Is there a relationship between the motor oil life length and the RPM at which the engine usually runs?
This question is motivated by my observation that a lot of cars with older 4-speed automatic transmissions end up cruising on the highway at say about 2,500 RPM or above (this is at 60mph speeds). On the other hand, cars with more modern 6-speed transmissions keep their engine RPM below 2,000 revs at similar speeds.
Could this relationship explain why some car manufacturers have extended the oil change interval recommendations? E.g. Ford's recommendation for most of its cars before 2007 was 5000 miles or 3000 miles under severe duty. The 2008 scheduled maintenance manual extends this to 7500/5000 miles (and no longer than 200 hours under severe duty) without making an explicit requirement to the type of motor oil to use, other than it having a formal approval, such as WSS-M2C946-A (all? conventional oils have it).
This question is motivated by my observation that a lot of cars with older 4-speed automatic transmissions end up cruising on the highway at say about 2,500 RPM or above (this is at 60mph speeds). On the other hand, cars with more modern 6-speed transmissions keep their engine RPM below 2,000 revs at similar speeds.
Could this relationship explain why some car manufacturers have extended the oil change interval recommendations? E.g. Ford's recommendation for most of its cars before 2007 was 5000 miles or 3000 miles under severe duty. The 2008 scheduled maintenance manual extends this to 7500/5000 miles (and no longer than 200 hours under severe duty) without making an explicit requirement to the type of motor oil to use, other than it having a formal approval, such as WSS-M2C946-A (all? conventional oils have it).
Last edited: