Madness around Euro certifications

Status
Not open for further replies.
Originally Posted by SubieRubyRoo
Originally Posted by edyvw
How many Wal Mart's Austin has?


I've been to at least 3 WMs in the Austin area, and I've only visited the area for business. A quick Google search shows at least 11 WMs??

Maybe we should buy it and ship it to him?
 
Originally Posted by MaximaGuy
Folks:

The MB in the signature has been my first and possibly the last Euro vehicle.
What is this madness in certifications around these Euro vehicles, why all this numbering schemes and each one has their own.
Here its so simple choose the weight and you are done and come up with a 5K dino or 10K syn OCI and done. I haven't heard any American vehicle die or sludge out with the oils having sat on this forum forever.

Do Euro vehicles fail outside these certifications.? Pl. educate me, its driving me crazy, rather prefer pick a SN weight and move on,

Cheers



OK I'll bite. Over the past couple of years in order to meet more stringent CAFE standards Benz has transitioned much of their fleet from 6-cylinder to 4-cylinder engines AND thinner oils. Consequently a plethora of Oil Certs have came out. For years with regards to Benz it had only been 229.50 (gas) and 229.51 (diesel) for passenger cars.. BMW went through the same thing. In the US it was LL01,then LL04 (diesel) was added in 2009, by 2012 they added LL12FE, then LL14FE, and LL01FE. VW also went through similar changes.
 
Originally Posted by TiGeo
Originally Posted by 2004tdigls
Originally Posted by Superflan
I've seen numerous TDI PD engines with advanced cam lobes wear caused by wrong oil (not VW 505.01/504/507 compliant)



yes but thousands more have failed using VW blessed oil

http://forums.tdiclub.com/showthread.php?t=237678

There are UOA with CJ X-40 oils with drastically lower wear than approved oils

Ultimately it is not whether the oil is blessed by one vehicle manufacturer or not, wear is controlled by the quality of the base oil, additives and viscosity.


And there are thousands of gasoline Euro cars (VWs) driving around for 200K using whatever crap the quick lube joints put in...



Your statement is out of context. If you're talking about a OCI of 3k miles then ya bulk dino would be fine but if you're talking 10-15k OCI then no.
 
Originally Posted by MaximaGuy
Originally Posted by CT8
How many posts on BITOG are I need to clean the sludge from my engine?


Saw ONE post in the many years in the forum and that was because the owner "wasn't told" oil changes are necessary.

In any event, as most replies have said finding it isn't that easy, I had to order mine from Costco ( and I don't pay $6-$8 for the same oil from Advance Auto, Autozone etc. these folks shouldn't sell oil because there are $1/$2 higher than Walmart).

I'm surprised nobody noticed this comment.

I think we've all been trolled.

Scott
 
Originally Posted by TiGeo


And there are thousands of gasoline Euro cars (VWs) driving around for 200K using whatever crap the quick lube joints put in...


You must of forgotten about the longitudinal 1.8T oil sludge fiasco. Those Euro cars with the longitudinal 1.8T sludged with whatever crap the quick lube puts in as well as VW and Audi dealerships using Castrol GTX 5w30 in those engines.

Back then, the owner's manual wasn't strict in the wording. It was not specific about oil, it just had to meet one or more of the criteria: 502.00 oil or ACEA A3/B4, API SL, or 5w30 or 5w40. Since then, VW & Audi became very specific about which oil is needed.

Why don't you put your money where you mouth is and use whatever crap the quick lube joint would put into your 2018 VW's and follow the VW OCI?
 
Originally Posted by edyvw

Really, so do show us Lexus engine in GLE category that rivals MB engines? What Lexus engine rival current MB 3 liter twin turbo?


Not sure why you've fixated on Lexus, but any Lexus V-8 will slay the MB engine you cite, albeit with more displacement.
So will any pushrod performance Chevy V-8.
You should check out C&D's occasional track extravaganzas. Amazing how pushrod Chevy Camaros and Corvettes show Europe's best their taillights.
I can recall starting a thread about one of these track tests and using the line that German engineering proved no match for pushrod Chevy power and you can imagine the indignation that provoked.
You wanna talk specific output?
Show me a production NA Euro car engine that can meet the standard set by the Honda S2000.
Honda recommended no more than an API 10w30 for this engine.
Sorry, but Euro engineering really isn't all that grand by current standards, much as I've liked owning Euro cars in the past.
 
