Is the Napa Gold...

Status
Not open for further replies.
Originally Posted By: Patman

I previously thought the TG used a pure cellulose media and finding out that it's also a blended media like the NAPA Gold does change my opinion of them slightly, but I still have a hard time with those fiber end caps, I just don't think they'll provide the same level of durability of metal ones to go 10k.


Now that's funny. TG has never used a plain cellulose media, it is nearly 40% synthetic fibers. And that end cap? Honda uses it as OE and they have 10k or one year change intervals, but hey what do Honda engine designers know anyway right?
 
Originally Posted By: Triple_Se7en
Originally Posted By: ZeeOSix
Originally Posted By: Triple_Se7en
Repeat
The three filter brands/models I mentioned are designed / aligned with racing / high performance.

I really don't care what you think about advertisements of such.


Putting a filter on a hi-pro car doesn't make it a "racing filter". Some guys also use a basic Fram EG on hi-pro cars and "race cars", but doesn't mean it's actually "designed/aligned" for racing and high performance. Only the manufacturer can make that claim.


Yes, some do use filters other than the ones mentioned.
Who ever said they couldn't?
The filters I mentioned are designed for high performance and racing in-mind. They offer improved oil flow over their sister products.

If you believe the Fram Ultra flows like the three I mentioned, well my vehicles say otherwise and I've commented on that in recent various threads here. My GM no longer exhibits decreased idle, stutters, lowered oil pressure readings and cold startup rattle, the very minute I uninstalled the Ultra.

If you feel you can have both top-dog filtering and top-dog oil flow, then please show it to the racing industry. But don't hand them a Ultra, not if you want to invited back to their private, hood open car shows, commonly seen here that house 50-75 vehicles for a few hours in main business parking lots.

Math numbers, charts, stats and computations are nice on paper to show here. But math answers don;t work on your and my rides. Many times a dirty, greasy hand and a little common sense will outperform that computer print-out you have.

I'm done with this discussion..... take care.


You need to check out the SIN race cars at Racers Edge Motorsports. Running endurance races in the Pirelli World Sportcar Challenge, all the cars run off the shelf FRAM XG2's and both cars are 2/3's of the way through the season with zero engine issues. In fact in the Texas race, they won the pole and led green flag to checkers.
 
Originally Posted By: goodtimes
Originally Posted By: Triple_Se7en
Originally Posted By: ZeeOSix
Originally Posted By: Triple_Se7en
Repeat
The three filter brands/models I mentioned are designed / aligned with racing / high performance.

I really don't care what you think about advertisements of such.


Putting a filter on a hi-pro car doesn't make it a "racing filter". Some guys also use a basic Fram EG on hi-pro cars and "race cars", but doesn't mean it's actually "designed/aligned" for racing and high performance. Only the manufacturer can make that claim.


Yes, some do use filters other than the ones mentioned.
Who ever said they couldn't?
The filters I mentioned are designed for high performance and racing in-mind. They offer improved oil flow over their sister products.

If you believe the Fram Ultra flows like the three I mentioned, well my vehicles say otherwise and I've commented on that in recent various threads here. My GM no longer exhibits decreased idle, stutters, lowered oil pressure readings and cold startup rattle, the very minute I uninstalled the Ultra.

If you feel you can have both top-dog filtering and top-dog oil flow, then please show it to the racing industry. But don't hand them a Ultra, not if you want to invited back to their private, hood open car shows, commonly seen here that house 50-75 vehicles for a few hours in main business parking lots.

Math numbers, charts, stats and computations are nice on paper to show here. But math answers don;t work on your and my rides. Many times a dirty, greasy hand and a little common sense will outperform that computer print-out you have.

I'm done with this discussion..... take care.


Two questions. One, why don't the Fram Racing filters use Ultra media if it's so top dog? Secondly, where is that 22 psi Fram Ultra cross for the PF64?


First question- We sell racing filters for 10$ retail that have 500 psi burst strength and can run constant 200psi pressure. They have 5/16 thick tapping plates, silicone adbv's, screen over the hi flow bypass and are 94%@20 microns, flow between 12-22pm depending on model and are suitable for HP street car use up to 6k miles. So, why would we need to add 3+$ in cost so they could go 20k miles with a 5% improvement in efficiency? Most real race cars change oil before every race, it would be a waste of money to use Ultra media in a racing filter that already has 40% synthetic glass media. We field a road racing team at Racers Edge Motorsports that run endurance races in the Pirelli World Sportscar Challenge. These cars run off the shelf Ultra filters (XG2) and 2/3 of the way through the season all engines running just fine! Why no 22psi filter for GM? We have one for the 4 cylinders that came out with this requirement. p/n 12060 GM consolidated this to include older models including V8's. The current part number fits a ton of other Ford and Mopar applications, all of which had to be verified for use with a 22psi bypass, that work is complete however we will not be launching these until Jan 1st due to catalog costs. It costs us 500,000 to print and mail catalogs to customers and doing that twice a year is not in he plans. All these older GM models seemed to get along fine with the older relief valve and now GM in a consolidation move decided to make them all 22psi. Things are way ore complicated that ya'll think they are.
 
Where can I buy Fram Racing for $10? Things are not more complicated than we'all think they are. People here are well versed in many areas including business management. Finally the answer is given, the Ultra media is not used in the racing filters because the selling price would be $3 more. Plus racers don't need higher efficiency numbers or more capacity. It's nice to get an answer to a question.

Next question. Why make the racing filters at all if the Ultra is already so darn good for racing and is cheaper?

Waiting for link to $10 filters as I actually like them over the other Frams. Would be something productive from the thread.
 
Originally Posted By: Motorking

Now that's funny. TG has never used a plain cellulose media, it is nearly 40% synthetic fibers. And that end cap? Honda uses it as OE and they have 10k or one year change intervals, but hey what do Honda engine designers know anyway right?


My bad, I have never used a Toughguard filter so I didn't know much about it and incorrectly assumed that it's media was similar in construction to the Extraguard.

I know that fiber end caps are more durable than people give them credit for, but many people just feel a little uneasy and if given the choice they'd rather have metal. That's one of the reasons I choose to use the Ultra filter on all of my cars.
 
I'd really like to know why my thread asking about the Napa Gold turned into a debate on racing filters?
confused.gif
 
Originally Posted By: jongies3
I'd really like to know why my thread asking about the Napa Gold turned into a debate on racing filters?
confused.gif

Hijacked! On the NAPA Gold, they're a great mid to upper level filter, quite capable of 10K on a clean engine, and a great deal WHEN they can be found on sale. They're approaching $10 each at the NAPA stores here in Cincinnati, which is a no-go for me when eBay Ultras are $4-5 each, and even the XP/Platinum seems to be on sale & cheaper than the Gold much of the time!
21.gif
 
The NAPA Gold can become a "racing filter" if put on a race car.
grin2.gif
 
Originally Posted By: ZeeOSix
The NAPA Gold can become a "racing filter" if put on a race car.
grin2.gif



Yes, hopefully it’s just as fast as the car …
wink.gif
 
You can get HP3 and HP4 on Amazon for sub $10.00. Most of the others are a good bit more.

As for the Napa Gold, Napa Gold = (Regular) WIX right? Nothing wrong with those (at least so far) if you can get them at reasonable pricing.
 
I just bought the Wix 51515 (Napa Gold 1515) for $3.91 apiece from Rock Auto in the master pack of 12 filters.
 
Originally Posted By: wdn
I just bought the Wix 51515 (Napa Gold 1515) for $3.91 apiece from Rock Auto in the master pack of 12 filters.

Worth that. About the same price range as local Napa store semi annual 40% off Gold filter sale.
 
Originally Posted By: bullwinkle
Originally Posted By: jongies3
I'd really like to know why my thread asking about the Napa Gold turned into a debate on racing filters?
confused.gif

Hijacked! On the NAPA Gold, they're a great mid to upper level filter, quite capable of 10K on a clean engine, and a great deal WHEN they can be found on sale. They're approaching $10 each at the NAPA stores here in Cincinnati, which is a no-go for me when eBay Ultras are $4-5 each, and even the XP/Platinum seems to be on sale & cheaper than the Gold much of the time!
21.gif



Yeah they are kinda spendy. The one I bought for the Mustang was $7 and the WIX at O'Reilly's was $8! Can get an Ultra at Walmart for $8 and some change. Probably go with that next time around, just seems like a waste of such a good filter to only run it less than 1000 miles a year! I wish I could trust Motorcraft, the FL1A is $4 at Walmart, but I'll never let a Tearolator touch my most prized possession, not a chance! I just hope WIX/Napa filters don't start suffering the same tearing issues now that Mann & Hummel picked them up.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom