Its not "peddling" if its true. The top four richest people on the Earth are US citizens, people get paid for their inventions, some of which you use everyday and are presently using to argue that you are marginally relevant. The world you live in would not be possible without Andrew Carnegie, JD Rockefeller, Henry Ford, Thomas Edison, Eli Whitney, George Westinghouse and Charles Goodyear. You know that to be true but still think semantics matters in your point of view.
I gave you numerous examples that you've flagrantly ignored because it doesn't jive with the Amero-centric "the earth revolves around me, look how important I am" view you've invested in.
The world we live in would be quite different without Carl Benz, and Henry Ford wouldn't have an automobile to mass produce.
Red Fife wheat, a Canadian invention, is the basis for all modern wheat strains in North America.
Without the Canadian, British, French and German scientists, the Manhattan project wouldn't have happened, and the world would be a very different place right now.
The Internet we are currently arguing on wouldn't exist without Alexander Graham Bell.
It's not semantics, you've outright misrepresented or invented history to suit what you are peddling, a world I'll use again because it accurately describes the revisionist history you are pushing here for the sake of your massive, and totally unjustified ego, vicariously living successes you had nothing to do with while demanding the rest of us just blindly swallow your appalling perversion of history. That's not going to happen.
Amusingly, you continue to demonstrate exactly what
@IndyIan was talking about, while not being bright enough to understand the point he was making.