OVERKILL
$100 Site Donor 2021
Originally Posted By: Spazdog
Originally Posted By: skyship
Interesting discussion and as a Brit living in Germany I would like to point out to the US readers not familiar with the statistics of WW2, that the US was not involved to any major extent in combat ops in the EU (Hollywood was!).
The Russians lost 20 million people, about 10 million red army and the rest civilians.
The Germans lost 10 million folks, about 7 million servicemen and the rest civilians.
The USA lost 276,000 (I forget the exact figure) in combat and 143,000 servicemen in non combat accidents, POW or illness etc. More US Army troops were killed in Jeep roll overs, flying accidents and friendly fire accidents than the Germans shot.
The USA did not suffer the same losses in Europe as the Soviets, true. But we weren't fighting on our mainland and we were fighting on two fronts. Our "Eastern Front" was the Pacific. Philippines, Guadalcanal, Iwo Jima, Kwajalein Atoll Marshall Islands... arguably as fiercely contested as Europe. The Chinese had almost as many civillian deaths as the Soviets did.
The Japanese were not an easy opponent. Midway was the first battle their Navy had lost in 300 years
The numbers do not tell the story. The Canadians suffered about 45,000 lives lost, but few who know their story would say that they did not fight with valor. (the Canadians were largely regarded as better marksmen than their British counterparts, possibly from the numbers who grew up hunting.)
That was how my grandmother's brothers served. And yes, you are quite right, that we were regarded as better marksman and I believe for precisely the reason you've mentioned.
Interestingly enough, my grandfather, who was of German lineage fought in the RCAF as a tail gunner and later a boot camp sergeant.
Originally Posted By: skyship
Interesting discussion and as a Brit living in Germany I would like to point out to the US readers not familiar with the statistics of WW2, that the US was not involved to any major extent in combat ops in the EU (Hollywood was!).
The Russians lost 20 million people, about 10 million red army and the rest civilians.
The Germans lost 10 million folks, about 7 million servicemen and the rest civilians.
The USA lost 276,000 (I forget the exact figure) in combat and 143,000 servicemen in non combat accidents, POW or illness etc. More US Army troops were killed in Jeep roll overs, flying accidents and friendly fire accidents than the Germans shot.
The USA did not suffer the same losses in Europe as the Soviets, true. But we weren't fighting on our mainland and we were fighting on two fronts. Our "Eastern Front" was the Pacific. Philippines, Guadalcanal, Iwo Jima, Kwajalein Atoll Marshall Islands... arguably as fiercely contested as Europe. The Chinese had almost as many civillian deaths as the Soviets did.
The Japanese were not an easy opponent. Midway was the first battle their Navy had lost in 300 years
The numbers do not tell the story. The Canadians suffered about 45,000 lives lost, but few who know their story would say that they did not fight with valor. (the Canadians were largely regarded as better marksmen than their British counterparts, possibly from the numbers who grew up hunting.)
That was how my grandmother's brothers served. And yes, you are quite right, that we were regarded as better marksman and I believe for precisely the reason you've mentioned.
Interestingly enough, my grandfather, who was of German lineage fought in the RCAF as a tail gunner and later a boot camp sergeant.