Michigan lawmakers demand their "cut"

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Apr 11, 2003
Messages
3,037
Location
USA
This is an article appearing in the New York Times on October 22, 2008, written by Nick Bunkley. I couldn't get the link to work properly.

I love the last paragraph. My interpretation? "We got caught with our pants down on car lots overflowing with fuel inefficient vehicles. Now the taxpayer should fund our research, design, and manufacturing of fuel-efficient automobiles!"

DETROIT — Michigan’s Congressional delegation is urging the Treasury secretary and the Federal Reserve chairman to use their authority as part of the $700 billion bailout package to help more consumers obtain car loans, warning that the tightened credit markets were endangering millions of jobs.

The effort, led by Representatives John D. Dingell, a Democrat, and Fred Upton, a Republican, comes amid plunging vehicle sales as auto lenders struggle to find financing.

In addition, two of Detroit’s automakers, General Motors and Chrysler, are considering a merger to combine their cash reserves and cut costs.

“In this current economic environment, it is imperative that the government ensures that liquidity is restored so that the U.S. auto industry is able to function until normalcy is restored to credit markets,” the lawmakers say in a draft of a letter to the Treasury secretary, Henry M. Paulson Jr., and the Fed chairman, Ben S. Bernanke, that was obtained by The New York Times.
Automakers say that a lack of financing has compounded a weakened economy and kept consumers out of showrooms. The industry says that more than 90 percent of new-vehicle purchases are financed.

As of late Wednesday, all but three of Michigan’s 17-member delegation had signed the letter, and the others are expected to join as well, according to a person involved in the effort, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because the letter was not intended to become public until Thursday.

“It’s time for the Bush administration to finally step up and aid the auto industry,” Representative Joe Knollenberg, a Republican, said in a statement. “I spoke to Secretary Paulson personally about using these new powers to restore liquidity in the automotive sector. Now is the time for action. The domestic auto industry can’t wait any longer.”

The letter says that one in 10 jobs in the United States depends on the auto industry, asserting that “there is no single segment of America’s economy that is more critical to the financial well-being of millions of Americans.”

Vehicle sales in the United States fell 26.6 percent in September, a 15-year low.

Early statistics show that sales have been at least as poor in October. One analyst predicted that sales this month would reach the lowest level since 1983.

G.M. began running ads last week assuring consumers that they could still receive credit after its financing arm, the GMAC, said it would offer loans only to buyers with credit scores of at least 700.

The president of the California New Car Dealers Association, Peter K. Welch, warned that the move by GMAC, which handles financing for nearly half of G.M. sales, would force some dealerships out of business.

Congress approved $25 billion last month for government-backed loans to help automakers build more fuel-efficient vehicles.
The automakers, with the support of Michigan lawmakers, are pressing for quicker access to the loans, along with more money later, given that demand for vehicles with better fuel efficiency has soared since the loan program was created as part of an energy bill passed in December.
 
Good bye thread
frown.gif
 
Originally Posted By: Barkleymut
yup, with all of the bailouts we are already redistributing the wealth get ready for the hammer and sickle
Comrad Barkleymut ,I tend to agree!
 
Originally Posted By: lazaro
anyone know who received the most campaign contribution funding from Freddy Mac and Fannie May in the last 20 years?
28.gif

I would have to say look at the guys who pushed the bailout.
 
Originally Posted By: Barkleymut
yup, with all of the bailouts we are already redistributing the wealth get ready for the hammer and sickle


Hmm..the way it appears to me ..and has for quite a while, is all the cost redistribution. Get ready for the aristocracy or feudal system to get into full swing.

The Sheriff of Rottingham will collect his due ..err..and don't get caught poaching on the regent's land either.
 
I wasn't trying to get "political" with this topic when I posted it.

I guess my intent was to ask in a roundabout way, "where (and with what industry) does the bailout(s) stop?
 
Oh, I see. Well haven't you ever broke down and used a credit card that you really didn't want to ..but were kinda forced to? Well, it's a "while you're there" type thing.

We might as well get Billy his new school clothes ..Jill her prom dress ..and you needed that new laptop ..the tv is getting a little old ..and the tires are worn a bit on the family truckster.

..it's sorta like that. Everyone lines up for their "needs".
 
"....lines up for their "needs?"

It's more like "wants," Gary.

And there is a price to be paid, albeit quite steep, for all of those "needs." At least in this environment.

So, tell me, who steps up and finally says "NO!," and to whom?
 
Hey, NO should have been said many times. No to allowing the trade imbalance to import cheap junk and the poverty that it displaced. That would threaten too many's livelihoods ..you know ..the livelihoods that "count" ..so we couldn't do that.

There's lots of places where "no, that's not in the interest of the American people" ..but Americans ..most of them influential and powerful ..did it anyway.

Now that more people just realized that they too were merely cattle to the slaughterhouse ..NOW it's time to say NO.

People do tend to get what they deserve. To assume that you're one of the smart ones and deserved what you got ...

...got you what you got. Robbed.
 
Some people mistakenly think the auto companies design cars. They are actually designed by the government. Safety requirements, emission requirements, and now new CAFE requirements pulled out of the air are a burden to the automotive industry.

People have been buying gas-guzzling SUVs for the last two decades like there was no tomorrow. Before that, people were buying gas-guzzling muscle cars. The auto companies have always built what the people will buy.

Now the government is mandating that the auto companies built unprofitable econoboxes. The added CAFE burden recently imposed will cost the auto companies $80 billion to design and retool. Nobody is going to pay $30K for a car that saves gas.

The government is mandating supply. How are they going to mandate demand in the free market? What if gas stays under $3 a gallon and the public continues to buy SUVs? This is a big gamble the government is asking the auto companies to take when nobody knows what the price of gas will be 3-5 years from now.

The auto companies aren't asking for a handout like the financial market is getting, they're only asking for the government to back the loans they want to retool to meet the new government-imposed CAFE rules. Unlike the financial markets, the auto industry is actually planning on repaying these loans which will result in no cost to the taxpayer.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom