I’m not at all worried about asking a simple question on someone’s thread that seems to be a fan of Schaffer’s oil. Why don’t you two stop muddying up this guys thread and have some relevant input?
I’m not at all worried about asking a simple question on someone’s thread that seems to be a fan of Schaffer’s oil. Why don’t you two stop muddying up this guys thread and have some relevant input?
I’m not at all worried about asking a simple question on someone’s thread that seems to be a fan of Schaffer’s oil. Why don’t you two stop muddying up this guys thread and have some relevant input?
I’m not at all worried about asking a simple question on someone’s thread that seems to be a fan of Schaffer’s oil. Why don’t you two stop muddying up this guys thread and have some relevant input?
Thanks for saying that; IMHO your question wasn't out of bounds since I had mentioned Schaeffer - AND it's in my signature AND I've mentioned numerous times on here that I almost became a rep (squashed by disease-that-shall-not-be-named))
A new thread is another correct solution ... but there's just too much opportunity for drama I guess. "Muddied waters" LOL truth.
To answer your question reasonably and without judgement - every analysis I've had done with Schaeffer has had a good slug of moly, so yes I think that is part of their usual formulation.