Jeep Rubicon and Audi Q7

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Jun 26, 2003
Messages
13,092
Location
Illinois
I visited by BIL in Dallas and had the chance to drive each of these for short trips.

The Jeep, a relatively new, as in about 7K miles on the clock, soft top, 5 speed.

Good gravy, how can one drive on of these as a daily driver, but my BIL does. Darn uncomfortable, rough ride, and I'm thinking there is really no need for 4wd near SMU in Dallas. So it probably will not see any offroad action.

But if he likes it, that's fine with me. Typical Chrysler/Jeep interior. Seemed low rent. Not really impressed.

Of course, that may be in part to having driven the Q7 the next day. It was a Clean Diesel, and I didn't really even notice it was a diesel until the day after he brought us home from the airport.

Very quiet. The only real indication from the inside was the Diesel Fuel Only logo and the tach with the sub 5K RPM redline.

Both the Jeep and the Audi had factory navigation systems. The one in the Audi was worlds apart from the Jeep.

Both would get you home, but the Audi was able to locate nearby amenities such as fuel stations, and give you the brand of the station, not just that it was fuel.

Getting in the back seat of the Jeep was nearly impossible for this mid-40's man. My suitcase ended up there on the first night and it was nearly impossible to get it out. My wife's bag, not such a large bag took up nearly all of the cargo space in back.

The Q7 was easier to reach the 3rd row seating. On the trip back to the airport yesterday, we are able to get 6 in the vehicle with weekend luggage for five, including my wife's birthday gifts she brought back from the big D.

While I'm not an SUV or crossover fan, the Audi really didn't drive like an SUV. It was more like a big car.

The Jeep, in comparison was like a toy.

This really isn't a vs comparison. On the other hand, much of the genesis of the Audi comes from the Jeep 4WD world. Audi has simply taken the idea of the all wheel drive vehicle and refined it beyond belief.

I don't think I'd drop the cash for the Audi. I simply can't afford to spend that much for a vehicle and still live indoors and save for my retirement.

With that said, it was a very impressive vehicle.

The kids really liked the panoramic sunroof.

Again, if you didn't tell someone this was a diesel, they probably would not know. It does not sound or smell like what folks think of when they think diesel.
 
Give me the Jeep- it'll still be running in 200k miles. I have my doubts about the Audi.

When you say "relatively new" for the Jeep- is it a TJ (1995-2006) or a JK (06-present)? There's a fairly big difference, at least for Jeep. Everything with the Wrangler is evolutionary rather than revolutionary, which is as it should be with a serious offroad platform as respected as it is. I'm very curious to get behind the wheel of a JK, something I haven't done yet.
 
I doubt either of them will have their vehicles at 200K.

The Jeep is an 06-present, probably a 2009 or 2010 as it only had 7K miles on the clock.

The Audi was a '10 with 3337 when I filled it with 25 gallons of diesel fuel.

The Jeep just isn't my cup of tea. Not very useful, and given how much I would drive, it would beat me up in my day to day life.

The Audi, probably wouldn't last, too many gizmos. But it's a company car, she's an executive and has her car provided, so it's probably leased for two or three years and then returned.

The car will probably run for 200K miles, but all the neat stuff around it will bankrupt you if you keep it going.

But at least she chose the right engine, the clean diesel is the best engine for that ride.
 
Those are two very different vehicles... My BIL had a YJ and I'd say its more like a tool than a toy. It's a tool to go places offroad that most vehicles don't even dream about.
I'm sure if you looked underneath the Audi and Jeep you would laugh/cringe at the thought of taking the Audi offroad.
 
Gimme the jeep. Anyone who buys one knows that the ride won't be that smooth, it won't be that refined, fast, and the interior won't be great. (Heck, if you think the JK interior is bad, you should have seen the TJ. In fact, the JK is better in all respects except engine choices)
 
Originally Posted By: javacontour
I doubt either of them will have their vehicles at 200K.

The Jeep is an 06-present, probably a 2009 or 2010 as it only had 7K miles on the clock.


The Jeep just isn't my cup of tea. Not very useful, and given how much I would drive, it would beat me up in my day to day life.


I understand that- a friend of mine described a Wrangler as "like driving a basketball" over Louisiana concrete highway expansion joints. My Cherokee is slightly less bouncy than a Wrangler (and if you think that JK would beat you up, don't go anywhere near a YJ, or heaven forbid a CJ!) But I like Jeeps- just wonderfully simple, rugged, reliable vehicles in an automotive market gone ape-poo with whiz-bang gadgets that I need about like I need an extra 30 pounds of fat on me. :-p

What would really suit me is a clean, well-mannered common-rail diesel engine in a Wrangler.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom