API appears to be trying to establish a licensing program for motor oil installers, distrubutors and marketers.
See ths link:
http://www.motoroilmatters.org/Industry-Members?gclid=CI2tiNCekroCFQua4AoddCYAww
How many unwary consumers have been stung by the installation or purchase of unsuitable motor oil?
Could this be API's repsonse to PQIA's outting of a number of unsuitable products offered on store shelves that claim on their labels some vague reference to an API licensed standard?
The home page of this site even has a "Report Abuse" tab, to allow users to report the sale or installation of unsuitable motor oil products.
I hope that API is serious about going after those who sell unlicensed and unsuitable products with references to any API standard on their labels.
I found this site linked from an ad on pprune while I was surfing through a long thread on the VC-10, a plane kind of like a supersized BAC 111 that had the capacity of a Boeing 707 and four RR Conways mounted on the aft fuselage. And you all thought that the 707 and DC-8 had no British competitor.
See ths link:
http://www.motoroilmatters.org/Industry-Members?gclid=CI2tiNCekroCFQua4AoddCYAww
How many unwary consumers have been stung by the installation or purchase of unsuitable motor oil?
Could this be API's repsonse to PQIA's outting of a number of unsuitable products offered on store shelves that claim on their labels some vague reference to an API licensed standard?
The home page of this site even has a "Report Abuse" tab, to allow users to report the sale or installation of unsuitable motor oil products.
I hope that API is serious about going after those who sell unlicensed and unsuitable products with references to any API standard on their labels.
I found this site linked from an ad on pprune while I was surfing through a long thread on the VC-10, a plane kind of like a supersized BAC 111 that had the capacity of a Boeing 707 and four RR Conways mounted on the aft fuselage. And you all thought that the 707 and DC-8 had no British competitor.