My attachment does provide some necessary clarity, let me try to make this simpler:
- You are concerned about catalyst protection, which, for the RC (Resource Conserving) grades (xW-30 and below) is achieved by restricting the maximum amount of phosphorous to 800ppm.
- Phosphorous, if it makes its way onto the catalyst substrate in sufficient quantity, poisons the catalyst.
- How phosphorous gets onto the catalyst substrate is through oil consumption. Ergo, if your application doesn't meaningfully consume oil, then little phosphorous is making its way into the catalyst.
- The limit on phosphorous is only applied to lighter grades of oil (the Resource Conserving grades, where the focus is on reducing fuel consumption), which are more likely to be consumed, and thus expose the catalyst to phosphorous.
- You are looking at grades (xW-40 and xW-50) that are NOT subject to the limits imposed on the RC grades. There is no limit on phosphorous for the grades you are looking at. This means that the API level of the lubricants you are looking at will have NO BEARING on their catalyst protection level, because they are EXEMPT. This is why the answer from AI is completely off the mark, an API SP or SQ 20W-50 could have DOUBLE the amount of phosphorous present in a 5W-30, and still be compliant, because it's not subject to the same restrictions.
This is why I shared the table from Mobil, which clearly shows that despite having 1,100ppm of phosphorous, Mobil 1 5W-50 is able to be API SP, because the RC designation doesn't apply to the grade. Ergo, your focus on the API level as being indicative to the amount of catalyst protection the product provides is misguided, because that would only be helping you out if you were looking at RC grades, xW-30 and below.
Does that help?