Originally Posted by fdcg27
Originally Posted by edyvw

Really, so do show us Lexus engine in GLE category that rivals MB engines? What Lexus engine rival current MB 3 liter twin turbo?


Not sure why you've fixated on Lexus, but any Lexus V-8 will slay the MB engine you cite, albeit with more displacement.
So will any pushrod performance Chevy V-8.
You should check out C&D's occasional track extravaganzas. Amazing how pushrod Chevy Camaros and Corvettes show Europe's best their taillights.
I can recall starting a thread about one of these track tests and using the line that German engineering proved no match for pushrod Chevy power and you can imagine the indignation that provoked.
You wanna talk specific output?
Show me a production NA Euro car engine that can meet the standard set by the Honda S2000.
Honda recommended no more than an API 10w30 for this engine.
Sorry, but Euro engineering really isn't all that grand by current standards, much as I've liked owning Euro cars in the past.

So you want to compare Lexus V8 to MB V8? MB has also engine in 6000ccm category, so does BMW. Putting engine from commercial truck in a car is not really achievement. BMW could put in M3 easily V8 4.4 Twin Turbo engine if they wanted, but than that would not be M3.
As for NA engines and output you are fixated on hp (based on your post, no wonder they can sell anything in this country). What matters more to the drivers is torque and where it is available. Yeah, Honda HAD that engine that did produce at that time biggest specific output, and? Where are those Honda engines now? Where is S2000 now? This is not talk about specialty engines and cars. This is talk why MB GLE 350 needs MB 229.5. And there is very good reason for that, and it is not because that engine cannot run on same oil I use in my Sienna. Toyota, Nissan, Honda etc especially Subaru, all recommend also heavy 5W30 or light W40 oils in Europe. Toyota for 2GR family of engines recommends C3 oils. Reason is sustain high speed which are normal in Europe, especially in biggest auto market, Germany. European manufacturers develop engines and recommend oils how they think it should be developed influenced by markets in their country. Is it necessary in the US? in 90% of cases not, as evidence of BMW for example that is moving older engines to lighter oils not because somehow suddenly they saw the light, but because average buyer of BMW in the US is buying that car for neighbors to see not for what actually is. Same is for Toyota and Subaru, as their average driver drives 20mph below speed limit in left lane.
As for current engineering is that why Toyota is using BMW's diesels and B48 and 58 in Supra? Maybe you should tell them to contact Honda and ask them for engine from S2000.
 
Last edited:
GM just came out with a DOHC hot-V twin turbo V8. Almost identical to what BMW had 10 years ago.

Also, it's not all about horsepower. I'd take an M4 over a lead-sled hellcat any day. Sports cars are about feel, driver engagement, and fun, not numbers on a pamphlet. Horsepower wars are for non-enthusiast, showboat types.
 
Originally Posted by fdcg27

You wanna talk specific output?
Show me a production NA Euro car engine that can meet the standard set by the Honda S2000.
Honda recommended no more than an API 10w30 for this engine.
Sorry, but Euro engineering really isn't all that grand by current standards, much as I've liked owning Euro cars in the past.


While the S2000 was indeed impressive, particularly the slightly more power dense but arguably less fun AP1 version at 123HP/L in its most powerful incarnation with an 11.7:1 compression ratio (versus the AP2 at 108HP/L), several years earlier BMW had produced the S70/2 for McLaren for use in the F1, which, in street trim produced 618HP (103HP/L) with an 11:1 compression ratio, or if you were one of the lucky buggers to end up with a few of the very limited production LM models, you received 680HP (113HP/L), very close to Honda's later AP1 figure, higher than that of the AP2 and at an only slightly less incredible redline of 8,500rpm. It of course also got to wear the title of fastest car in the world for a stint
wink.gif


Now, you DID say production, and while the BMW S62 (featured in the E39 M5) was indeed a production engine, its use in the Ascari A10 likely doesn't fit with your criteria, since the car was never mass produced. However it does beg mention I think for the simple fact that this 90's engine was able to go from producing a modest 400HP in sedan trim (80HP/L) to 625HP in Ascari trim (125HP/L).

I'm not sure why edyvw chose the MB engine he did
21.gif
Speaking specifically of sedans, the current AMG S65 is powered by a 621HP V12, and its slightly less powerful S63 sibling's 4.0L bi-turbo V8 produces 603HP. I don't believe Lexus makes anything in that ballpark.
 
Originally Posted by OVERKILL
Originally Posted by fdcg27

You wanna talk specific output?
Show me a production NA Euro car engine that can meet the standard set by the Honda S2000.
Honda recommended no more than an API 10w30 for this engine.
Sorry, but Euro engineering really isn't all that grand by current standards, much as I've liked owning Euro cars in the past.


While the S2000 was indeed impressive, particularly the slightly more power dense but arguably less fun AP1 version at 123HP/L in its most powerful incarnation with an 11.7:1 compression ratio (versus the AP2 at 108HP/L), several years earlier BMW had produced the S70/2 for McLaren for use in the F1, which, in street trim produced 618HP (103HP/L) with an 11:1 compression ratio, or if you were one of the lucky buggers to end up with a few of the very limited production LM models, you received 680HP (113HP/L), very close to Honda's later AP1 figure, higher than that of the AP2 and at an only slightly less incredible redline of 8,500rpm. It of course also got to wear the title of fastest car in the world for a stint
wink.gif


Now, you DID say production, and while the BMW S62 (featured in the E39 M5) was indeed a production engine, its use in the Ascari A10 likely doesn't fit with your criteria, since the car was never mass produced. However it does beg mention I think for the simple fact that this 90's engine was able to go from producing a modest 400HP in sedan trim (80HP/L) to 625HP in Ascari trim (125HP/L).

I'm not sure why edyvw chose the MB engine he did
21.gif
Speaking specifically of sedans, the current AMG S65 is powered by a 621HP V12, and its slightly less powerful S63 sibling's 4.0L bi-turbo V8 produces 603HP. I don't believe Lexus makes anything in that ballpark.

When one talks about specific output, we forget that in naturally aspirated engines more hp usually indicates torque at very high rpms.
For example engine in my Toyota has 245lb-ft at 4,500rpms. Engine is completely lathergic below 4000rpms. One would expect that engine would blew fire at 6,500rpm, but it literally runs out of air at diesel like 5,500rpm.
In 2006, BMW in N52 had 232lb-ft from 3ltr displacement engine at 2,750rpm, and still blew fire at 7,000rpm.
When you talk about S70/2, we are talking about V12 engine, which is much, much harder to make to spin that fast, compare to 4cyl.
As for MB, I just mentioned as OP has MB. As I stated, choice of oil is made based on numerous factors each company does. Any NA European engine can make hundreds of thousands miles driven by average American driver on American roads using ILSAC GF-5 oils. They cannot do that in Germany. Anyone who knows anything about German culture knows that when they developed those engines and recommended oils, they could not care less about someone in Austin.
 
Last edited:
Originally Posted by edyvw
Originally Posted by OVERKILL
Originally Posted by fdcg27

You wanna talk specific output?
Show me a production NA Euro car engine that can meet the standard set by the Honda S2000.
Honda recommended no more than an API 10w30 for this engine.
Sorry, but Euro engineering really isn't all that grand by current standards, much as I've liked owning Euro cars in the past.


While the S2000 was indeed impressive, particularly the slightly more power dense but arguably less fun AP1 version at 123HP/L in its most powerful incarnation with an 11.7:1 compression ratio (versus the AP2 at 108HP/L), several years earlier BMW had produced the S70/2 for McLaren for use in the F1, which, in street trim produced 618HP (103HP/L) with an 11:1 compression ratio, or if you were one of the lucky buggers to end up with a few of the very limited production LM models, you received 680HP (113HP/L), very close to Honda's later AP1 figure, higher than that of the AP2 and at an only slightly less incredible redline of 8,500rpm. It of course also got to wear the title of fastest car in the world for a stint
wink.gif



Now, you DID say production, and while the BMW S62 (featured in the E39 M5) was indeed a production engine, its use in the Ascari A10 likely doesn't fit with your criteria, since the car was never mass produced. However it does beg mention I think for the simple fact that this 90's engine was able to go from producing a modest 400HP in sedan trim (80HP/L) to 625HP in Ascari trim (125HP/L).

I'm not sure why edyvw chose the MB engine he did
21.gif
Speaking specifically of sedans, the current AMG S65 is powered by a 621HP V12, and its slightly less powerful S63 sibling's 4.0L bi-turbo V8 produces 603HP. I don't believe Lexus makes anything in that ballpark.

When one talks about specific output, we forget that in naturally aspirated engines more hp usually indicates torque at very high rpms.
For example engine in my Toyota has 245lb-ft at 4,500rpms. Engine is completely lathergic below 4000rpms. One would expect that engine would blew fire at 6,500rpm, but it literally runs out of air at diesel like 5,500rpm.
In 2006, BMW in N52 had 232lb-ft from 3ltr displacement engine at 2,750rpm, and still blew fire at 7,000rpm.
When you talk about S70/2, we are talking about V12 engine, which is much, much harder to make to spin that fast, compare to 4cyl.
As for MB, I just mentioned as OP has MB. As I stated, choice of oil is made based on numerous factors each company does. Any NA European engine can make hundreds of thousands miles driven by average American driver on American roads using ILSAC GF-5 oils. They cannot do that in Germany. Anyone who knows anything about German culture knows that when they developed those engines and recommended oils, they could not care less about someone in Austin.


There are vast stretches in the US and Canada where you can drive quite fast for hours on end. That such things ever existed in continental Europe is more myth then reality. The German driven engines may not last as long simply because they spend so much time crawling through German traffic.
Sorry edy, but that's reality.
Been there, done that and the opportunities to go really fast are very limited, more so than they are here.
You wanna do 90 mph through the Western Plains or West Texas? Have at it since nobody will care. Been there and done that in both. Not much road you can get by with that in Germany nor anywhere else in the EU.
 
Originally Posted by fdcg27
Originally Posted by edyvw
Originally Posted by OVERKILL
Originally Posted by fdcg27

You wanna talk specific output?
Show me a production NA Euro car engine that can meet the standard set by the Honda S2000.
Honda recommended no more than an API 10w30 for this engine.
Sorry, but Euro engineering really isn't all that grand by current standards, much as I've liked owning Euro cars in the past.


While the S2000 was indeed impressive, particularly the slightly more power dense but arguably less fun AP1 version at 123HP/L in its most powerful incarnation with an 11.7:1 compression ratio (versus the AP2 at 108HP/L), several years earlier BMW had produced the S70/2 for McLaren for use in the F1, which, in street trim produced 618HP (103HP/L) with an 11:1 compression ratio, or if you were one of the lucky buggers to end up with a few of the very limited production LM models, you received 680HP (113HP/L), very close to Honda's later AP1 figure, higher than that of the AP2 and at an only slightly less incredible redline of 8,500rpm. It of course also got to wear the title of fastest car in the world for a stint
wink.gif



Now, you DID say production, and while the BMW S62 (featured in the E39 M5) was indeed a production engine, its use in the Ascari A10 likely doesn't fit with your criteria, since the car was never mass produced. However it does beg mention I think for the simple fact that this 90's engine was able to go from producing a modest 400HP in sedan trim (80HP/L) to 625HP in Ascari trim (125HP/L).

I'm not sure why edyvw chose the MB engine he did
21.gif
Speaking specifically of sedans, the current AMG S65 is powered by a 621HP V12, and its slightly less powerful S63 sibling's 4.0L bi-turbo V8 produces 603HP. I don't believe Lexus makes anything in that ballpark.

When one talks about specific output, we forget that in naturally aspirated engines more hp usually indicates torque at very high rpms.
For example engine in my Toyota has 245lb-ft at 4,500rpms. Engine is completely lathergic below 4000rpms. One would expect that engine would blew fire at 6,500rpm, but it literally runs out of air at diesel like 5,500rpm.
In 2006, BMW in N52 had 232lb-ft from 3ltr displacement engine at 2,750rpm, and still blew fire at 7,000rpm.
When you talk about S70/2, we are talking about V12 engine, which is much, much harder to make to spin that fast, compare to 4cyl.
As for MB, I just mentioned as OP has MB. As I stated, choice of oil is made based on numerous factors each company does. Any NA European engine can make hundreds of thousands miles driven by average American driver on American roads using ILSAC GF-5 oils. They cannot do that in Germany. Anyone who knows anything about German culture knows that when they developed those engines and recommended oils, they could not care less about someone in Austin.


There are vast stretches in the US and Canada where you can drive quite fast for hours on end. That such things ever existed in continental Europe is more myth then reality. The German driven engines may not last as long simply because they spend so much time crawling through German traffic.
Sorry edy, but that's reality.
Been there, done that and the opportunities to go really fast are very limited, more so than they are here.
You wanna do 90 mph through the Western Plains or West Texas? Have at it since nobody will care. Been there and done that in both. Not much road you can get by with that in Germany nor anywhere else in the EU.


Alright, I'll take the bait, and the abuse.
Hey fdcg27, with all due respect because I've seen your posts for years now, one can drive much faster in the E.U. Driving 130 mph for two hours straight does place different demands on many elements of a vehicle.
Edyvw, you bring up valid points but with sweeping generalizations about places and people and things which weaken your argument.
Did I miss the post with the RX8 hp/liter?
 
Originally Posted by fdcg27
Originally Posted by edyvw
Originally Posted by OVERKILL
Originally Posted by fdcg27

You wanna talk specific output?
Show me a production NA Euro car engine that can meet the standard set by the Honda S2000.
Honda recommended no more than an API 10w30 for this engine.
Sorry, but Euro engineering really isn't all that grand by current standards, much as I've liked owning Euro cars in the past.


While the S2000 was indeed impressive, particularly the slightly more power dense but arguably less fun AP1 version at 123HP/L in its most powerful incarnation with an 11.7:1 compression ratio (versus the AP2 at 108HP/L), several years earlier BMW had produced the S70/2 for McLaren for use in the F1, which, in street trim produced 618HP (103HP/L) with an 11:1 compression ratio, or if you were one of the lucky buggers to end up with a few of the very limited production LM models, you received 680HP (113HP/L), very close to Honda's later AP1 figure, higher than that of the AP2 and at an only slightly less incredible redline of 8,500rpm. It of course also got to wear the title of fastest car in the world for a stint
wink.gif



Now, you DID say production, and while the BMW S62 (featured in the E39 M5) was indeed a production engine, its use in the Ascari A10 likely doesn't fit with your criteria, since the car was never mass produced. However it does beg mention I think for the simple fact that this 90's engine was able to go from producing a modest 400HP in sedan trim (80HP/L) to 625HP in Ascari trim (125HP/L).

I'm not sure why edyvw chose the MB engine he did
21.gif
Speaking specifically of sedans, the current AMG S65 is powered by a 621HP V12, and its slightly less powerful S63 sibling's 4.0L bi-turbo V8 produces 603HP. I don't believe Lexus makes anything in that ballpark.

When one talks about specific output, we forget that in naturally aspirated engines more hp usually indicates torque at very high rpms.
For example engine in my Toyota has 245lb-ft at 4,500rpms. Engine is completely lathergic below 4000rpms. One would expect that engine would blew fire at 6,500rpm, but it literally runs out of air at diesel like 5,500rpm.
In 2006, BMW in N52 had 232lb-ft from 3ltr displacement engine at 2,750rpm, and still blew fire at 7,000rpm.
When you talk about S70/2, we are talking about V12 engine, which is much, much harder to make to spin that fast, compare to 4cyl.
As for MB, I just mentioned as OP has MB. As I stated, choice of oil is made based on numerous factors each company does. Any NA European engine can make hundreds of thousands miles driven by average American driver on American roads using ILSAC GF-5 oils. They cannot do that in Germany. Anyone who knows anything about German culture knows that when they developed those engines and recommended oils, they could not care less about someone in Austin.


