OK...I never argued there was infrastructure there beyond ones house. You've claimed I have twice.
I believe they don't work for you.
The range of the car itself may be fine for your next door neighbor
OK...I never argued there was infrastructure there beyond ones house. You've claimed I have twice.
I believe they don't work for you.
The range of the car itself may be fine for your next door neighbor
yeesh never had anything like that in any car I can remember or drove.The worst hit I ever took in the cold was in my Mazda CX5 Turbo. It took Mazda over 2 years to drop an update that eliminated cold weather power loss, and it was substantial. I went from taking 6.5 or so seconds 0-60 to well over 10 seconds in weather under 20*F.
No, it's not cool. Are you cool with all the wars this country has fought over oil? Find me your sinless solution...So it’s cool then?
Yeah, it sucked. I complained about it for years to the service manager and GM, and finally (not as a result of me), Mazda released a software update that fixed it. The ECU pulled 100% of the boost in 1st gear, and nearly 100% in 2nd gear. 3rd and 4th accelerated similar to normal.yeesh never had anything like that in any car I can remember or drove.
Yeah, it sucked. I complained about it for years to the service manager and GM, and finally (not as a result of me), Mazda released a software update that fixed it. The ECU pulled 100% of the boost in 1st gear, and nearly 100% in 2nd gear. 3rd and 4th accelerated similar to normal.
Yes. It had that cold weather boost cut (fixed in 2022 I heard), and it munched mirror motors to the tune of once every 20-25k miles (both sides). Other than that, pretty flawless, and the motors got a TSB, too, allegedly. For its price point nothing touches it IMO.I recall you liking that car for the most part - am I remembering correctly?
My kids got Mazda 3 sedan, pretty impressed for the bones it cost.Yes. It had that cold weather boost cut (fixed in 2022 I heard), and it munched mirror motors to the tune of once every 20-25k miles (both sides). Other than that, pretty flawless, and the motors got a TSB, too, allegedly. For its price point nothing touches it IMO.
You think so? The 4 cylinder Fox body of 80’s and that v6 of 1990s was simply awful too. At least it moves quickly.I still think it should have been called the Galax-E. They alienated a lot of the hardcore Mustang enthusiast market by calling it a Mustang.
What wars were those? Wars to keep the petro dollar the currency of trade yes.No, it's not cool. Are you cool with all the wars this country has fought over oil? Find me your sinless solution...
What do you think we've been doing for the last 20 years?What wars were those? Wars to keep the petro dollar the currency of trade yes.
Also, for non-track or heavy towing use, is limiting maximum acceleration to 5 seconds an issue?
Not sure if we are at this point, but you do make some great points. Legacy car makers are strapped with their legacy business models in the Internet age.Let me simplify this.
1) Ford's EV successes will likely be with trucks and full-sized SUVs.
2) Tesla is still the only automaker who makes a fun and futuristic EV.
3) If you invested in the eight largest automakers 12 years ago and held onto them until today, your net return would have been 0.01%. I calculated this about a week ago.
These automakers have made hundreds of billions of dollars during the greatest period of global prosperity in history. And adjusting for inflation, they're now worth over 20% less than in the height of the Great Recession.
Why? The competition.
Tesla has 30% margins. No dealers limiting their competitiveness. No retiree costs. And no need to advertise. They are synonymous with EVs. Everywhere. And their current generation of batteries will usually last between 300k to 450k miles with only a 20% to 25% reduction in range.
The game is already over. We're just watching the winner collect the chips.
Your entire wrath is 100% about me saying Ford targeted their first EV at the wrong demographic by calling it a Mustang. I said nothing negative against EV's in general or Tesla. If you have an alternate theory on Mach E sales what say you? You would rather troll and argue about EV's.The average sales price when? Last year - or now?
I didnt bring up "32K". Wrong guy.
I gave a range on half tons - are half tons for the rich?
Do you live in a house or apartment?
I'm not anyones fanboy. I dont own a tesla (or any EV) I have two trucks and more powerful gasoline toys than almost anyone in this forum.
In a word, sickening to see taxpayer $$ wasted like this. Time to hide.................Today the Feds updated their guidance on the EV credit. This an go a long way towards price drops.
Per the WSJ
"For instance, to qualify now, EVs must be assembled in North America, and the manufacturer’s suggested retail price cannot exceed a certain amount. For SUVs, trucks and pickups, the cap is $80,000; for all other vehicles, it is $55,000.
To determine what vehicles are eligible, the Treasury Department initially said it would rely on corporate average fuel economy standards set by the Environmental Protection Agency, which defined some versions of crossovers like Tesla’s Model Y and Ford’s Mach-E as sedans.
Auto makers and lobby groups pushed back, saying that definition was inconsistent with how other federal agencies classified SUVs and cars.
Now, classifications will be based on the vehicle label and what is published about models on FuelEconomy.com, the Treasury Department said. "
Guns-n-Butter! Everyone wants a piece for what they deem is important.In a word, sickening to see taxpayer $$ wasted like this. Time to hide.................![]()
Yep, but imo there are things a lot more important than this. Opinions will vary.Guns-n-Butter! Everyone wants a piece for what they deem is important.