Modern Parable (American Automaker Problems)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
May 11, 2004
Messages
1,562
Location
St. Paul, MN
Unsure of the source, found it on another website. Some of you may have seen it before, this is the first time for me.


" A Japanese company ( Toyota ) and an American company (Ford) decided to
have a canoe race on the Missouri River . Both teams practiced long and
hard to reach their peak performance before the race.

On the big day, the Japanese won by a mile.

The Americans, very discouraged and depressed, decided to investigate
the reason for the crushing defeat. A management team made up of senior
management was formed to investigate and recommend appropriate action.

Their conclusion was the Japanese had 8 people rowing and 1 person
steering, while the American team had 8 people steering and 1 person rowing.

Feeling a deeper study was in order, American management hired a
consulting company and paid them a large amount of money for a second
opinion. They advised, of course, that too many people were steering the boat,
while not enough people were rowing.

Not sure of how to utilize that information, but wanting to prevent
another loss to the Japanese, the rowing team's management structure was
totally reorganized to 4 steering supervisors, 3 area steering
superintendents, and 1 assistant superintendent steering manager.

They also implemented a new performance system that would give the 1
person rowing the boat greater incentive to work harder. It was called the
'Rowing Team Quality First Program,' with meetings, dinners, and free pens
for the rower. There was discussion of getting new paddles, canoes, and
other equipment, extra vacation days for practices and bonuses.

The next year the Japanese won by two miles.

Humiliated, the American management laid off the rower for poor
performance, halted development of a new canoe, sold the paddles, and
canceled all capital investments for new equipment. The money saved was
distributed to the Senior Executives as bonuses and the next year's racing
team was out-sourced to India .

Sadly, The End.

Here's something else to think about:
Ford has spent the last thirty years moving all its factories out of the
US , claiming they can't make money paying American wages.

TOYOTA has spent the last thirty years building more than a dozen plants
inside the US . "
 
for many years the japanese built superior cars their quality could not be beat their cars and light trucks lasted the longest and got the best gas mileage on the average they were reliable and held their resale because everyone wanted a reliable fuel sipping automobile that lasted many many reliable years. The american cars had all kinds of problems and they were not as reliable... The American car companies just a couple of years ago decided they were losing sales and are still trying to catch up and build the quality cars the Japanese have been building for a long time. Today the American cars are built pretty good and reliable problem is people remember they got burned and most wont let that happen again, me i own mostly American cars and trucks and have owned them all my life with the exception of a Toyota which is a great car.. Being in the engine rebuilding business i can say the Americans build a great engine today that will stand up to anything the Japanese can build. We are seeing a lot of Japanese engines here in the shop but there are a lot of japanese cars out there..The American auto makers learned a hard lesson and are still paying for their mistakes. Its funny back in the early seventies people used to laugh and make fun of the Inexpensive toyotas now they are everything but inexpensive..I guess the laugh was on us and me too...
 
Last edited:
I was a solitary rower. When I retired, it took 2 temps and 1 permanent worker to replace me, and finally had to out-source the work to another site that still had a few quality old timers that knew how to row.
 
I could only agree except my 2006 Toyota p/u is way poorer build quality than the 1992 and 1984 I have owned. The few dollars that would increase the quality of the cars instead goes into the top managements compensation package.
 
What most don't really have a grip on is size. At one time we had a ton more steal mills than were ever needed by a world not at war. We had more shipyards operating at higher capacity than anyone needed either. We don't have them anymore ..or at least to the same degree. It's the same with domestic car manufacturers. They're way bigger than need be ..especially with competition.
 
You forgot the Ford boat was paying their rower $100,000, more than the combined pay for the eight Japanese rowers, thereby leaving Ford unable to hire more rowers. They then told him that until he could do the work of seven other rowers they had to lay him off being that they were almost bankrupt, so he called all the other boat rowers together and they striked. It didn't matter much anyway, as Ford had very little in the way of boats to row, being that America sacrificed quality over price and bought the cheap little four cylinder Japanese rowboats that had poor fit and finish but a cheaper price tag.

Meanwhile in middle America some young kid buys a Japanese rowboat and puts a Wal-mart resonater muffler on it and thinks he has a hotrod.

Your point?
 
Originally Posted By: kingrob
You forgot the Ford boat was paying their rower $100,000, more than the combined pay for the eight Japanese rowers, thereby leaving Ford unable to hire more rowers. They then told him that until he could do the work of seven other rowers they had to lay him off being that they were almost bankrupt, so he called all the other boat rowers together and they striked. It didn't matter much anyway, as Ford had very little in the way of boats to row, being that America sacrificed quality over price and bought the cheap little four cylinder Japanese rowboats that had poor fit and finish but a cheaper price tag.

Meanwhile in middle America some young kid buys a Japanese rowboat and puts a Wal-mart resonater muffler on it and thinks he has a hotrod.

Your point?


BAH HAAHAAHHAHAH.

To add to that, Ford has lots of US and Canadian plants. The cheaper cars are built in Mexico. Hardly the farce that they are moving all their production out of The US.

Somebody is just Import-horny, so they concocted this ridiculous parable.
 
Originally Posted By: kingrob
You forgot the Ford boat was paying their rower $100,000, more than the combined pay for the eight Japanese rowers, thereby leaving Ford unable to hire more rowers.



No, the American team had a 500 man canoe ..but was only allowed to match the Japanese crew man for man. They still had to pay for the missing 492 missing paddlers.
 
Originally Posted By: Pablo
That would fit better if the American crew demanded 3X the pay because their feelings were hurt and plan on striking next year.


Having been an involuntary member of a union, I couldn't agree more.

Clark
 
I would have thought the American team's board of directors hired a new CEO from a different industry, who also hired new rowers, all from different industries also. none had ever ridden in a boat before but fully believed in sink or swim.

On the other hand, the Japanese team had rowed boats for 20 years, and from the president down everyone knew what was involved with every aspect of boats.
 
Auto manufacturing was just the easiest way to soak up wealth and distribute it in watershed employment. It wasn't selfless ..as far as jobs programs go. There were plenty of meaty compensation programs for all involved. One of Dana's plants in Reading, PA was more or less a "job shop". Military chassis ..postal chassis ..it didn't matter ...all on a "T&M" with a multiplier for the company and the plant supervision/management.

The Japanese appeared to figure out how to get "good jobs" for their people instead of just figuring out the easiest way to make jobs. Not that they too aren't experiencing their own maturing issues as they move on here.
 
Originally Posted By: mechtech2
I wonder who the Japanese copied their actual rowing style from?


They had some excellent American coaches, such as Deming who was ignored by American industry after WWII.
 
Originally Posted By: mechtech2
I wonder who the Japanese copied their actual rowing style from?


They initially copied it from powerful early american rowers of whom they were not in competition with at the time. They then studied it and figured out all of the ways to refine it to a science. All of the team learned the same technique. They offered their refined technique to the american team but the american team blew it off as slow and cumbersome and unamerican.

At that same time the egocentric americans only competed with themselves and although fast with their contemporaries, they were slower then the japanese. on the other hand they were making a lot of quick sprints and had lots of chrome and cushy seats on their boat. quick sprints and chrome had always won the american races in the past.

eventually the water in the american side of the pond dried up to a puddle as they were waiting for the gov't to build them a new canal system to bring water in from 100 miles away. The japanese had anticipated the pond running out of water and built a pumping system on their side years ago with corporate money. To this day the japanese are refining rowing techniques while the american team is standing in the mud with their hands out.
 
Originally Posted By: mechtech2
I wonder who the Japanese copied their actual rowing style from?


Both the Americans and the Japanese learned much of their style and craft from the Germans.

The German canoes cost at least double the price of their American or Japanese counterparts though.

The Japanese would randomly "borrow" styling cues from the German boats and certain technologies....

The German canoes had incredibly fit rowers and were very efficient. Easily besting both the American and Japanese offerings in terms of rowing-power and speed. Unfortunately the reliability of their craft began to suffer when they kept trying to add more and more "features" to them.

While the Japanese were able to capitalize on using Americans to "assemble" the canoes they were selling to the American market (using mostly Japanese parts) to make them feel like they were "part of the culture", the Unions at the American canoe factories were demanding more money and refusing to take cuts, even though the company was telling them that if they did not, they would soon have no jobs at all! They would then go on strike, refusing to row, while still having to be dragged around in the canoe and paid to be doing so.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom