Mobil 1 ESP 0w-30 now meets SQ engine test requirements

Joined
Jul 22, 2007
Messages
852
Location
Texas
I would assume it met the engine test requirements before SQ was even a thing. Pleased to see that it still doesn’t have the API donut.

Looks like the “prior version” had 229.31, and this one does not. But, I believe 229.31 is superseded by 229.51. So, it doesn’t matter anyway.

If I had to guess, it’s the same exact stuff with a pretty new label.

I didn’t see another thread about this. So, sorry if this is a repost.

IMG_2464.webp
IMG_2466.webp
 
Looks like the “prior version” had 229.31, and this one does not. But, I believe 229.31 is superseded by 229.51. So, it doesn’t matter anyway.
Thanks, It does look like that is the case.
If I had to guess, it’s the same exact stuff with a pretty new label.
This new label has quite a bit more of a green hue to it on the front label. :unsure:
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: GW.
Hopefully same formula, I just settled on it this year. That being said, anything with equivalent specs should do, but ESP is the only one I find regularly available at one of my local Walmarts. The sopus C3 oils are never there, no Pennzoil or quaker state. Several jugs of esp.
 
https://online.lubrizol.com/relperftool/pc.html

with the disclaimer that if oil #1 is a "3" and oil #2 is a 4, that does not mean that oil #2 is 25% better.

that chart isn't constructed that way

Not sure what value the Lubrizol Relative Performance Comparison Tool has when you can't directly compare values between specs.

Because the value of the 0-10 scale apparently changes for the different specs in your example the 3 could actually be better than the 4.
 
thats what i said in other words... true 5-30 is more popular for average driver,i just said it bcs. more and more people search for a more pao-ester oil even for a daily driving..so we are the 1% only? :)..
Idk. I mean internet provides information, but makes people go crazy over irrelevant stuff too.
 
Back
Top Bottom