Agreed 100%.
Also, the deposits tend to capture wear items that get mobilized and suspended with an oil/additive that cleans them. So I would think maybe the first a few oil changes should not be for UOA to assess the wear protection.
HDEO's aren't formulated as "cleaners" any more than PCMO's are (with the exception of Valvoline Premium Blue Restore, which was an HDEO specifically formulated to clean with a heavy dose of esters). Detergents/Dispersants don't operate like most think they do, they don't break-down and remove existing hard deposits, their role is almost exclusively preventative: Prevent the agglomeration of particulate (dispersants) and prevent them from plating out; keep them in suspension and help them get to the filter (detergents) so they can be removed from circulation.
When this capability is overwhelmed, through intervals that are too long or an application that is more demanding than the lube chemistry is able to handle, you get varnish/lacquer.
Sludge is about the only thing your bog standard modern Group II+/Group III HDEO or PCMO is going to be able to remove, because it's an agglomeration of moisture and particulate with no real bonding mechanism, so it isn't adhered to a surface like varnish/lacquer.
This is why Valvoline's VRP product is such a big deal now, because it actually cleans, and is at an attainable price point for the "price sensitive" consumer.
"Back in the day" it's possible that extremely cheap HDEO's, formulated with Group I, which is a polar base with decent solvency (which is offset by its propensity to break-down and create deposits, rapidly oxidize and other undesirable characteristics) would have done some cleaning, due to their base oil blend, but anything modern with modern approvals is going to be formulated with something like Mobil's Group II+ EHC bases, which are hydrocracked just like Group III is, and thus very dry with poor solvency and no polarity.