluid, and filter if required, whether with a multivehicle or OEM fluid at a reasonable interval.
 
Quote:


except for Honda/Acura



Amsoil spec's Z-1.

I use Amsoil ATF in an ATF+4 tranny and so far so good. I think if there were real problems with these fluids they would be showing up all over the net on nearly every car forum since they can be used in so many makes. I've only seen one person on this board complain about Amsoil's shifting...that's it.
 
This topic is brought up every month.

I don't see compromises. Multivehicle fluids meet and usually exceed the best specs of all the requirements. How is that a compromise?

Most application specs are pretty lame. Combine them to make a superior spec.
 
Quote:



I don't see compromises. Multivehicle fluids meet and usually exceed the best specs of all the requirements. How is that a compromise?





Two compromises for sure. 1. amount of friction modifier. 2. Viscosity.

Why does lubegaurd have different products if there is no need for compromises?

Pablo, thanks for the info. It seems like Amsoil has a similar range of ATF as Redline. I should have researched more first.
 
I don't see any compromises. I see 'target' markets.

Lubegard red can be used with any ATF. Its an easy way to add the LXE ester to any automatic.
Black/Green are their HFM additives. I've heard that one might include pour point depressants to meet a certain cold spec that.
Platinum adds an AW/EP additive along with the HFM additive.

Viscosity, the only compromise is with the newer thin MPG fluids(ZF, VI, WS, SP). Last time I checked, there weren't any lubegard products converting a thick ATF to a thin ATF. And, the 1 point CST range at 212F(not even normal operating temp) is nothing to argue over. Motor oils have 3.2cst or more for each label spec.

Concerning friction modification, most fluids spec the life for the HFM component and the friction level. Since each spec has a range, a multivehicle ATF will usually fall into the average of all the ranges.

Concerning seal and material compatibility, I prefer a fluid that meets multi-specs.

Concerning cold weather pumpability, the synthetics have been 20years ahead of the automakers requirements.

<> are still very common in fluid specs. So, I don't see any compromises.
 
Quote:


Actually Amsoil makes 4+ types of ATF.

ATF - Universal (but Pablo doesn't like in MT's)
ART - Supershift (a good choice for MT's that really require AT)
ATD - Torque Drive (Dex III also good in MT's)
CTX - Powershift series (for trucks)

Click on the ATF's here




Not to steal this thread, but is there an ATF that is specifically designed for MTs that spec an ATF to be used? i.e. a fluid with ATF-type specs, but with an additive package that is less tuned to the chemistry of clutch packs and AT comnponents, and more tuned to the conditions inside of a MT?

Thanks,

JMH
 
FWIW, I was told the my BMW ZF transmission would blow if I used anything but European Shell LA2634 fluid. This fluid is not available in the USA and is very very pricey if you can find someone to ship it to the USA. I was also told that BMW discovered that the fluid is not "lifetime" as was put in my 1994 owners manual but that I could discuss which fluid to use in my new tranny once the original the tranny failed.

After some research I have had great luck with Redline D4, Pennzoil Multi-Vehicle, QS Multi-Vehicle and yes Amsoil Universal.

She is still going strong.

My 2 cents.
 
Quote:


Why does lubeguard have different products if there is no need for compromises?



Lubegard has the RED, GREEN, BLACK, and PLATINUM products. The RED bottle is added to the correct ATF, the green bottle is added to convert Dexron III into Mercon V, the BLACK bottle is used to convert Dexron III into a variety of HFM type fluids, but NOT Mercon-V, and the PLATINUM does everything the RED, GREEN, and BLACK bottles do.

I used SuperTech Dexron IIIH and Lubegard BLACK in a 2001 Acura CL Type-S last week. 6 ounces was added to the final drain and refill (three total). The formerly neck jerking shift has been transformed into a smooth, firm engagement and the slip/flare is no worse than before.
 
Oh, and Undummy. You did make a very clear and thorough argument as to why Multivehicle fluids work. Thanks.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom