Mopar TSB, found when surfing.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
May 6, 2008
Messages
601
Location
sweden
This is from an old Mopar TSB.


What does this TSB mean?
If you use one of the filters in this list, you will not have to worry about warranty coverage of an oil related engine failure. If you choose to use another filter that is not on the list, DC will (justifiably) make you pay for repairs if a piston cooling nozzle becomes clogged by a piece of filter material. Some filters have disintegrated resulting in severe engine damage. When this happens, you must seek compensation from the manufacturer of the filter (numerous reports of Fram failures have surfaced recently, and Wix filters damaged some 1st Gen engines back in the 90's). If the manufacturer is standing behind their product, they will pay for the repairs. GOOD LUCK! Is saving a few bucks on an oil filter really worth the risk of a $4000 repair bill? Your decision...

Not mentioned in the TSB, but a valid reason for denial of warranty coverage is damage caused by foreign material introduced into the oil filter by the person changing the oil. You can not expect a manufacturer to pay for engine damage caused by carelessness during an oil change, that kind of damage is not due to a manufacturing defect! Anything in the center of the filter goes directly into the oil galley when the engine is started. When you open an oil container and pre-fill the oil filter, be very careful that you do introduce into the center of the filter any of these into the filter:

dirt or debris from your hands or the work area
a bit of sealing foil from the top of the oil container
plastic shavings from the oil container
plastic or paper from the oil filter wrapping or container
 
Here's what I got when "googling" TSB 09-003-01. It has ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to do with filters.


Date: May 4, 2001

Models: All (BR/BE) Ram Truck

2001 (AB) Ram Van/Wagon
2001 (AN) Dakota
2001 (BR/BE) Ram Pickup
2001 (DN) Durango
2001 (JR) Sebring Sedan/Stratus Sedan/Sebring Convertible
2002 (KJ) Liberty
2001 (LH) Concorde/Intrepid/LHS/300M
2001 (PL) Neon
2001 (PR) Prowler
2001 (PT) PT Cruiser
2001 (RG) Chrysler Voyager (International Markets)
2001 (RS) Town & Country/Caravan/ Voyager
2001 (SR) Viper
2001 (ST) Seebring Coupe
2001 (TJ) Wrangler
2001 (WG) Grand Cherokee (International Markets)
2001 (WJ) Grand Cherokee
2001 (XJ) Cherokee

NOTE: This bulletin applies to all DaimleChrysler models / engines built before and after the 2001 model year.

Discussion:

Engine oil additives/supplements (EOS) should not be used to enhance engine oil performance. Engine oil additives/supplements should not be used to extend engine oil change intervals. No additive is known to be safe for engine durability and can degrade emission components. Additives can contain undesirable materials that harm the long term durability of engines by:

Doubling the level of Phosphorus in engine oil. The ILSAC (International Lubricant Standard Approval Committee) GF2 and GF3 standards require that engine oil contain no more than 0.01% Phosphorus to protect the vehicles emissions performance. Addition of engine oil additives/supplements can poison, from added sulfur and phosphorus, catalysts and hinder efforts to guarantee our emissions performance to 80,000 miles and new requirements of 150,000 miles.
Altering the viscosity characteristics of the engine oil so that it no longer meets the requirements of the specified viscosity grade.
Creating potential for an undesirable additive compatibility interaction in the engine crankcase.
Generally it is not desirable to mix additive packages from different suppliers in the crankcase; there have been reports of low temperature of low temperature engine failures caused by additive package incompatibility with such mixtures.



Policy: Information Only

NOTES:

What does this TSB mean? Use a quality oil that meets the API and viscosity specifications for your engine, and forget the mouse milk additives! Also - do not mix different brands of oil in your crankcase.
 
Last edited:
There is a TSB that pertains to Fram filters on Dodge Cummins diesel engines. This TSB is 10-15 years old I think. I agree, what was posted is not the exact language of the TSB, but that bulletin from Dodge is out there.

http://dodgeram.info/tsb/2001/09-004-01.htm

The top half is the actual TSB. The bottom half, what was posted above, appears to be some commentary from someone not at Dodge.
 
There's only one engine from Mopar with piston cooling oil jets, that would be mine. The 6.1 liter 425hp.

Absolutely NO TSB for anything like stated above.
 
All the Cummins B series engines have them-and Fram & Wix filters disintegrated and spewed media downstream into the piston cooling nozzles, causing pistons to melt through-and those engines have been used in Dodge Ram 2500 & up models since '89 (and lots of other places as well). NO OCOD IN MY $10K+ ENGINE!!
 
Actually all SRT Turbo engines have them in the 2.4 World and the old 2.4 Turbo in the PT Cruisers and SRT4 Neons.

Originally Posted By: SteveSRT8
There's only one engine from Mopar with piston cooling oil jets, that would be mine. The 6.1 liter 425hp.

Absolutely NO TSB for anything like stated above.
 
Originally Posted By: bullwinkle
All the Cummins B series engines have them-and Fram & Wix filters disintegrated and spewed media downstream into the piston cooling nozzles, causing pistons to melt through-and those engines have been used in Dodge Ram 2500 & up models since '89 (and lots of other places as well). NO OCOD IN MY $10K+ ENGINE!!


X2. The TSB was for the old 5.9L Cummins. Filters were coming apart and causing major engine damage so Ddoge came out with an approved filter list. I posted the info like 3-4 days ago here in a thread about filters for the Cummins.
 
Last edited:
The TSB for the Cummins is from when they changed from the 12-valve to the 24-valve...the 24-valve created more heat and higher pressures that caused the rubber in filters (more than just Fram) to disintegrate and the can on lesser filters to balloon. The rubber pieces disintegrating caused oiling passages to plug. The media actually didn't fail, the rubber pieces did.

In my opinion, the problem was actually Mopar's and Cummins' fault for not releasing updated information for the new engine release and people using old 12-valve filters on the 24-valve (not a fault of the filter manufacturer's). You don't see Hastings, Wix, Baldwin, or others on that list either...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom