Maxima.org spreadsheet updated ---- with a couple of SuperSyn Results

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Jul 24, 2002
Messages
79
Location
TN
The latest revision includes 8 to 10 new analyses....including a couple with the SuperSyn Mobil 1 results:

http://bill99gxe.home.mindspring.com/Oil Analysis Results.zip

Patman,

I know you were/are interested about Moly content in the SuperSyn Mobil 1 formulations. A couple of new submissions backs up your contentions:

Member srbarnes4ever, in the "2000+ Maximas" worksheet, who had used Amsoil until recent 'bad' analyses went to a SuperSyn/Tri-Syn blend, where Moly all of a sudden appeared.

In addition, member exunaja in the same worksheet, used the Tri-Syn formula until a few months back, and his last 2 changes have been with SuperSyn.

This is a direct slap in the face to my SuperSyn baseline analysis I had performed, which did not show any moly in the SuperSyn bottle I used for a sample.
dunno.gif
 
Thanks for posting this! I will download the document when I get to work tomorrow (for some reason I can't unzip it here at home, but it works great at work)
 
I have never been able to unzip it? Any tips on this problem?

Actually I can unzip it,,but it is some kind of computer language/text.
 
Bill 99, thank you for the interesting Maxima spreadsheet post. Sometimes the results are confusing from the standpoint that it seems that the wear numbers actually increased when a better synthetic was used. This is something I find puzzling. If someone ran a regular dino so-so oil, then converted to one of the better oils, did the better oil free up impacted junk and clean off the internals putting the wear metals into suspension? The wear pattern can change? If the same better oil was used again for a refill would the wear numbers simmer down? In some instances apparently not. I guess that's why we're all searching for the best choice in our particular applications.
 
Looks okay here but I'm sure there are MS'isms in there, being it's Excel on Win2K saving to HTML. If Bill says it's okay I'll try harder. At least a pdf version. He may have his own ideas for exports.

David
 
I know it'll work for sure when I get to work, as I have Excel on there, and I've always been able to unzip this document there. Plus it'll give me something to do at work, we probably won't be too busy today.
smile.gif
 
Bill, that was more of a slap in the face with M1 SS when they must have seen how their oil was responding to our timken tests with out the moly. I think that after seeing their so called new "antiwear" technology at work they must have felt compelled to make a modified addtion. It's kinda amazing what we can find out just by taking a some simple tests, and find what is happening on a oil.

Another point I want to make is, notice that even Mobil being a full synth found it needed to add a good barrier additive to help prevent wear and that the base oil doesn't play as much of a part in wear protection as one would think since it is a full synth. Sorry, just can't leave that alone, so many want to say full synth's have or provide a better hydrodynamic film strength but here is just another prime example on how a full synth rely's on barrier additives like all the other oils do to help reduce the wear levels.
 
quote:

Originally posted by dragboat:
I have never been able to unzip it? Any tips on this problem?

Actually I can unzip it,,but it is some kind of computer language/text.


dragboat,

You're welcome to e-mail me for the unzipped version. I'm just trying to keep everyone's download time to a minimum, but I'm probably the only one on the planet using dial-up anymore anyway.

The only weirdness with downloading from a mindspring account involves personal firewalls like BlackICE, ZoneAlarm Pro, etc. You have to turn them off to be able to download the file at all. I'm not sure why you got the garbled text out of the zip file....
 
quote:

Originally posted by Bill J.:
Bill 99, thank you for the interesting Maxima spreadsheet post. Sometimes the results are confusing from the standpoint that it seems that the wear numbers actually increased when a better synthetic was used. This is something I find puzzling. If someone ran a regular dino so-so oil, then converted to one of the better oils, did the better oil free up impacted junk and clean off the internals putting the wear metals into suspension? The wear pattern can change? If the same better oil was used again for a refill would the wear numbers simmer down? In some instances apparently not. I guess that's why we're all searching for the best choice in our particular applications.

Your contention can be backed up with member BriGuyMax in the 95 to 99 Maximas worksheet, where he went from Castrol GTX to Mobil 1 Tri-Syn and his oil consumption increased as well as his ring wear. He wasn't a happy camper about that, nor should he be.

In that same worksheet, member iwannabmw went from Mobil 1 Tri-Syn to Amsoil, with little noticeable difference in overall wear.

Again the same worksheet, member bags533 used Castrol Syntec Blend (a relatively poor oil empirically) for 2 7,000 mile intervals and then switched to Amsoil for 7,000 miles against my advice. As you can see the "neglect" in my opinion caused the Amsoil to be placed in a fairly acidic environment, and it didn't last that long either compared to my experiences.

Sometimes you have to see the specific oil history to know whether wear levels increasing are directly attributable to what oil you've used or how your oil changes have fared in the past. BriGuyMax's case is the best reflection of a synthetic not necessarily being better than any dino oil, which is one reason why I recommend Castrol GTX for any Maxima looking for a good quality dino oil (the other being how well Castrol GTX has performed historically in quite a few Maximas).

The main thing I've learned is that there is not a universal oil for everyone in every circumstance for every car.
smile.gif
 
quote:

Originally posted by OneQuartLow:
Looks okay here but I'm sure there are MS'isms in there, being it's Excel on Win2K saving to HTML. If Bill says it's okay I'll try harder. At least a pdf version. He may have his own ideas for exports.

David


David,

I got your e-mail. I've been meaning to turn the spreadsheet into a pdf file, I just keep forgetting to do so. I'm trying to keep a hold of where/how this thing is published, but I don't really care if you throw it up in html form.

Excel has a built-in PDF converter but I cannot get it to work:

I wrestled with Acrobat Distiller, etc. for 45 minutes or so today, and about 1/3 of the way through the conversion through Excell it's trying to "print" and gets hung up....Excel quits responding, etc. Obviously, I'm missing a setting, patch, or "update" to Office XP........
mad.gif


I have the full version of Acrobat 5, so if there's someway I can import the xls file in or some obvious setting I'm forgetting about, feel free to e-mail or post here and I'll try to get a pdf version up so it can be viewed more universally.
 
quote:

Originally posted by BOBISTHEOILGUY:
Bill, that was more of a slap in the face with M1 SS when they must have seen how their oil was responding to our timken tests with out the moly. I think that after seeing their so called new "antiwear" technology at work they must have felt compelled to make a modified addtion. It's kinda amazing what we can find out just by taking a some simple tests, and find what is happening on a oil.

Another point I want to make is, notice that even Mobil being a full synth found it needed to add a good barrier additive to help prevent wear and that the base oil doesn't play as much of a part in wear protection as one would think since it is a full synth. Sorry, just can't leave that alone, so many want to say full synth's have or provide a better hydrodynamic film strength but here is just another prime example on how a full synth rely's on barrier additives like all the other oils do to help reduce the wear levels.


What I don't get is how 60ppm of moly makes that much of a difference.
dunno.gif
With Redline, ULX-110, etc., they have 500+ppm of moly, so I guess it's easier for me see its usefulness.

I would get another quart of SuperSyn and send it in for a baseline sample to Oil Analyzers, but I'm going to wait until early next year to do so......don't want to get burned again.
mad.gif
 
Well, what many people don't understand it that Moly in such a high concentration is not needed. Moly plates in areas where frictional heat is present as this is what activates the plating action. After this has occurred, it is a sacrificial additive meaning it will wear off and when the heat levels become high enough for it to activate the moly, another one plates up in place of the one that was sacrificed. This is an on going process, so with minimal amounts of moly this situation can happen and still have reserve to maitain this condition for a long time. Now, from my understanding speaking with our chemist he stated that anything over approx 5% of moly(not sure but i suspect he's talking about additive level percents not oil percent) is wasted and that in Schaeffers case it's around 3%. So given this, I do believe Redline is overdoseing their barrier additive levels to such that in fact it really is causing slightly higher levels of oxidation on their oil. If I understand this correctly, Redline is primaraly a race oil design and given that, they do not have to worry so much on how well the oil will stand up to oxidation over extended period of time in car use as in racing the oil is constantly being changed and never taxes the detergent levels.
 
Bill99GXE,

Just a comment ....

If your Maxima buddies want to get an accurate reflection on how an oil is performing, they need to run the same formulation 2-3 times in a row. I would also recommend testing the 2nd or 3rd batch you run of a particular brand. If you keep changing types/brands of oil every time, you will never get the best results out of any formulation.

All the oils sold today are compatable, but that doesn't mean you'll see optimal results if you mix them. The additive chemistries are all different and there are different types of ZDDP and Calcium/Magnesium "additive packages" being used.

I do find it interesting that the 5w-20's seem to outperform the 5w30's in the Acura V-6 engines. That isn't a very impressive engine in terms of wear rates
frown.gif
 
Bob, Redline claims it's street oils can go 10-18k though. I wonder how this is possible if the oil oxidizes as fast as you say? I've never seen anyone push Redline as far as 18k though.
 
quote:

Originally posted by TooSlick:
Bill99GXE,

Just a comment ....

If your Maxima buddies want to get an accurate reflection on how an oil is performing, they need to run the same formulation 2-3 times in a row. I would also recommend testing the 2nd or 3rd batch you run of a particular brand. If you keep changing types/brands of oil every time, you will never get the best results out of any formulation.



The premise of my endeavor is real world, so brute force often applies. Most samples/results aren't optimal, but can be used as a framework for what oil(s) work, initially targeted for Maxima V6s but it is beginning to stretch out to other makes and engines.

I can't control what others do, but I have tried to mitigate such concerns by including oil history, change intervals, etc.

quote:

All the oils sold today are compatable, but that doesn't mean you'll see optimal results if you mix them. The additive chemistries are all different and there are different types of ZDDP and Calcium/Magnesium "additive packages" being used.



That is my primary basis for analyzing the baseline oils of the brands used most by labs with similar approaches so that such additive package differences can be illustrated and used to "normalize" most of the results.

I don't know why, call it experience or overanalyzing, but the VQ engine in Maximas is pretty easy for me to break down for other people. Wear patterns are now easier for me to spot and comment on as to what is or is not needed. Oil history has been the single biggest clue to discerning what is going on.

An example:

srbarnes4ever's Maxima in the 2000+ Maximas worksheet. Initially he had rather awful levels of chrome, iron, copper, tin, and lead so I recommended him halfing the interval on the same oil. He did so, and the second analysis showed much lower levels, with lead and tin the only ones still being higher than average. However the viscosity increased over a halfed interval.

At this point, he went to Mobil 1, a much thinner viscosity oil initially than Amsoil. It was run the same interval as the second analysis, and the third analysis came back looking quite well. Viscosity dropped, "insolubles" dropped (a measure of nitration, oxidation, and soot lumped together by Blackstone).

He is scared, so he is continuing to go 4k intervals a couple of more times until everything is consistently normal.

There are good results in all the analyses, you just have to do a fair bit of digging.

The MAIN reason for his wear is the VQ series engine in Maximas takes FOREVER to break-in....on the level of 10k miles using a dino oil! Those who have switched to synthetics early on (less than a few thousand total miles) are the ones who are showing some elevated wear levels in the 20k and 30k mileage range.....srbarnes4ever switched to synthetic at 1800 miles AND then went a long interval at 16k to 25k: not a good combination on this particular engine.

quote:

I do find it interesting that the 5w-20's seem to outperform the 5w30's in the Acura V-6 engines. That isn't a very impressive engine in terms of wear rates
frown.gif


That viscosity inference is a red herring. It's more indicative of the respective specific oil change interval histories rather than a 5W/30 being "better" per se. I don't have enough data to say one way or the other, but Amsoil 5W/20 is the only oil I've seen that at least stays somewhat respectable in the 20-weight viscosity range.

Most of the Acura people in my spreadsheet have gone WAY too long at an early mileage on a synthetic oil with only one filter. As you stated, the J-series Honda V6s exact A LOT of wear and stress on the oil and oil filter. I personally would recommend a similar break-in for the J-series Honda V6 as the VQ-series Maxima engines, although for a different reason: going to about 4k on the initial factory-fill oil (unless you change the filter) as Honda uses a lot of moly in their initial oil to facilitate proper break-in.

I personally see no way a Honda OEM filter (ESPECIALLY now that the US made ones are being phased out in favor of the fully Fram-derived Canadian ones) has any business going more than 4k
regardless of oil interval use.

Right now, member RussMaxManiac in the Honda V6 Vehicles worksheet is the only one who is using my break-in hypothesis for the J-series engine, using Pennzoil for 3k intervals up to 10 or 12k and then going synthetic. He has another sample going in soon, so it will be interesting to see what his results are.

Sorry for the novel.
rolleyes.gif
 
Regarding the Honda oil filters: Honda now recommends change intervals of 5,000 miles for severe service and 10,000 miles for all other applications, with the owner's choice of dino or synthetic oil. The initial drain for normal applications would not be until 10k. IMO, this would be acceptable with a good filter, but not with Fram (Honda USA OEM).
 
Hey Bill, you mentioned that the Castrol Synthetic Blend is somewhat of a weak oil, but you recommend the Castrol GTX for dino oil. Do you think the Castrol Syntec Blend is a poor oil overall , and that Castrol GTX is actually better ?, or was that just in reference to taking that oil 7000 miles. I've been using Castrol GTX and have recently switched to the Castrol Syntec Blend thinking that it is a slightly better oil compared to the GTX version. Although I do know that the amount of higher group base is very minimal in the Syntec Blend and it may not be all that great of a value compared to Castrol GTX, but I would think that it is a slightly better oil, unless the additive package is worse ?. Do you know something about the make-up of Castrol Syntec Blend compared to Castrol GTX ?, I'd be very interested to hear any info or opinion that you are willing to share as I am a fan of Castrol oils. thanks.

Joey
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom