Mobil 1 ESP 0w-30 now meets SQ engine test requirements

Not sure what value the Lubrizol Relative Performance Comparison Tool has when you can't directly compare values between specs.

Because the value of the 0-10 scale apparently changes for the different specs in your example the 3 could actually be better than the 4.
Correct, the charts show areas of emphasis, not absolute or quantitative values.
 
If I had to guess, it’s the same exact stuff with a pretty new label.
Mobil 1 Advance Fuel Economy just came out with this same dark green label replacing the old grassy light green. I was at Walmart today, but didn't take a picture. So that makes me think something in the formulation of Mobil 1 Advanced Fuel Economy has been changed.
 
No API donut and only meets or exceeds, no certifications? Odd.
Not odd.

It meets or exceeds the engine test requirements.

But, it does not meet the bench test requirements because it exceeds the SQ limit for ZDDP.

Too much of a wear reducing additive. The horror.
 
Mobil 1 Advance Fuel Economy just came out with this same dark green label replacing the old grassy light green. I was at Walmart today, but didn't take a picture. So that makes me think something in the formulation of Mobil 1 Advanced Fuel Economy has been changed.
New look, same great taste!

I’m not convinced that the color of the label changes the formula.
 
I’m not convinced that the color of the label changes the formula.
Regarding the food goods (FDA, I guess), if a manufacturer changes some of the ingredients of a current product or a medicine, they also need to change its packaging. That tells the customers that something is new. That's is in the food industry, but it may apply to oils too.
 
Last edited:
Regarding the food goods (FDA, I guess), if a manufacturer change some of the ingredients of a current product or a medicine, they also need to change its packaging. That tells the customers that something is new. That's is in the food industry, but it may apply to oils too.
Could be. But, I think oil companies are changing their labeling due to SQ now being a thing. And, if they’re already doing that, it’s not a bad time to update/refresh/modernize the labeling on their products.

Also, I’m not sure if this is accurate, but I have read in a few places that the 4-digit number after the lot # on a Mobil 1 bottle is the code for that specific formula.

If that is the case, the new bottle in my original post has a “formula code” of 6925 which is the same as the previously labeled version that I bought for my next oil change.

New:

IMG_2749.webp


Old:

IMG_2748.webp



I should shoot an email over to Mobil and ask if this is actually true.
 
Not odd.

It meets or exceeds the engine test requirements.

But, it does not meet the bench test requirements because it exceeds the SQ limit for ZDDP.

Too much of a wear reducing additive. The horror.
It doesn't list a single certification, to me that's odd. What's next? They are gonna write 'identifies itself as...' and long list of 'genders'?
 
It doesn't list a single certification, to me that's odd.
It's odd only to you because you don't know oil specification/certifications. The oil is rated ACEA C3 and has approvals by Mercedes-Benz, VW, and Porsche that are very stringent approvals. Those are much stringent than your API donut. It's an oil designed for the Euro market. Nobody cares about API over there. People only care the oil to cover their car manufacturer requirements that are listed on the bottle.

ACEA C-GRADE OILS: LOW-SAPS AND MID-SAPS​

In the lubrication industry, phosphorus and sulfur are used as core additives. They add strong anti-wear, antioxidant, and anti-friction characteristics to engine oils. Despite their strong properties, a high concentration of these substances can poison and damage the vehicle’s diesel particulate filter and two-way catalytic converter. That is why ACEA sets strict recommendations on how much phosphorus and sulfur should be applied to engine oil.

Engine oils with a lower amount of phosphorus and sulfur are called low-SAPS oils, also low-ash oils. These oils belong to the C category in ACEA’s oil classification, where “c” stands for catalyst-compatible.

According to ACEA, C-grade oils are stable, low-friction, and low-viscosity oils. They are used in vehicles equipped with diesel particulate filters (DPFs) and three-way catalytic converters (TWCs). C-grade oils are also used in high-performance diesel and petrol engines that require the use of oils with low levels of SAPS content.

C3 MID-SAPS OILS​

C3 are mid-SAPS oils with a sulfated content lower than 0.8%. Those are low-friction and have a minimum HT/HS viscosity of 3.5 cP.
https://www.valvolineglobal.com/en-ksa/understanding-oil-standards-acea-specifications/
 
Last edited:
Ok, maybe not certifications but approvals, none on the back of the bottle according to the pix.
Personally, at least with my cars that require only API SM oil, I fancy oils that are C2/C3, VW 504/507 and MB 229.52.
 
Ok, maybe not certifications but approvals, none on the back of the bottle according to the pix.
Personally, at least with my cars that require only API SM oil, I fancy oils that are C2/C3, VW 504/507 and MB 229.52.
May want to look again, specifically says "Has the following builder approvals" and then lists 229.51/229.52, VS 504/507 and Porsche C30.
 
Ok, maybe not certifications but approvals, none on the back of the bottle according to the pix.
Personally, at least with my cars that require only API SM oil, I fancy oils that are C2/C3, VW 504/507 and MB 229.52.
Exxon/Mobil is always very punctual with specifications vs. approvals. No oil blender is that good in that. Perhaps Motul.
 
Not odd.

It meets or exceeds the engine test requirements.

But, it does not meet the bench test requirements because it exceeds the SQ limit for ZDDP.

Too much of a wear reducing additive. The horror.
For the approvals, they need to limit how much Phosphorus goes into the cats, which in a simplified manner, a function of how much oil gets burned (volatility) and amount of Phosphorus in that oil that is burned

API puts a high(er) limit on the volatility, and limita Phosphorus more strictly.

ACEA limits volatility more strictly, and in return more lenient towards phosphorus.
 
Back
Top Bottom