I have an FAA type leakdown tester... (it has the FAA spec 0.040" dia orifice, 0.250" long, with 60 degree approach, departure). I have an unabused conventional compression tester. When, a number of years ago, I tested my Plymouth Reliant 2.5 - I got a lousy indication of leakdown, yet I got a great indication of a compression test.
My point of mentioning this is that one is a dynamic test, and it involves testing whether the cam lobes are worn, as well as testing in essence the whole length of stroke (by way of cylinder wall)... and the other one is a static test... that allows a person to isolate what is bad, albeit just at TDC. They both are useful in diagnosis.
The other comment, re the conventional compression test, is that how quickly and energetically that needle jumps up... with the first compression hit... also tells you something. A lazy approach to a final compression value signals a weak cylinder, too.