- Joined
- Feb 20, 2025
- Messages
- 12
Greetings, I've seen about two threads here talking about whether or not you should use Amsoil's Multi-Vehicle ATF in applications that call for ATF+4. I plan to get a friend a transmission fluid drain and fill this weekend, and want to use Amsoil's Multi-Vehicle ATF as it claims compatibility with ATF+4. So far I've used Amsoil ATF and CVT in applications that call for Toyota WS and various versions of CVTs with no issues, in fact, the results just seem better than the use of OEM fluid, which typically isn't even synthetic compared to Amsoil. The most debate I've seen online seems to revolve around ATF+4 applications, and I guess the question is why? Typically in these threads I'll see people claiming it's just better to be safe than sorry, as the products aren't certified etc, but not certified doesn't necessarily mean inferior, as Amsoil seems to care more about creating quality products vs paying for certifications. Also, the Magnuson Moss Warranty Act should theoretically protect you while using Amsoil if you're still under warranty, is this not correct? When it comes to actual use cases, the only posts I see are how Amsoil's Multi-Vehicle ATF has only improved performance in Chrysler/Dodge applications, while the other side who say to not use it are typically just fear mongering without actually having used the product themselves. I guess I don't understand the hate on a product that just seems to improve performance. While it's all anecdotal, I've only seen positive anecdotal testimonies when it comes to using Amsoil's Multi-Vehicle ATF in applications that call for ATF+4. I'm open to hearing negative anecdotal experience rather than fear mongering from those who haven't actually used the product.