I found this interesting.
They do address it.No comparison to thread locker. Interesting.
If I had a piece of equipment with fasteners that were subjected to that kind of vibration I don't think I'd be using anti-seize on the threads.
Me too. Every Mercedes Ive had used double nuts on the rear shocks, and they have been hard to remove. I’d think that shocks would be a good chance for vibration and chances to have a bit of up-down motion that could cause them to come apart…I’m shocked at how susceptible double nuts were to vibration. I would’ve guessed differently.
But this Nordlock looks like an excellent product for high vibration applications.
I think the video is demonstrating crazy levels of vibration - way more than any road vehicle would see. I've probably only seen 2 or 3 instances where a bolt or nut loosened up from vibration. One had a spring lock washer. A little blue Loctite and a proper torque cured it.This kind of information confounds me, as it should anyone with OCD. I still see lots of new equipment put together with the traditional split ring lock washers. Why, if they are not effective? Why are we not being educated more openly about these better lock washers? Is this a non-problem except in very critical situations?
There are occasionally fasteners that tend to come loose on some engines usually where mix metal parts meet eg thin steel header flanges. Machinery and motor cycles especially old Brit and HD really can benefit from these.That was a good video. I wish they would have shown the tooth type lock washer and the nuts that have some “teeth” on their flange.
But all that said, what went through my mind first was, is the Junker test relevant? How many cars go hundreds of thousands of miles with certain fasteners untouched and tight? What about other stuff in other applications, may be permanent with no issue?
Maybe in a safety critical/mission essential application, this matters, but in other applications, like most everything most of us encounter, does it?
The shocks have rubber mounting to absorb vibration, if the didnt it would be a very unpleasant ride.Me too. Every Mercedes Ive had used double nuts on the rear shocks, and they have been hard to remove. I’d think that shocks would be a good chance for vibration and chances to have a bit of up-down motion that could cause them to come apart…
No doubt there are places these can be used with benefit. Fortunately I haven’t had to deal much with backing out on vehicles. OPE and other applications I have.There are occasionally fasteners that tend to come loose on some engines usually where mix metal parts meet eg thin steel header flanges. Machinery and motor cycles especially old Brit and HD really can benefit from these.
The shocks have rubber mounting to absorb vibration, if the didnt it would be a very unpleasant ride.
+1 Absolutely, way more than would be experienced in normal service for most vehicles but I like the point they are making which as far as can tell is some of the methods we have been using for decades to prevent loosening are just not as good as we thought they were when subjected to situations that would cause them to loosen anyway.I think the video is demonstrating crazy levels of vibration - way more than any road vehicle would see. I've probably only seen 2 or 3 instances where a bolt or nut loosened up from vibration. One had a spring lock washer. A little blue Loctite and a proper torque cured it.
Anything that is critical to safety should be locked with some type of bend-over metal tab (like used on motorcycle rear sprocket nuts) or similar, or lock wired. Lots of fasteners are lock wired on critical aircraft hardware.
These special lock washers would be a good alternative if a mechanical locking system (lock tabs, safery wire, etc) isn't well suited.