There are vast stretches in the US and Canada where you can drive quite fast for hours on end. That such things ever existed in continental Europe is more myth then reality. The German driven engines may not last as long simply because they spend so much time crawling through German traffic.
Sorry edy, but that's reality.
Been there, done that and the opportunities to go really fast are very limited, more so than they are here.
You wanna do 90 mph through the Western Plains or West Texas? Have at it since nobody will care. Been there and done that in both. Not much road you can get by with that in Germany nor anywhere else in the EU.

90mph is fast??? For Subaru, yeah, probably.
 
Last edited:
Quote
Alright, I'll take the bait, and the abuse.
Hey fdcg27, with all due respect because I've seen your posts for years now, one can drive much faster in the E.U. Driving 130 mph for two hours straight does place different demands on many elements of a vehicle.
Edyvw, you bring up valid points but with sweeping generalizations about places and people and things which weaken your argument.
Did I miss the post with the RX8 hp/liter?


I think RX8 is one of those specialty cars that had interesting idea, but how applicable that engine is? My brother had that car for fun, and no doubt it had huge output per liter. But abysmal torque at extremely high rpms is not something that is useful and tendency to overheat in no time really killed that idea (or partnership with Ford did).
 
Originally Posted by Falcon_LS
For your application, all you need is an oil meeting MB Sheet 229.5. Castrol Edge 0W-40, Mobil 1 0W-40, Pennzoil Platinum Euro 0W-40 are all decent oils that are widely available. 7 liters of oil, a quality fleece filter like Hengst, and you're good to go.
smile.gif


^^^ This ^^^

MaximaGuy - you are overthinking it. I use Mann or Pur oil filters purchased from Rock Auto at great price (less than 1/2 of the cost of a Mercedes branded filter and Pur makes them for MB in many applications) and run Pennzoil Euro 0W-40 in my C300 and Castrol Edge 0W-40 in my AMG, Neither of my MB's much cared for M1 Euro 0W-40 and with the "rollbacks" on Castrol and clearance on Pennzoil at Walmart, I am stocked for a while on both cars.
 
Where can you actually drive 130 mph for two hours never slowing?
I'd doubt that there's anywhere in the world this can be done, since there's too much traffic and too many trucks clogging things up.
Europe is a crowded place with about 1.6X US population on roughly 60% of the land area of the continental US.
I realize that EU metro areas have far greater population density than is typical is the US, but even that can't leave much room for the wide open spaces that allow for sustained fast driving.
The newer Forester will easily exceed the ton and needs only 2500 revs to do so.
Ask me how I know this, LOL!
If the car were routinely operated that fast, I'd still be giving it a 0W-XX oil, but it would be an A3/B4 flavor and not the 0W-20 API SN oil it currently gets for its tough traffic commute use.
After all, sustained higher power outputs do heat the oil and a higher HTHS blend would be desirable under those conditions.
 
Originally Posted by fdcg27
Where can you actually drive 130 mph for two hours never slowing?
I'd doubt that there's anywhere in the world this can be done, since there's too much traffic and too many trucks clogging things up.
Europe is a crowded place with about 1.6X US population on roughly 60% of the land area of the continental US.
I realize that EU metro areas have far greater population density than is typical is the US, but even that can't leave much room for the wide open spaces that allow for sustained fast driving.
The newer Forester will easily exceed the ton and needs only 2500 revs to do so.
Ask me how I know this, LOL!
If the car were routinely operated that fast, I'd still be giving it a 0W-XX oil, but it would be an A3/B4 flavor and not the 0W-20 API SN oil it currently gets for its tough traffic commute use.
After all, sustained higher power outputs do heat the oil and a higher HTHS blend would be desirable under those conditions.


