- Joined
- Sep 28, 2002
- Messages
- 39,798
Quote:
they can make ligitimate points on showing a $30 oil test doesnt show more then 1/4 of what really going on
...so? Anyone will state that UOA is much better at telling you if the oil is suitable for use. That's all that one wants to prove in that situation. The metals can be off the scale or totally flat lined.
I would tend to say that in this case UOA is uniquely qualified to state the consumer's case in such litigation.
You're also correct in that a lawyer, in representing the client's best interests, can probably manage to effectively argue (I love this: XS650) that fleas are there to benefit the dog.
they can make ligitimate points on showing a $30 oil test doesnt show more then 1/4 of what really going on
...so? Anyone will state that UOA is much better at telling you if the oil is suitable for use. That's all that one wants to prove in that situation. The metals can be off the scale or totally flat lined.
I would tend to say that in this case UOA is uniquely qualified to state the consumer's case in such litigation.
You're also correct in that a lawyer, in representing the client's best interests, can probably manage to effectively argue (I love this: XS650) that fleas are there to benefit the dog.