Mopar warranty issues w/ 0w-40 non FCA MS-12633 certification

Yeah. It is still an assumption. My thought process was that an arbitrator wouldn't have any more reason to believe the dealership over me. If my receipts don't prove I changed my oil, not sure their's do either. Especially with the ubiquitous stories about botched oil changes at dealerships and quick-change places.

Hopefully I'll never find out if my receipts and photos and notes are good enough.
Pics of engine internals will please the arbitrators over all else.

Only the scummiest of scumbag dealers would try to blame the oil with spotless internals. Arbitrators won’t fall for it.
 
Yeah. It is still an assumption. My thought process was that an arbitrator wouldn't have any more reason to believe the dealership over me. If my receipts don't prove I changed my oil, not sure their's do either. Especially with the ubiquitous stories about botched oil changes at dealerships and quick-change places.

Hopefully I'll never find out if my receipts and photos and notes are good enough.
Not a lawyer but I know in law, there is the foundation of the term "Reasonableness" that basically what is presented and brought forth is accurate in the totality of circumstance is presumed to be true unless proven otherwise.

It goes back to my analogy of the Jury Summons. One could ignore it and claimed they did not get it but if brought before a judge, that judge is going to get into you on your supposed lost mail and asked if you have reported past instances of lost mail to USPS and so forth because it is "reasonable" to assume the accuracy of mail delivery that you got it.

Any arbitrator should see through any of this nonsense of "How do I know" if receipts are brought, are accurate and shows a timeline that supports within the time window required.
 
Back
Top Bottom