Well there are stretches on the Autobahn where you can do that speed. Not sure if you could the full 2 hours at that speed but I remember doing about 120 for certain stretches, standard cruise speed was about 90. At a bit over 120, you really pay attention to the road. You do get forced to slow down as you approach cities/towns though but can speed up once you're past them.
 
^^^ this.... Especially in Germany @ night time...plenty of those stretches become "off the limits" till the morning when rush hour is back again.....

...and its not unusual to see plenty of "autobahn bombers" (RS6...AMG...Mx) @practicing low level night flying
smile.gif
 
Last edited:
Originally Posted by fdcg27
Where can you actually drive 130 mph for two hours never slowing?
I'd doubt that there's anywhere in the world this can be done, since there's too much traffic and too many trucks clogging things up.


Take the A20. Unlimited for most of the duration. You can go from Prenzlau to Lübeck flat out nearly the entire way. There are two bridges near Pasewalk and then there are the junctions near Rostock and Wismar, but that's all there is concerning speed limits, So we are talking about ~10km out of 300km that have a speed limit. Unless you take a weekend on the start or end of summer vacations, this Autobahn will be as close to empty as you will ever see a road. The state of Mecklenburg-Vorpommern has a few old towns near the sea, but else consist solely of forests and lakes a bit of farmland in beetween. Population density is extremely low, so is traffic.

Quote
Europe is a crowded place with about 1.6X US population on roughly 60% of the land area of the continental US.
I realize that EU metro areas have far greater population density than is typical is the US, but even that can't leave much room for the wide open spaces that allow for sustained fast driving.


US metropolitan areas are ridiculously inefficient when it comes to housing people.
wink.gif

Population densities vary greatly across Europe. And you are right, usually you can't go fast in the big metropolitan areas. Either because of speed limits (both for traffic safety and noise control - some motorways cut right through residential areas), or because of traffic density itself.
But there is lot of room between these big areas.
Currently, 70% of the german Autobahn network does not have a permanent speed limit. There may be temporary limits - construction works for example, and especially on sections with very high traffic, you will usually find somethingcalled "automatische Verkehrsbeeinflussung" - electronic sign bridges governing speed limits according to traffic conditions. So the exact sampe patch of road can have a speed limit of 60km/h - or it can be unlimited, depending on the time of day and the traffic situation.
And it should be self explaining, that you can't go flat out on an unlimited Autobahn even if there is only moderately heavy traffic.
So how fast you can drive really depends on the time of day.
Take my weekly commute from Munich to Berlin, for example. 580km door to door. If you drive with the masses, that is Friday evening from Munich to Berlin, or sunday evening back from Berlin to Munich, expect that trip to take 6 or 7 hours. Go the other direction, or go in the middle of the night, and you can easily make it in less than 4 hours. There are a lot of limited sections so the A9, which means you will be way above 200km/h anywhere where it is possible. While you will not run 2 hours straight at full throttle, it may well be for uninterrupted 45minutes to an hour. Which is something, that I, relying on hearsay about american speeding fines, would definitely not be doing in the US of A.
 
Last edited:
Originally Posted by fdcg27
Where can you actually drive 130 mph for two hours never slowing?
I'd doubt that there's anywhere in the world this can be done, since there's too much traffic and too many trucks clogging things up.
Europe is a crowded place with about 1.6X US population on roughly 60% of the land area of the continental US.
I realize that EU metro areas have far greater population density than is typical is the US, but even that can't leave much room for the wide open spaces that allow for sustained fast driving.
The newer Forester will easily exceed the ton and needs only 2500 revs to do so.
Ask me how I know this, LOL!
If the car were routinely operated that fast, I'd still be giving it a 0W-XX oil, but it would be an A3/B4 flavor and not the 0W-20 API SN oil it currently gets for its tough traffic commute use.
After all, sustained higher power outputs do heat the oil and a higher HTHS blend would be desirable under those conditions.

You will not be able to drive 130mph constantly (and 130mph for some cars is warming up).
When I was working for car magazine we would always drive during night. Than you can squeeze last mph out of anything you driving, be it 1.0 three cyl, or M5.
And yes, Subaru recommends ACEA A3/B3 B4 or C3 oils in Europe.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom