For $9 liter, no thanks. From just the name, this sounds like it has a high moly content. Not that that is bad, but one of GC's interesting points is the lack of moly yet protections very well.
quote: Originally posted by blupupher: For $9 liter, no thanks. From just the name, this sounds like it has a high moly content. Not that that is bad, but one of GC's interesting points is the lack of moly yet protections very well.
I had posted the VOA (and a couple of UOA's from my VW 1.8T) of LM 5W-40 a while ago. I'm running GC right now because my LM source got a little too expensive. Personally, I'd run the M1 5W-40 before I went back to LM. You can't beat the price of the M1 5W-40, especially for the OCI of 5,000 miles I'm currently running.
quote: Originally posted by blupupher: For $9 liter, no thanks. From just the name, this sounds like it has a high moly content. Not that that is bad, but one of GC's interesting points is the lack of moly yet protections very well.